Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain. |
id |
AMB-1_a34aa0aee34feaa2ec70988f54388056 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302021000901087 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back painChronic low back painQuestionnaireReproducibility of resultsSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain.Associação Médica Brasileira2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.8 2021reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20210087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro,Jocassia SilvaPontes-Silva,AndréAraujo,Gabriel Gardhel CostaMendes,Letícia PadilhaPires,Flávio de OliveiraFidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid AndréDibai-Filho,Almir Vieiraeng2021-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302021000901087Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2021-10-27T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
title |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
spellingShingle |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva Chronic low back pain Questionnaire Reproducibility of results |
title_short |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
title_full |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
title_fullStr |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
title_sort |
Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain |
author |
Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva |
author_facet |
Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva Pontes-Silva,André Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa Mendes,Letícia Padilha Pires,Flávio de Oliveira Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pontes-Silva,André Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa Mendes,Letícia Padilha Pires,Flávio de Oliveira Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva Pontes-Silva,André Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa Mendes,Letícia Padilha Pires,Flávio de Oliveira Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chronic low back pain Questionnaire Reproducibility of results |
topic |
Chronic low back pain Questionnaire Reproducibility of results |
description |
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.20210087 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.8 2021 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212836503977984 |