Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scholl, Ana Paula
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fontes, Ana Beatriz Arêas da Luz, Finger, Ingrid
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1506
Resumo: Research with bilinguals apply different measures to assess proficiency, one of them being language background questionnaires, which include questions about individuals’ experience and self-rated proficiency. Studies suggest that bilinguals can report their proficiency consistently with objective measures (MARIAN et al., 2007; LUK et al., 2013; GERTKEN et al., 2014; BRANTMEIR et al., 2012). Within this context, the goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship between two distinct measures of proficiency. In order to do so, we correlated participants’ self-rated proficiency (N = 112) in the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (QuExPLi - Questionário de Experiência e Proficiência Linguística) with their scores on the TOEFL ITP. We also carried out a simple linear regression between the mean scores of the two measures. Results show a significant weak correlation between participants’ self-rated proficiency and their scores on the TOEFL ITP, as well as a significant regression equation. Also, when the scores on individual skills were correlated with participants’ self-rated proficiency on those skills (N = 16), significant moderate to strong correlations were found. These results add to research that have found that bilinguals are able to report their proficiency accurately; however, more studies in different contexts are needed.
id ANPOLL-2_8977f670146aff1a429a5580e1e0f491
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1506
network_acronym_str ANPOLL-2
network_name_str Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measuresBilíngues conseguem avaliar com precisão a sua proficiência em um questionário de histórico da linguagem? Uma correlação entre medidas de proficiência autoavaliada e objetivaProficiencySelf-rated ProficiencyLanguage Background QuestionnaireProficiênciaProficiência AutoavaliadaQuestionário de Histórico da LinguagemResearch with bilinguals apply different measures to assess proficiency, one of them being language background questionnaires, which include questions about individuals’ experience and self-rated proficiency. Studies suggest that bilinguals can report their proficiency consistently with objective measures (MARIAN et al., 2007; LUK et al., 2013; GERTKEN et al., 2014; BRANTMEIR et al., 2012). Within this context, the goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship between two distinct measures of proficiency. In order to do so, we correlated participants’ self-rated proficiency (N = 112) in the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (QuExPLi - Questionário de Experiência e Proficiência Linguística) with their scores on the TOEFL ITP. We also carried out a simple linear regression between the mean scores of the two measures. Results show a significant weak correlation between participants’ self-rated proficiency and their scores on the TOEFL ITP, as well as a significant regression equation. Also, when the scores on individual skills were correlated with participants’ self-rated proficiency on those skills (N = 16), significant moderate to strong correlations were found. These results add to research that have found that bilinguals are able to report their proficiency accurately; however, more studies in different contexts are needed.Pesquisas com bilíngues aplicam diferentes medidas para avaliar proficiência, uma delas são os questionários de histórico da linguagem, que incluem perguntas sobre a experiência dos indivíduos e a sua proficiência auto-avaliada. Estudos sugerem que bilíngues conseguem relatar a sua proficiência de forma consistente com medidas objetivas (MARIAN et al., 2007; LUK et al., 2013; GERTKEN et al., 2014; BRANTMEIR et al., 2012). Nesse contexto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a relação entre duas medidas distintas de proficiência. Para isso, correlacionamos a autoavaliação de proficiência dos participantes (N = 112) no Questionário de Experiência e Proficiência Linguística (QuExPLi) com as suas pontuações no TOEFL ITP. Também realizamos uma regressão linear simples entre os escores médios das duas medidas. Os resultados mostram uma correlação fraca e significativa entre a proficiência autoavaliada dos participantes e suas pontuações no TOEFL ITP, bem como uma equação de regressão significativa. Além disso, quando as pontuações nas habilidades individuais foram correlacionadas com a proficiência autoavaliada dos participantes nessas habilidades (N = 16), correlações significativas moderadas a fortes foram encontradas. Esses resultados se somam a pesquisas que encontraram dados de que bilíngues são capazes de relatar sua proficiência com precisão. No entanto, mais estudos em diferentes contextos são necessários.ANPOLL2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/150610.18309/ranpoll.v52i1.1506Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 52 No. 1 (2021): Language Studies; 142-161Revista da Anpoll; v. 52 n. 1 (2021): Estudos Linguísticos; 142-1611982-78301414-756410.18309/ranpoll.v52i1reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)instacron:ANPOLLenghttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1506/1159Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Anpollhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScholl, Ana PaulaFontes, Ana Beatriz Arêas da LuzFinger, Ingrid2021-05-31T22:59:41Zoai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1506Revistahttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/indexONGhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oairevistadaanpoll@gmail.com1982-78301414-7564opendoar:2023-01-13T09:48:55.162787Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
Bilíngues conseguem avaliar com precisão a sua proficiência em um questionário de histórico da linguagem? Uma correlação entre medidas de proficiência autoavaliada e objetiva
title Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
spellingShingle Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
Scholl, Ana Paula
Proficiency
Self-rated Proficiency
Language Background Questionnaire
Proficiência
Proficiência Autoavaliada
Questionário de Histórico da Linguagem
title_short Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
title_full Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
title_fullStr Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
title_full_unstemmed Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
title_sort Can bilinguals rate their proficiency accurately in a language background questionnaire? A correlation between self-rated and objective proficiency measures
author Scholl, Ana Paula
author_facet Scholl, Ana Paula
Fontes, Ana Beatriz Arêas da Luz
Finger, Ingrid
author_role author
author2 Fontes, Ana Beatriz Arêas da Luz
Finger, Ingrid
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scholl, Ana Paula
Fontes, Ana Beatriz Arêas da Luz
Finger, Ingrid
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Proficiency
Self-rated Proficiency
Language Background Questionnaire
Proficiência
Proficiência Autoavaliada
Questionário de Histórico da Linguagem
topic Proficiency
Self-rated Proficiency
Language Background Questionnaire
Proficiência
Proficiência Autoavaliada
Questionário de Histórico da Linguagem
description Research with bilinguals apply different measures to assess proficiency, one of them being language background questionnaires, which include questions about individuals’ experience and self-rated proficiency. Studies suggest that bilinguals can report their proficiency consistently with objective measures (MARIAN et al., 2007; LUK et al., 2013; GERTKEN et al., 2014; BRANTMEIR et al., 2012). Within this context, the goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship between two distinct measures of proficiency. In order to do so, we correlated participants’ self-rated proficiency (N = 112) in the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (QuExPLi - Questionário de Experiência e Proficiência Linguística) with their scores on the TOEFL ITP. We also carried out a simple linear regression between the mean scores of the two measures. Results show a significant weak correlation between participants’ self-rated proficiency and their scores on the TOEFL ITP, as well as a significant regression equation. Also, when the scores on individual skills were correlated with participants’ self-rated proficiency on those skills (N = 16), significant moderate to strong correlations were found. These results add to research that have found that bilinguals are able to report their proficiency accurately; however, more studies in different contexts are needed.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1506
10.18309/ranpoll.v52i1.1506
url https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1506
identifier_str_mv 10.18309/ranpoll.v52i1.1506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1506/1159
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Anpoll
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Anpoll
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPOLL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPOLL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 52 No. 1 (2021): Language Studies; 142-161
Revista da Anpoll; v. 52 n. 1 (2021): Estudos Linguísticos; 142-161
1982-7830
1414-7564
10.18309/ranpoll.v52i1
reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
instacron:ANPOLL
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
instacron_str ANPOLL
institution ANPOLL
reponame_str Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
collection Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaanpoll@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051176575827968