For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista história hoje |
Texto Completo: | https://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/863 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to analyze the debate about gender ideology and teaching in Brazil emphasizing its articulation with some aspects of the rationality of neoliberalism. Concerning Wendy Brown’s critic about the role of “family” in the affirmation of neoliberal’s political project we will consider how the defense of liberty and family has become fundamentals for the allegation of the existence of a gender ideology on education threatening the moral and tradition. This research was achieved by the analysis of the debates in the Assembly of the State of Rio de Janeiro (ALERJ), between 2014 and 2018. |
id |
ANPUH-2_813aeebf236277af3fe1640d7559f207 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/863 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPUH-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista história hoje |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender IdeologyPela família e pela liberdade: aspectos da racionalidade neoliberal no debate sobre a ideologia de gêneroIdeologia de gêneroNeoliberalismoPlanos de EducaçãoDemocraciaGender ideologyNeoliberalismEducational plansDemocracyThis paper aims to analyze the debate about gender ideology and teaching in Brazil emphasizing its articulation with some aspects of the rationality of neoliberalism. Concerning Wendy Brown’s critic about the role of “family” in the affirmation of neoliberal’s political project we will consider how the defense of liberty and family has become fundamentals for the allegation of the existence of a gender ideology on education threatening the moral and tradition. This research was achieved by the analysis of the debates in the Assembly of the State of Rio de Janeiro (ALERJ), between 2014 and 2018.Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar odebate sobre a ideologia de gênero e oensino no Brasil contemporâneo, comênfase na sua articulação com aspectosda racionalidade neoliberal. Partimos dacrítica de Wendy Brown sobre o papel dafamília na afirmação do projeto políticoneoliberal e avaliamos como a defesa daliberdade e da família se tornaram fundamentosda alegação de que existiria umaideologia de gênero na educação, ameaçandoa moral e a tradição. Esta pesquisafoi realizada por meio da análise do debateparlamentar na Assembleia Legislativado Estado do Rio de Janeiro(ALERJ), entre os anos de 2014 e 2018.Associação Nacional de História - ANPUH-Brasil2022-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo de Dossiêapplication/pdfhttps://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/86310.20949/rhhj.v11i22.863Revista História Hoje; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-125Revista História Hoje; Vol. 11 Núm. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-125Revista História Hoje; v. 11 n. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-1251806-399310.20949/rhhj.v11i22reponame:Revista história hojeinstname:Associação Nacional de História (ANPUH)instacron:ANPUHporhttps://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/863/437Copyright (c) 2022 Géssica Góes Guimarãeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães, Géssica Góes2023-06-09T17:32:16Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/863Revistahttps://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/indexONGhttps://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/oairhhjeditor@anpuh.org1806-39931806-3993opendoar:2023-06-09T17:32:16Revista história hoje - Associação Nacional de História (ANPUH)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology Pela família e pela liberdade: aspectos da racionalidade neoliberal no debate sobre a ideologia de gênero |
title |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
spellingShingle |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology Guimarães, Géssica Góes Ideologia de gênero Neoliberalismo Planos de Educação Democracia Gender ideology Neoliberalism Educational plans Democracy |
title_short |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
title_full |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
title_fullStr |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
title_full_unstemmed |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
title_sort |
For the Family and for Liberty: Aspects of Neoliberal Rationality in the Debate on Gender Ideology |
author |
Guimarães, Géssica Góes |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Géssica Góes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Géssica Góes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ideologia de gênero Neoliberalismo Planos de Educação Democracia Gender ideology Neoliberalism Educational plans Democracy |
topic |
Ideologia de gênero Neoliberalismo Planos de Educação Democracia Gender ideology Neoliberalism Educational plans Democracy |
description |
This paper aims to analyze the debate about gender ideology and teaching in Brazil emphasizing its articulation with some aspects of the rationality of neoliberalism. Concerning Wendy Brown’s critic about the role of “family” in the affirmation of neoliberal’s political project we will consider how the defense of liberty and family has become fundamentals for the allegation of the existence of a gender ideology on education threatening the moral and tradition. This research was achieved by the analysis of the debates in the Assembly of the State of Rio de Janeiro (ALERJ), between 2014 and 2018. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo de Dossiê |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/863 10.20949/rhhj.v11i22.863 |
url |
https://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/863 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20949/rhhj.v11i22.863 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rhhj.anpuh.org/RHHJ/article/view/863/437 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Géssica Góes Guimarães http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Géssica Góes Guimarães http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de História - ANPUH-Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de História - ANPUH-Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista História Hoje; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-125 Revista História Hoje; Vol. 11 Núm. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-125 Revista História Hoje; v. 11 n. 22 (2022): Janeiro-Junho; 101-125 1806-3993 10.20949/rhhj.v11i22 reponame:Revista história hoje instname:Associação Nacional de História (ANPUH) instacron:ANPUH |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de História (ANPUH) |
instacron_str |
ANPUH |
institution |
ANPUH |
reponame_str |
Revista história hoje |
collection |
Revista história hoje |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista história hoje - Associação Nacional de História (ANPUH) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rhhjeditor@anpuh.org |
_version_ |
1798315287729143808 |