Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tovaruela-Carrión,Natalia
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: López-López,Daniel, Losa-Iglesias,Marta Elena, Álvarez-Ruíz,Verónica, Melero-González,Gemma, Calvo-Lobo,César, Becerro-de Bengoa-Vallejo,Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500464
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Metatarsalgia can be considered to be a common complaint in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between participants with different metatarsalgia types and matched-paired healthy controls. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis on a sample of 124 participants of median age ± interquartile range of 55 ± 22 years was carried out in the University Clinic of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Ferrol, Spain. They presented primary (n = 31), secondary (n = 31) or iatrogenic (n = 31) metatarsalgia, or were matched-paired healthy controls (n = 31). METHODS: Self-reported domain scores were obtained using the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) and were compared between the participants with metatarsalgia and between these and the healthy controls. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were shown in all FHSQ domains (P ≤ 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the metatarsalgia types in relation to the matched healthy control group, such that the participants with metatarsalgia presented impaired foot-specific and general health-related QoL (lower FHSQ scores). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that presence of metatarsalgia had a negative impact on foot health-related QoL. Foot-specific health and general health were poorer among patients with metatarsalgia, especially among those with secondary and iatrogenic metatarsalgia, in comparison with matched healthy controls.
id APM-1_83bf2efc50718c02bcd2225779062e1e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802018000500464
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysisFoot deformitiesFoot diseasesMetatarsalgiaQuality of lifeABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Metatarsalgia can be considered to be a common complaint in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between participants with different metatarsalgia types and matched-paired healthy controls. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis on a sample of 124 participants of median age ± interquartile range of 55 ± 22 years was carried out in the University Clinic of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Ferrol, Spain. They presented primary (n = 31), secondary (n = 31) or iatrogenic (n = 31) metatarsalgia, or were matched-paired healthy controls (n = 31). METHODS: Self-reported domain scores were obtained using the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) and were compared between the participants with metatarsalgia and between these and the healthy controls. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were shown in all FHSQ domains (P ≤ 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the metatarsalgia types in relation to the matched healthy control group, such that the participants with metatarsalgia presented impaired foot-specific and general health-related QoL (lower FHSQ scores). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that presence of metatarsalgia had a negative impact on foot health-related QoL. Foot-specific health and general health were poorer among patients with metatarsalgia, especially among those with secondary and iatrogenic metatarsalgia, in comparison with matched healthy controls.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500464Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.5 2018reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.0220190918info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTovaruela-Carrión,NataliaLópez-López,DanielLosa-Iglesias,Marta ElenaÁlvarez-Ruíz,VerónicaMelero-González,GemmaCalvo-Lobo,CésarBecerro-de Bengoa-Vallejo,Ricardoeng2018-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802018000500464Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2018-12-17T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
title Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
spellingShingle Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
Tovaruela-Carrión,Natalia
Foot deformities
Foot diseases
Metatarsalgia
Quality of life
title_short Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
title_sort Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with different metatarsalgia types and matched healthy controls: a cross-sectional analysis
author Tovaruela-Carrión,Natalia
author_facet Tovaruela-Carrión,Natalia
López-López,Daniel
Losa-Iglesias,Marta Elena
Álvarez-Ruíz,Verónica
Melero-González,Gemma
Calvo-Lobo,César
Becerro-de Bengoa-Vallejo,Ricardo
author_role author
author2 López-López,Daniel
Losa-Iglesias,Marta Elena
Álvarez-Ruíz,Verónica
Melero-González,Gemma
Calvo-Lobo,César
Becerro-de Bengoa-Vallejo,Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tovaruela-Carrión,Natalia
López-López,Daniel
Losa-Iglesias,Marta Elena
Álvarez-Ruíz,Verónica
Melero-González,Gemma
Calvo-Lobo,César
Becerro-de Bengoa-Vallejo,Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Foot deformities
Foot diseases
Metatarsalgia
Quality of life
topic Foot deformities
Foot diseases
Metatarsalgia
Quality of life
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Metatarsalgia can be considered to be a common complaint in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) between participants with different metatarsalgia types and matched-paired healthy controls. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis on a sample of 124 participants of median age ± interquartile range of 55 ± 22 years was carried out in the University Clinic of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Ferrol, Spain. They presented primary (n = 31), secondary (n = 31) or iatrogenic (n = 31) metatarsalgia, or were matched-paired healthy controls (n = 31). METHODS: Self-reported domain scores were obtained using the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) and were compared between the participants with metatarsalgia and between these and the healthy controls. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were shown in all FHSQ domains (P ≤ 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the metatarsalgia types in relation to the matched healthy control group, such that the participants with metatarsalgia presented impaired foot-specific and general health-related QoL (lower FHSQ scores). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that presence of metatarsalgia had a negative impact on foot health-related QoL. Foot-specific health and general health were poorer among patients with metatarsalgia, especially among those with secondary and iatrogenic metatarsalgia, in comparison with matched healthy controls.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500464
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802018000500464
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.0220190918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.136 n.5 2018
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209266218041344