Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camargo Neto,Lauro de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Paulino,Eleri Rafael Muniz, Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2022000100303
Resumo: Abstract Command and control instruments for the conservation of nature on private property are widely considered to be costly and inefficient at achieving significant conservation. In the city of Bonito (MS), an initiative called “Projeto Formoso Vivo”, aimed at the protection of native vegetation, sought to promote rural techniques that significantly aid the protection and restoration of Permanent Preservation Areas and Legal Reserves in Brazil. The aim of this article is to analyze the reach of this project from landholders’ perspective, focusing on the adequacy of rural properties to the current legal-environmental regime for native vegetation protection. Qualitative analysis was conducted through a series of interviews to gauge respondent’s perceptions of the “Projeto Formoso Vivo” initiative. Results show that all respondents recognized the importance of the project and consider it possible to reconcile the economic value of private properties with the requirements of areas destined for conservation.
id ANPPAS-1_5a70cb626fdc4f4021a92ced3986014d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1414-753X2022000100303
network_acronym_str ANPPAS-1
network_name_str Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?Environmental policyforest legislationconservation on private landBrazilForest CodeAbstract Command and control instruments for the conservation of nature on private property are widely considered to be costly and inefficient at achieving significant conservation. In the city of Bonito (MS), an initiative called “Projeto Formoso Vivo”, aimed at the protection of native vegetation, sought to promote rural techniques that significantly aid the protection and restoration of Permanent Preservation Areas and Legal Reserves in Brazil. The aim of this article is to analyze the reach of this project from landholders’ perspective, focusing on the adequacy of rural properties to the current legal-environmental regime for native vegetation protection. Qualitative analysis was conducted through a series of interviews to gauge respondent’s perceptions of the “Projeto Formoso Vivo” initiative. Results show that all respondents recognized the importance of the project and consider it possible to reconcile the economic value of private properties with the requirements of areas destined for conservation.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2022000100303Ambiente & Sociedade v.25 2022reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210024r1vu2022l1aoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamargo Neto,Lauro dePaulino,Eleri Rafael MunizRanieri,Victor Eduardo Limaeng2022-04-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2022000100303Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2022-04-11T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
title Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
spellingShingle Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
Camargo Neto,Lauro de
Environmental policy
forest legislation
conservation on private land
Brazil
Forest Code
title_short Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
title_full Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
title_fullStr Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
title_full_unstemmed Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
title_sort Do command and control instruments for nature conservation on private property always fail?
author Camargo Neto,Lauro de
author_facet Camargo Neto,Lauro de
Paulino,Eleri Rafael Muniz
Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima
author_role author
author2 Paulino,Eleri Rafael Muniz
Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camargo Neto,Lauro de
Paulino,Eleri Rafael Muniz
Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental policy
forest legislation
conservation on private land
Brazil
Forest Code
topic Environmental policy
forest legislation
conservation on private land
Brazil
Forest Code
description Abstract Command and control instruments for the conservation of nature on private property are widely considered to be costly and inefficient at achieving significant conservation. In the city of Bonito (MS), an initiative called “Projeto Formoso Vivo”, aimed at the protection of native vegetation, sought to promote rural techniques that significantly aid the protection and restoration of Permanent Preservation Areas and Legal Reserves in Brazil. The aim of this article is to analyze the reach of this project from landholders’ perspective, focusing on the adequacy of rural properties to the current legal-environmental regime for native vegetation protection. Qualitative analysis was conducted through a series of interviews to gauge respondent’s perceptions of the “Projeto Formoso Vivo” initiative. Results show that all respondents recognized the importance of the project and consider it possible to reconcile the economic value of private properties with the requirements of areas destined for conservation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2022000100303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2022000100303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210024r1vu2022l1ao
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ambiente & Sociedade v.25 2022
reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:ANPPAS
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str ANPPAS
institution ANPPAS
reponame_str Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
collection Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com
_version_ 1754209167411773440