Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pontes-Silva,André, Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa, Mendes,Letícia Padilha, Pires,Flávio de Oliveira, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André, Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087
Resumo: SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain.
id AMB-1_a34aa0aee34feaa2ec70988f54388056
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302021000901087
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back painChronic low back painQuestionnaireReproducibility of resultsSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain.Associação Médica Brasileira2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.8 2021reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20210087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro,Jocassia SilvaPontes-Silva,AndréAraujo,Gabriel Gardhel CostaMendes,Letícia PadilhaPires,Flávio de OliveiraFidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid AndréDibai-Filho,Almir Vieiraeng2021-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302021000901087Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2021-10-27T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
title Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
spellingShingle Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva
Chronic low back pain
Questionnaire
Reproducibility of results
title_short Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
title_full Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
title_sort Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
author Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva
author_facet Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva
Pontes-Silva,André
Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa
Mendes,Letícia Padilha
Pires,Flávio de Oliveira
Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André
Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira
author_role author
author2 Pontes-Silva,André
Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa
Mendes,Letícia Padilha
Pires,Flávio de Oliveira
Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André
Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinheiro,Jocassia Silva
Pontes-Silva,André
Araujo,Gabriel Gardhel Costa
Mendes,Letícia Padilha
Pires,Flávio de Oliveira
Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes,Cid André
Dibai-Filho,Almir Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronic low back pain
Questionnaire
Reproducibility of results
topic Chronic low back pain
Questionnaire
Reproducibility of results
description SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). METHODS: Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000901087
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.20210087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.8 2021
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212836503977984