Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy. |
id |
AMB-1_6bc860c3373f5e86c988c8dcf1b77cd0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302021001001338 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussionPersonal autonomyFetusBioethicsJurisprudenceSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy.Associação Médica Brasileira2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.9 2021reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20210700info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabar,Fábio RobertoBinotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marsoneng2021-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302021001001338Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2021-11-17T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
title |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
spellingShingle |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion Cabar,Fábio Roberto Personal autonomy Fetus Bioethics Jurisprudence |
title_short |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
title_full |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
title_fullStr |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
title_sort |
Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion |
author |
Cabar,Fábio Roberto |
author_facet |
Cabar,Fábio Roberto Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabar,Fábio Roberto Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Personal autonomy Fetus Bioethics Jurisprudence |
topic |
Personal autonomy Fetus Bioethics Jurisprudence |
description |
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.20210700 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.9 2021 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212836826939392 |