Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino, Akutsu,Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648
Resumo: Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems.
id ANPPGA-1_13353bb8b6f6ce6c9634ce782e794320
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-65552017000500648
network_acronym_str ANPPGA-1
network_name_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistantsjudiciarycourt managementjudgesproductioncaseload.Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems.Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.21 n.5 2017reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes,Adalmir OliveiraGuimaraes,Tomas AquinoAkutsu,Luizeng2017-08-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-65552017000500648Revistahttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/racONGhttps://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/oairac@anpad.org.br1982-78491415-6555opendoar:2017-08-29T00:00RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
title Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
spellingShingle Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira
judiciary
court management
judges
production
caseload.
title_short Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
title_full Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
title_fullStr Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
title_full_unstemmed Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
title_sort Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants
author Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira
author_facet Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira
Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino
Akutsu,Luiz
author_role author
author2 Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino
Akutsu,Luiz
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes,Adalmir Oliveira
Guimaraes,Tomas Aquino
Akutsu,Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv judiciary
court management
judges
production
caseload.
topic judiciary
court management
judges
production
caseload.
description Abstract Court caseload management is of key importance for guaranteeing the adjudication of cases and depends on how judges and administrative assistants deal with their workload. Results from several studies indicate that an increase in court caseload tends to generate an increase in the judge’s production. However, some authors argue that this relationship is far more complex. To develop a fuller understanding of this relationship we tested an array of direct and moderating hypotheses. We used secondary data from 566 judges working in first trial courts in the State Justice System of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The results indicate a direct and positive relationship between court caseload and judge production, but the strength of this relationship depends on court specialty. The findings also indicate that the number of administrative assistants, judge experience and the number of places a judge works all moderate the caseload-production relationship. The results contribute to the development of strategies to address the delays and congestion of courts, two of the main Brazilian Judiciary problems.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-65552017000500648
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Contemporânea v.21 n.5 2017
reponame:RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
collection RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rac@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209053283713024