Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100344 |
Resumo: | Abstract Public transparency is important for society to increase confidence in public authorities, democratically participate in decisions, and monitor governmental actions related to environmental control. This study aimed to analyze the benefits and problems/risks associated with information disclosure about private land conservation in the context of the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR, its Portuguese acronym). A systematic review about public transparency in private land conservation was performed. The selected articles went through Content Analysis, resulting in lists with public transparency benefits and problems, which based the questionnaires applied to CAR stakeholders. The main problem identified was the landowners’ fear of declared information use, while the main benefit was the contribution to the effectiveness of conservation programs. Thus, the social function of private property justifies the hierarchical disclosure of information. |
id |
ANPPAS-1_7b97f6412b8030cea32f5c179c453095 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000100344 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPAS-1 |
network_name_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry dataInformation accessRural Environmental RegistryPrivate land conservationForest LegislationPublic transparencyAbstract Public transparency is important for society to increase confidence in public authorities, democratically participate in decisions, and monitor governmental actions related to environmental control. This study aimed to analyze the benefits and problems/risks associated with information disclosure about private land conservation in the context of the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR, its Portuguese acronym). A systematic review about public transparency in private land conservation was performed. The selected articles went through Content Analysis, resulting in lists with public transparency benefits and problems, which based the questionnaires applied to CAR stakeholders. The main problem identified was the landowners’ fear of declared information use, while the main benefit was the contribution to the effectiveness of conservation programs. Thus, the social function of private property justifies the hierarchical disclosure of information.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100344Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200041r1vu2021l5aoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVerdasca,StellaRanieri,Victor Eduardo Limaeng2021-12-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2021000100344Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2021-12-03T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
title |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
spellingShingle |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data Verdasca,Stella Information access Rural Environmental Registry Private land conservation Forest Legislation Public transparency |
title_short |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
title_full |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
title_fullStr |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
title_sort |
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data |
author |
Verdasca,Stella |
author_facet |
Verdasca,Stella Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Verdasca,Stella Ranieri,Victor Eduardo Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Information access Rural Environmental Registry Private land conservation Forest Legislation Public transparency |
topic |
Information access Rural Environmental Registry Private land conservation Forest Legislation Public transparency |
description |
Abstract Public transparency is important for society to increase confidence in public authorities, democratically participate in decisions, and monitor governmental actions related to environmental control. This study aimed to analyze the benefits and problems/risks associated with information disclosure about private land conservation in the context of the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR, its Portuguese acronym). A systematic review about public transparency in private land conservation was performed. The selected articles went through Content Analysis, resulting in lists with public transparency benefits and problems, which based the questionnaires applied to CAR stakeholders. The main problem identified was the landowners’ fear of declared information use, while the main benefit was the contribution to the effectiveness of conservation programs. Thus, the social function of private property justifies the hierarchical disclosure of information. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100344 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2021000100344 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200041r1vu2021l5ao |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade v.24 2021 reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:ANPPAS |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
ANPPAS |
institution |
ANPPAS |
reponame_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754209167378219008 |