Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648 |
Resumo: | Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems. |
id |
ANPPGA-1_13353bb8b6f6ce6c9634ce782e794320 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-65552017000500648 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPGA-1 |
network_name_str |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistantsjudiciarycourt managementjudgesproductioncaseload.Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.21 n.5 2017reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes,Adalmir OliveiraGuimaraes,Tomas AquinoAkutsu,Luizeng2017-08-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552017000500648Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2017-08-29T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
title |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
spellingShingle |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira judiciary court management judges production caseload. |
title_short |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
title_full |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
title_fullStr |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
title_sort |
Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants |
author |
Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira |
author_facet |
Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino Akutsu,Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino Akutsu,Luiz |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino Akutsu,Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
judiciary court management judges production caseload. |
topic |
judiciary court management judges production caseload. |
description |
Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.21 n.5 2017 reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
collection |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rac@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209053283713024 |