Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (< 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wang,Dong
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cao,Lina, Li,Boya
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005027201
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis in low-dose (≤ 3 mSv) computed tomography (CT) is a potential screening tool for lung nodules, with quality interpretation and less inter-observer variability among readers. Therefore, we aimed to determine the screening potential of CT using a radiation dose that does not exceed 2 mSv. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT interpretation results using a computer-aided diagnosis system for lung cancer screening with those of a conventional reading system used by radiologists. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a comparative study of chest CT images for lung cancer screening at three private institutions. METHODS: A database of low-dose (< 2 mSv) chest CT images of patients at risk of lung cancer was viewed with the conventional reading system (301 patients and 226 nodules) or computer-aided diagnosis system without any subsequent radiologist review (944 patients and 1,048 nodules). RESULTS: The numbers of detected and solid nodules per patient (both P < 0.0001) were higher using the computer-aided diagnosis system than those using the conventional reading system. The nodule size was reported as the maximum size in any plane in the computer-aided diagnosis system. Higher numbers of patients (102 [11%] versus 20 [7%], P = 0.0345) and nodules (154 [15%] versus 17 [8%], P = 0.0035) were diagnosed with cancer using the computer-aided diagnosis system. CONCLUSIONS: The computer-aided diagnosis system facilitates the diagnosis of cancerous nodules, especially solid nodules, in low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT among patients at risk for lung cancer.
id APM-1_849b6cf12e653592664a3e112cb4778f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802022005027201
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancerDiagnostic imagingEarly detection of cancerLung neoplasmsCancer noduleComputed tomographyComputer-aided detection systemImage planeLung cancerRadiation doseABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis in low-dose (≤ 3 mSv) computed tomography (CT) is a potential screening tool for lung nodules, with quality interpretation and less inter-observer variability among readers. Therefore, we aimed to determine the screening potential of CT using a radiation dose that does not exceed 2 mSv. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT interpretation results using a computer-aided diagnosis system for lung cancer screening with those of a conventional reading system used by radiologists. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a comparative study of chest CT images for lung cancer screening at three private institutions. METHODS: A database of low-dose (< 2 mSv) chest CT images of patients at risk of lung cancer was viewed with the conventional reading system (301 patients and 226 nodules) or computer-aided diagnosis system without any subsequent radiologist review (944 patients and 1,048 nodules). RESULTS: The numbers of detected and solid nodules per patient (both P < 0.0001) were higher using the computer-aided diagnosis system than those using the conventional reading system. The nodule size was reported as the maximum size in any plane in the computer-aided diagnosis system. Higher numbers of patients (102 [11%] versus 20 [7%], P = 0.0345) and nodules (154 [15%] versus 17 [8%], P = 0.0035) were diagnosed with cancer using the computer-aided diagnosis system. CONCLUSIONS: The computer-aided diagnosis system facilitates the diagnosis of cancerous nodules, especially solid nodules, in low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT among patients at risk for lung cancer.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005027201Sao Paulo Medical Journal n.ahead 2022reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0130.r1.29042022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWang,DongCao,LinaLi,Boyaeng2022-10-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802022005027201Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2022-10-25T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
title Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
spellingShingle Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
Wang,Dong
Diagnostic imaging
Early detection of cancer
Lung neoplasms
Cancer nodule
Computed tomography
Computer-aided detection system
Image plane
Lung cancer
Radiation dose
title_short Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
title_full Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
title_fullStr Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
title_sort Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (&lt; 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer
author Wang,Dong
author_facet Wang,Dong
Cao,Lina
Li,Boya
author_role author
author2 Cao,Lina
Li,Boya
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wang,Dong
Cao,Lina
Li,Boya
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diagnostic imaging
Early detection of cancer
Lung neoplasms
Cancer nodule
Computed tomography
Computer-aided detection system
Image plane
Lung cancer
Radiation dose
topic Diagnostic imaging
Early detection of cancer
Lung neoplasms
Cancer nodule
Computed tomography
Computer-aided detection system
Image plane
Lung cancer
Radiation dose
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis in low-dose (≤ 3 mSv) computed tomography (CT) is a potential screening tool for lung nodules, with quality interpretation and less inter-observer variability among readers. Therefore, we aimed to determine the screening potential of CT using a radiation dose that does not exceed 2 mSv. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the diagnostic parameters of low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT interpretation results using a computer-aided diagnosis system for lung cancer screening with those of a conventional reading system used by radiologists. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a comparative study of chest CT images for lung cancer screening at three private institutions. METHODS: A database of low-dose (< 2 mSv) chest CT images of patients at risk of lung cancer was viewed with the conventional reading system (301 patients and 226 nodules) or computer-aided diagnosis system without any subsequent radiologist review (944 patients and 1,048 nodules). RESULTS: The numbers of detected and solid nodules per patient (both P < 0.0001) were higher using the computer-aided diagnosis system than those using the conventional reading system. The nodule size was reported as the maximum size in any plane in the computer-aided diagnosis system. Higher numbers of patients (102 [11%] versus 20 [7%], P = 0.0345) and nodules (154 [15%] versus 17 [8%], P = 0.0035) were diagnosed with cancer using the computer-aided diagnosis system. CONCLUSIONS: The computer-aided diagnosis system facilitates the diagnosis of cancerous nodules, especially solid nodules, in low-dose (< 2 mSv) CT among patients at risk for lung cancer.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005027201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802022005027201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0130.r1.29042022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal n.ahead 2022
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209269091139584