New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000100007 |
Resumo: | This research investigated the underuse of technological tools by innovative organizations which are acknowledged for their use of and familiarity with new technologies. The research conducted an analysis of 58 institutional repositories (IRs) out of 43 educational and research institutions which are internationally renowned for excellence. The core aspect of the analysis was the use of IRs for publishing and dealing with evidence in order to legitimize and add value to scientific research. The following items were analyzed: (a) the logical structuring of scientific communication published in the IRs; (b) the metadata which describe scientific communication based on the terms of the DCMI protocol used; (c) the availability of software functions which facilitate the queries and publication of evidences. Results show that the introduction of IRs did not add value to the quality of research in\ terms of associating and publishing evidence that could back them up. A strong tendency to replicate the traditional library model of physical collections was observed. It was concluded that merely possessing good technological tools is not sufficient for fostering innovation and strategic gains in organizations, even if their implementation takes place in highly promising and favorable environments. |
id |
ANPAD-1_a6de3f9114db72a86d0d9e541282ba76 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922012000100007 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovationinstitutional repositoryresearch evidenceresearch communicationDSpaceThis research investigated the underuse of technological tools by innovative organizations which are acknowledged for their use of and familiarity with new technologies. The research conducted an analysis of 58 institutional repositories (IRs) out of 43 educational and research institutions which are internationally renowned for excellence. The core aspect of the analysis was the use of IRs for publishing and dealing with evidence in order to legitimize and add value to scientific research. The following items were analyzed: (a) the logical structuring of scientific communication published in the IRs; (b) the metadata which describe scientific communication based on the terms of the DCMI protocol used; (c) the availability of software functions which facilitate the queries and publication of evidences. Results show that the introduction of IRs did not add value to the quality of research in\ terms of associating and publishing evidence that could back them up. A strong tendency to replicate the traditional library model of physical collections was observed. It was concluded that merely possessing good technological tools is not sufficient for fostering innovation and strategic gains in organizations, even if their implementation takes place in highly promising and favorable environments.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000100007BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.9 n.1 2012reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/S1807-76922012000100007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDe Sordi,José OsvaldoMeireles,ManuelValentim,Marta Lígia Pomimeng2012-01-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922012000100007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2012-01-26T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
title |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
spellingShingle |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation De Sordi,José Osvaldo institutional repository research evidence research communication DSpace |
title_short |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
title_full |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
title_fullStr |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
title_full_unstemmed |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
title_sort |
New technologies, old habits: automation without innovation |
author |
De Sordi,José Osvaldo |
author_facet |
De Sordi,José Osvaldo Meireles,Manuel Valentim,Marta Lígia Pomim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meireles,Manuel Valentim,Marta Lígia Pomim |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
De Sordi,José Osvaldo Meireles,Manuel Valentim,Marta Lígia Pomim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
institutional repository research evidence research communication DSpace |
topic |
institutional repository research evidence research communication DSpace |
description |
This research investigated the underuse of technological tools by innovative organizations which are acknowledged for their use of and familiarity with new technologies. The research conducted an analysis of 58 institutional repositories (IRs) out of 43 educational and research institutions which are internationally renowned for excellence. The core aspect of the analysis was the use of IRs for publishing and dealing with evidence in order to legitimize and add value to scientific research. The following items were analyzed: (a) the logical structuring of scientific communication published in the IRs; (b) the metadata which describe scientific communication based on the terms of the DCMI protocol used; (c) the availability of software functions which facilitate the queries and publication of evidences. Results show that the introduction of IRs did not add value to the quality of research in\ terms of associating and publishing evidence that could back them up. A strong tendency to replicate the traditional library model of physical collections was observed. It was concluded that merely possessing good technological tools is not sufficient for fostering innovation and strategic gains in organizations, even if their implementation takes place in highly promising and favorable environments. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000100007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000100007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-76922012000100007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.9 n.1 2012 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209123303424000 |