ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Júnior,Roberto Donato da
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Biase,Laura De, Martellini,Francisco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100324
Resumo: Abstract We intend to problematize the agroecological “dialogue of knowledge” and survey the conditions of anthropology for such problems. The fundamental argument is that, despite the proposal of non-hierarchical construction of agroecological knowledge (between “scientific” and “non-scientific” knowledge), its epistemological basis does not comprises the complex interactions produced among the agents in question, ambivalently contributing to a hierarchical and asymmetric relationship of power. We suggest that: the idea that agroecology promotes harmonious relations between scientists and farmers simplifies interactions tensioned by the dynamic approximation/estrangement; the conception of culture and cultural diversity implicit in the dialogue of knowledge is based on the dissociation between “thought” and “action”; a “political dynamics of alterity” would better define the agroecological relational scheme; the anthropological conception of translation would contribute to the promotion of a “double extensionality,” not based on the capacity to teach, but rather on the capacity to learn.
id ANPPAS-1_c59f309a0449c12c1935e4dcde369fff
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1414-753X2019000100324
network_acronym_str ANPPAS-1
network_name_str Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGYagroecologytranslationdialogue of knowledgedouble extensionalityinterdisciplinarityAbstract We intend to problematize the agroecological “dialogue of knowledge” and survey the conditions of anthropology for such problems. The fundamental argument is that, despite the proposal of non-hierarchical construction of agroecological knowledge (between “scientific” and “non-scientific” knowledge), its epistemological basis does not comprises the complex interactions produced among the agents in question, ambivalently contributing to a hierarchical and asymmetric relationship of power. We suggest that: the idea that agroecology promotes harmonious relations between scientists and farmers simplifies interactions tensioned by the dynamic approximation/estrangement; the conception of culture and cultural diversity implicit in the dialogue of knowledge is based on the dissociation between “thought” and “action”; a “political dynamics of alterity” would better define the agroecological relational scheme; the anthropological conception of translation would contribute to the promotion of a “double extensionality,” not based on the capacity to teach, but rather on the capacity to learn.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100324Ambiente & Sociedade v.22 2019reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc0060r1vu19l4aoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Júnior,Roberto Donato daBiase,Laura DeMartellini,Franciscoeng2019-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2019000100324Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2019-11-27T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
title ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
spellingShingle ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
Silva Júnior,Roberto Donato da
agroecology
translation
dialogue of knowledge
double extensionality
interdisciplinarity
title_short ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
title_full ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
title_fullStr ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
title_full_unstemmed ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
title_sort ON DIALOGUES AND EXISTENCES: A POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION OF ANTHROPOLOGY TO AGROECOLOGY
author Silva Júnior,Roberto Donato da
author_facet Silva Júnior,Roberto Donato da
Biase,Laura De
Martellini,Francisco
author_role author
author2 Biase,Laura De
Martellini,Francisco
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Júnior,Roberto Donato da
Biase,Laura De
Martellini,Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agroecology
translation
dialogue of knowledge
double extensionality
interdisciplinarity
topic agroecology
translation
dialogue of knowledge
double extensionality
interdisciplinarity
description Abstract We intend to problematize the agroecological “dialogue of knowledge” and survey the conditions of anthropology for such problems. The fundamental argument is that, despite the proposal of non-hierarchical construction of agroecological knowledge (between “scientific” and “non-scientific” knowledge), its epistemological basis does not comprises the complex interactions produced among the agents in question, ambivalently contributing to a hierarchical and asymmetric relationship of power. We suggest that: the idea that agroecology promotes harmonious relations between scientists and farmers simplifies interactions tensioned by the dynamic approximation/estrangement; the conception of culture and cultural diversity implicit in the dialogue of knowledge is based on the dissociation between “thought” and “action”; a “political dynamics of alterity” would better define the agroecological relational scheme; the anthropological conception of translation would contribute to the promotion of a “double extensionality,” not based on the capacity to teach, but rather on the capacity to learn.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100324
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2019000100324
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4422asoc0060r1vu19l4ao
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ambiente & Sociedade v.22 2019
reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:ANPPAS
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str ANPPAS
institution ANPPAS
reponame_str Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
collection Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com
_version_ 1754209166936768512