Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578 |
Resumo: | The dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research. |
id |
ANGRAD-1_a25803ac34477296ab8e7d22e4c3cf88 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/578 |
network_acronym_str |
ANGRAD-1 |
network_name_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternativeQualidade em Pesquisa Qualitativa Organizacional: tipos de triangulação como alternativa metodológicaTriangulationQualitative ResearchReliabilityCredibilityConfirmabilityTriangulaçãoPesquisa QualitativaConfiabilidadeCredibilidadeConfirmabilidadeThe dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research.O dicotômico debate entre objetividade e subjetividade em Ciências Sociais e as diferenças entre abordagens qualitativas e quantitativas em pesquisas relacionam-se à forte demanda por validação e acreditação de estudos. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste trabalho foi discutir a qualidade na pesquisa qualitativa por meio de uma análise sistemática das tipologias de estratégia de triangulação, então, destacando-se as seguintes dimensões de qualidade na pesquisa: confiabilidade, credibilidade, transferibilidade e confirmabilidade. Há diversas pesquisas sobre qualidade em pesquisas qualitativas e, também, sobre triangulação, no entanto o principal diferencial deste trabalho foi a apresentação sistemática de tipologias de triangulação que permitiram aumentar a qualidade das pesquisas. O foco em "como" melhorar a qualidade, e não a qualidade em si, torna este artigo original. Como achados, destacaram-se os esforços para sistematizar e apresentar as guias para melhorar a credibilidade em pesquisas qualitativas por meio da estratégia de triangulação, apresentada em uma estrutura que permita ao leitor uma melhor compreensão desta proposta. A principal implicação deste trabalho converge, especialmente, para pesquisadores adotantes de pesquisa qualitativa, principalmente, por fornecer orientações sobre como melhorar a qualidade de suas pesquisas.Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)2018-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/57810.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018): January-April; 66-98Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 19 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro-Abril; 66-982358-09172177-6083reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)instacron:ANGRADenghttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578/pdfAbdalla, Márcio MoutinhoOliveira, Leonel Gois LimaAzevedo, Carlos Eduardo FrancoGonzalez, Rafael Kuramotoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-29T14:43:09Zoai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/578Revistahttp://angrad.org.br/revistaPRIhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/oaiangrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br2358-09172177-6083opendoar:2020-10-29T14:43:09Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative Qualidade em Pesquisa Qualitativa Organizacional: tipos de triangulação como alternativa metodológica |
title |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
spellingShingle |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho Triangulation Qualitative Research Reliability Credibility Confirmability Triangulação Pesquisa Qualitativa Confiabilidade Credibilidade Confirmabilidade |
title_short |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
title_full |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
title_fullStr |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
title_sort |
Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative |
author |
Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho |
author_facet |
Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Triangulation Qualitative Research Reliability Credibility Confirmability Triangulação Pesquisa Qualitativa Confiabilidade Credibilidade Confirmabilidade |
topic |
Triangulation Qualitative Research Reliability Credibility Confirmability Triangulação Pesquisa Qualitativa Confiabilidade Credibilidade Confirmabilidade |
description |
The dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578 10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578 |
url |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018): January-April; 66-98 Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 19 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro-Abril; 66-98 2358-0917 2177-6083 reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online) instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) instacron:ANGRAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
instacron_str |
ANGRAD |
institution |
ANGRAD |
reponame_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
angrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212519273037824 |