Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima, Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco, Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Administração (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578
Resumo: The dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research.
id ANGRAD-1_a25803ac34477296ab8e7d22e4c3cf88
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/578
network_acronym_str ANGRAD-1
network_name_str Administração (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternativeQualidade em Pesquisa Qualitativa Organizacional: tipos de triangulação como alternativa metodológicaTriangulationQualitative ResearchReliabilityCredibilityConfirmabilityTriangulaçãoPesquisa QualitativaConfiabilidadeCredibilidadeConfirmabilidadeThe dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research.O dicotômico debate entre objetividade e subjetividade em Ciências Sociais e as diferenças entre abordagens qualitativas e quantitativas em pesquisas relacionam-se à forte demanda por validação e acreditação de estudos. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste trabalho foi discutir a qualidade na pesquisa qualitativa por meio de uma análise sistemática das tipologias de estratégia de triangulação, então, destacando-se as seguintes dimensões de qualidade na pesquisa: confiabilidade, credibilidade, transferibilidade e confirmabilidade. Há diversas pesquisas sobre qualidade em pesquisas qualitativas e, também, sobre triangulação, no entanto o principal diferencial deste trabalho foi a apresentação sistemática de tipologias de triangulação que permitiram aumentar a qualidade das pesquisas. O foco em "como" melhorar a qualidade, e não a qualidade em si, torna este artigo original. Como achados, destacaram-se os esforços para sistematizar e apresentar as guias para melhorar a credibilidade em pesquisas qualitativas por meio da estratégia de triangulação, apresentada em uma estrutura que permita ao leitor uma melhor compreensão desta proposta. A principal implicação deste trabalho converge, especialmente, para pesquisadores adotantes de pesquisa qualitativa, principalmente, por fornecer orientações sobre como melhorar a qualidade de suas pesquisas.Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)2018-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/57810.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018): January-April; 66-98Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 19 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro-Abril; 66-982358-09172177-6083reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)instacron:ANGRADenghttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578/pdfAbdalla, Márcio MoutinhoOliveira, Leonel Gois LimaAzevedo, Carlos Eduardo FrancoGonzalez, Rafael Kuramotoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-29T14:43:09Zoai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/578Revistahttp://angrad.org.br/revistaPRIhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/oaiangrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br2358-09172177-6083opendoar:2020-10-29T14:43:09Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
Qualidade em Pesquisa Qualitativa Organizacional: tipos de triangulação como alternativa metodológica
title Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
spellingShingle Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho
Triangulation
Qualitative Research
Reliability
Credibility
Confirmability
Triangulação
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Confiabilidade
Credibilidade
Confirmabilidade
title_short Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
title_full Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
title_fullStr Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
title_full_unstemmed Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
title_sort Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulation as a methodological alternative
author Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho
author_facet Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco
Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco
Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdalla, Márcio Moutinho
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
Azevedo, Carlos Eduardo Franco
Gonzalez, Rafael Kuramoto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Triangulation
Qualitative Research
Reliability
Credibility
Confirmability
Triangulação
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Confiabilidade
Credibilidade
Confirmabilidade
topic Triangulation
Qualitative Research
Reliability
Credibility
Confirmability
Triangulação
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Confiabilidade
Credibilidade
Confirmabilidade
description The dichotomous debate between objectivity and subjectivity in Social Sciences and the differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches in research are related to the strong demand for validation and accreditation of studies. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to discuss quality in qualitative research, through a systematic analysis of the typologies of triangulation strategy, highlighting the following quality dimensions in research: reliability, credibility, transferability and confirmability. There is a considerable amount of research about quality in qualitative research, as well as about triangulation. However, the main differentiator of this paper is the systematic presentation of triangulation typologies, which allow for the improvement of quality in qualitative research. The authors believe that the focus on "how to" improve quality, and not quality itself, makes this paper original. Among the main findings, it can be highlighted the effort to systematize and present guidelines in order to improve credibility in qualitative research, by means of the triangulation strategy presented in a framework that will allow the reader to have a better understanding of the proposals in this work. The authors understand that the main implication of this paper is mainly in providing guidance to researchers, particularly those dealing with qualitative research, on how they could improve the quality of their research.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578
10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578
url https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578
identifier_str_mv 10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/578/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018): January-April; 66-98
Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 19 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro-Abril; 66-98
2358-0917
2177-6083
reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
instacron:ANGRAD
instname_str Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
instacron_str ANGRAD
institution ANGRAD
reponame_str Administração (São Paulo. Online)
collection Administração (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv angrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br
_version_ 1754212519273037824