Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Cecatti,José Guilherme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802003000300003
Resumo: CONTEXT: Misoprostol, a synthetic E1 methyl analog prostaglandin, is at present receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labor induction agent. However, there is still a need for better determination of its safety and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To compare intravaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was performed at the Leonor Mendes de Barros Maternity Hospital between November 1998 and December 2000. PARTICIPANTS: 210 pregnant women with intact membranes and indication for labor induction were selected. PROCEDURES: The women randomly received 25 µg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours, not exceeding 8 doses (105 women), or oxytocin in a continuous infusion (105 women). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main parameters measured were: latent period, time from induction to vaginal delivery, delivery route, occurrence of vaginal delivery with time, occurrence of uterine tonus alterations, hypoxia and neonatal morbidity. To verify the statistical significance of the differences between the groups, the chi-squared, Student t and log-rank tests were used. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups concerning conditions for labor induction, age, parity, race, marital status, family income, initial Bishop Index and number of prenatal visits. The cesarean section rate, latent period and period from induction to vaginal delivery were significantly lower for the misoprostol group. With regard to uterine tonus alterations, tachysystole was significantly more common in the misoprostol group. However, there was no difference in hypoxia and neonatal morbidity between the groups. CONCLUSION: 25 µg of misoprostol used vaginally every 4 hours is safer and more efficient for cervical ripening and labor induction than oxytocin.
id APM-1_cf641b5f14aa385b72dd4784c183054e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-31802003000300003
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trialMisoprostolOxytocinProstaglandinsLabor inductionRandomized controlled trialCONTEXT: Misoprostol, a synthetic E1 methyl analog prostaglandin, is at present receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labor induction agent. However, there is still a need for better determination of its safety and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To compare intravaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was performed at the Leonor Mendes de Barros Maternity Hospital between November 1998 and December 2000. PARTICIPANTS: 210 pregnant women with intact membranes and indication for labor induction were selected. PROCEDURES: The women randomly received 25 µg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours, not exceeding 8 doses (105 women), or oxytocin in a continuous infusion (105 women). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main parameters measured were: latent period, time from induction to vaginal delivery, delivery route, occurrence of vaginal delivery with time, occurrence of uterine tonus alterations, hypoxia and neonatal morbidity. To verify the statistical significance of the differences between the groups, the chi-squared, Student t and log-rank tests were used. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups concerning conditions for labor induction, age, parity, race, marital status, family income, initial Bishop Index and number of prenatal visits. The cesarean section rate, latent period and period from induction to vaginal delivery were significantly lower for the misoprostol group. With regard to uterine tonus alterations, tachysystole was significantly more common in the misoprostol group. However, there was no difference in hypoxia and neonatal morbidity between the groups. CONCLUSION: 25 µg of misoprostol used vaginally every 4 hours is safer and more efficient for cervical ripening and labor induction than oxytocin.Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802003000300003Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.121 n.3 2003reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APM10.1590/S1516-31802003000300003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora deCecatti,José Guilhermeeng2003-08-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-31802003000300003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2003-08-08T00:00São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
title Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
Aquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
Misoprostol
Oxytocin
Prostaglandins
Labor induction
Randomized controlled trial
title_short Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
title_full Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
title_sort Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial
author Aquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
author_facet Aquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
Cecatti,José Guilherme
author_role author
author2 Cecatti,José Guilherme
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aquino,Márcia Maria Auxiliadora de
Cecatti,José Guilherme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Misoprostol
Oxytocin
Prostaglandins
Labor induction
Randomized controlled trial
topic Misoprostol
Oxytocin
Prostaglandins
Labor induction
Randomized controlled trial
description CONTEXT: Misoprostol, a synthetic E1 methyl analog prostaglandin, is at present receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labor induction agent. However, there is still a need for better determination of its safety and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To compare intravaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was performed at the Leonor Mendes de Barros Maternity Hospital between November 1998 and December 2000. PARTICIPANTS: 210 pregnant women with intact membranes and indication for labor induction were selected. PROCEDURES: The women randomly received 25 µg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours, not exceeding 8 doses (105 women), or oxytocin in a continuous infusion (105 women). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The main parameters measured were: latent period, time from induction to vaginal delivery, delivery route, occurrence of vaginal delivery with time, occurrence of uterine tonus alterations, hypoxia and neonatal morbidity. To verify the statistical significance of the differences between the groups, the chi-squared, Student t and log-rank tests were used. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups concerning conditions for labor induction, age, parity, race, marital status, family income, initial Bishop Index and number of prenatal visits. The cesarean section rate, latent period and period from induction to vaginal delivery were significantly lower for the misoprostol group. With regard to uterine tonus alterations, tachysystole was significantly more common in the misoprostol group. However, there was no difference in hypoxia and neonatal morbidity between the groups. CONCLUSION: 25 µg of misoprostol used vaginally every 4 hours is safer and more efficient for cervical ripening and labor induction than oxytocin.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802003000300003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802003000300003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-31802003000300003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sao Paulo Medical Journal v.121 n.3 2003
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1754209260520079360