Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922021000100301 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Social management is a broad multidisciplinary field; thus, it requires consensus among scholars. This paper responds to two questions: What elements and categories are prioritized in social management studies by Brazilian scholars? Is there novelty in the elements of SM at the Brazilian approach or it is a superposition with other international perspectives? The methods were lexical analysis, descending hierarchical classification techniques, correspondence analysis, and similarity analysis. The hierarchical clustering of elements extracted from the literature from 1990 to 2019 reveals that the field of social management has six dimensions and originated from previous studies about social participation, governance, and others. Despite the criticism on the concept, there is consensus among Brazilian authors; however, few new ideas emerge, showing a slow grown in the field, besides a low internationalization level. The advance of the praxis is minimizing the level of abstraction; Brazilian scholars defend the triad society, state, and market, but their studies focused more on state and society. On the contrary, international studies recognized the role of firms in social management. The differentiation of the Brazilian perspective of social management is a cognitive citizenship, educational and pedagogical process. |
id |
ANPAD-1_9bc93bcb1309478877d779ebde21a279 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922021000100301 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approachessocial managementcategoriesdescending hierarchical classificationIRAMUTEQABSTRACT Social management is a broad multidisciplinary field; thus, it requires consensus among scholars. This paper responds to two questions: What elements and categories are prioritized in social management studies by Brazilian scholars? Is there novelty in the elements of SM at the Brazilian approach or it is a superposition with other international perspectives? The methods were lexical analysis, descending hierarchical classification techniques, correspondence analysis, and similarity analysis. The hierarchical clustering of elements extracted from the literature from 1990 to 2019 reveals that the field of social management has six dimensions and originated from previous studies about social participation, governance, and others. Despite the criticism on the concept, there is consensus among Brazilian authors; however, few new ideas emerge, showing a slow grown in the field, besides a low internationalization level. The advance of the praxis is minimizing the level of abstraction; Brazilian scholars defend the triad society, state, and market, but their studies focused more on state and society. On the contrary, international studies recognized the role of firms in social management. The differentiation of the Brazilian perspective of social management is a cognitive citizenship, educational and pedagogical process.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922021000100301BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.18 n.1 2021reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1807-7692bar2021190110info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira-Ribeiro,RodrigoFumi Chim-Miki,Adrianade Araújo Machado,Petruskaeng2021-07-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922021000100301Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2021-07-29T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
title |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
spellingShingle |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches Oliveira-Ribeiro,Rodrigo social management categories descending hierarchical classification IRAMUTEQ |
title_short |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
title_full |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
title_fullStr |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
title_sort |
Assumptions of Social Management in the Brazilian Perspective: A Parallel with International Approaches |
author |
Oliveira-Ribeiro,Rodrigo |
author_facet |
Oliveira-Ribeiro,Rodrigo Fumi Chim-Miki,Adriana de Araújo Machado,Petruska |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fumi Chim-Miki,Adriana de Araújo Machado,Petruska |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira-Ribeiro,Rodrigo Fumi Chim-Miki,Adriana de Araújo Machado,Petruska |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
social management categories descending hierarchical classification IRAMUTEQ |
topic |
social management categories descending hierarchical classification IRAMUTEQ |
description |
ABSTRACT Social management is a broad multidisciplinary field; thus, it requires consensus among scholars. This paper responds to two questions: What elements and categories are prioritized in social management studies by Brazilian scholars? Is there novelty in the elements of SM at the Brazilian approach or it is a superposition with other international perspectives? The methods were lexical analysis, descending hierarchical classification techniques, correspondence analysis, and similarity analysis. The hierarchical clustering of elements extracted from the literature from 1990 to 2019 reveals that the field of social management has six dimensions and originated from previous studies about social participation, governance, and others. Despite the criticism on the concept, there is consensus among Brazilian authors; however, few new ideas emerge, showing a slow grown in the field, besides a low internationalization level. The advance of the praxis is minimizing the level of abstraction; Brazilian scholars defend the triad society, state, and market, but their studies focused more on state and society. On the contrary, international studies recognized the role of firms in social management. The differentiation of the Brazilian perspective of social management is a cognitive citizenship, educational and pedagogical process. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922021000100301 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922021000100301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-7692bar2021190110 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.18 n.1 2021 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209124215685120 |