CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/381 |
Resumo: | Responding to institutional pressure to publish more papers, and in respected journals, management academics are seeking to increase their productivity by establishing co-authoring ties that speed up the process, from the initial stages of defining the research question to publication in a journal. Understanding the motives, benefits and hazards of co-authorship, especially using the experiences of highly reputed scholars, may help improve the efficiency and quality of research efforts. In this paper, we examine the responses to six questions sent to thirteen prolific international researchers, by email. In essence, we sought to understand such aspects as: the origins of co-authoring ties, the importance of having co-authors, the pitfalls of and methods for coordinating co-authorships, and what constitutes a contribution that warrants co-authorship. Results show that (1) international researchers evaluate their co-authorships positively, (2) many co-authorships emerge from prior supervision or personal proximity, more so than ties to the same institution, (3) the ordering of names is defined a priori and managed actively, (4) the benefits sought after are mainly specialization and complementary competences, (5) co-authorship is given based on actual contribution, albeit there are many forms of contribution, and (6) the pressure to publish, and an increasing difficulty of publishing in the top journals are the drivers of co-authorship. The analyses point to important insights for young Brazilian scholars. |
id |
ANGRAD-1_e0500478961bdbeb33e8a533d807f532 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/381 |
network_acronym_str |
ANGRAD-1 |
network_name_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEWA COAUTORIA EM ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: PERSPECTIVAS DE PESQUISADORES INTERNACIONAISco-authoringpublishingcollaborative researchpublishing in managementcoautoriapublicaçãopesquisa colaborativapublicar em AdministraçãoResponding to institutional pressure to publish more papers, and in respected journals, management academics are seeking to increase their productivity by establishing co-authoring ties that speed up the process, from the initial stages of defining the research question to publication in a journal. Understanding the motives, benefits and hazards of co-authorship, especially using the experiences of highly reputed scholars, may help improve the efficiency and quality of research efforts. In this paper, we examine the responses to six questions sent to thirteen prolific international researchers, by email. In essence, we sought to understand such aspects as: the origins of co-authoring ties, the importance of having co-authors, the pitfalls of and methods for coordinating co-authorships, and what constitutes a contribution that warrants co-authorship. Results show that (1) international researchers evaluate their co-authorships positively, (2) many co-authorships emerge from prior supervision or personal proximity, more so than ties to the same institution, (3) the ordering of names is defined a priori and managed actively, (4) the benefits sought after are mainly specialization and complementary competences, (5) co-authorship is given based on actual contribution, albeit there are many forms of contribution, and (6) the pressure to publish, and an increasing difficulty of publishing in the top journals are the drivers of co-authorship. The analyses point to important insights for young Brazilian scholars.Em resposta às pressões institucionais para publicar mais artigos e artigos com impacto, os pesquisadores procuram aumentar a sua produtividade estabelecendo relações de coautoria que acelerem o processo desde a fase inicial de formulação da questão de pesquisa até à publicação em periódico. Entender os motivos, benefícios e dificuldades nas coautorias, em especial usando as experiências de pesquisadores com alta reputação pode ajudar a melhorar a eficácia e qualidade dos esforços de pesquisa. Neste estudo foram analisadas as respostas a seis questões enviadas por e-mail a treze pesquisadores internacionais com alto número de publicações de impacto. Em essência, buscou-se entender aspectos como: a origem das relações de coautoria, a importância de ter coautores, as dificuldades e métodos na organização do trabalho em coautoria, e em que consiste uma contribuição que justifica a coautoria num artigo científico. Os resultados mostram que: (1) os pesquisadores internacionais avaliam positivamente as suas coautorias, (2) muitas coautorias emergem de relações de orientação anteriores ou por afinidade pessoal, mais que por ligação à mesma instituição, (3) a ordem da coautoria é gerida ou definida a priori e de forma ativa, (4) os benefícios relevam-se na especialização e complementaridade de competências, (5) a coautoria é atribuída em função da contribuição, ainda que existam múltiplas facetas que essa pode assumir, e (6) a pressão para publicar e a crescente dificuldade de publicar, em periódicos de topo está na gênese das colaborações. As análises apontam pistas importantes para os jovens pesquisadores brasileiros.Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/38110.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.381Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 663-694Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 663-6942358-09172177-6083reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)instacron:ANGRADporhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/381/192Ferreira, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal VasconcelosSerra, Fernando Ribeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-29T14:43:33Zoai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/381Revistahttp://angrad.org.br/revistaPRIhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/oaiangrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br2358-09172177-6083opendoar:2020-10-29T14:43:33Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW A COAUTORIA EM ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: PERSPECTIVAS DE PESQUISADORES INTERNACIONAIS |
title |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
spellingShingle |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW Ferreira, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos co-authoring publishing collaborative research publishing in management coautoria publicação pesquisa colaborativa publicar em Administração |
title_short |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
title_full |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
title_fullStr |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
title_full_unstemmed |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
title_sort |
CO-AUTHORING SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMICS’ POINTS OF VIEW |
author |
Ferreira, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos Serra, Fernando Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Serra, Fernando Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos Serra, Fernando Ribeiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
co-authoring publishing collaborative research publishing in management coautoria publicação pesquisa colaborativa publicar em Administração |
topic |
co-authoring publishing collaborative research publishing in management coautoria publicação pesquisa colaborativa publicar em Administração |
description |
Responding to institutional pressure to publish more papers, and in respected journals, management academics are seeking to increase their productivity by establishing co-authoring ties that speed up the process, from the initial stages of defining the research question to publication in a journal. Understanding the motives, benefits and hazards of co-authorship, especially using the experiences of highly reputed scholars, may help improve the efficiency and quality of research efforts. In this paper, we examine the responses to six questions sent to thirteen prolific international researchers, by email. In essence, we sought to understand such aspects as: the origins of co-authoring ties, the importance of having co-authors, the pitfalls of and methods for coordinating co-authorships, and what constitutes a contribution that warrants co-authorship. Results show that (1) international researchers evaluate their co-authorships positively, (2) many co-authorships emerge from prior supervision or personal proximity, more so than ties to the same institution, (3) the ordering of names is defined a priori and managed actively, (4) the benefits sought after are mainly specialization and complementary competences, (5) co-authorship is given based on actual contribution, albeit there are many forms of contribution, and (6) the pressure to publish, and an increasing difficulty of publishing in the top journals are the drivers of co-authorship. The analyses point to important insights for young Brazilian scholars. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/381 10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.381 |
url |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/381 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.381 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/381/192 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 663-694 Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 663-694 2358-0917 2177-6083 reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online) instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) instacron:ANGRAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
instacron_str |
ANGRAD |
institution |
ANGRAD |
reponame_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
angrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212518854656000 |