Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Lorenzo,Laura, Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux, Montenegro,Maria Cristina, Cantilino,Amaury
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed.
id APRGS-1_9be17db39e15b41b6b0cfbff2eb16d2f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-60892017000100054
network_acronym_str APRGS-1
network_name_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository_id_str
spelling Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?Postpartum depressionperinatal depressionpostnatal depressionscreeningdiagnosisAbstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.39 n.1 2017reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0034info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes,Gustavo Paranhos de AlbuquerqueLorenzo,LauraPontes,Gabriela Arruda ReinauxMontenegro,Maria CristinaCantilino,Amauryeng2017-04-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892017000100054Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2017-04-06T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
title Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
spellingShingle Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque
Postpartum depression
perinatal depression
postnatal depression
screening
diagnosis
title_short Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
title_full Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
title_fullStr Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
title_full_unstemmed Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
title_sort Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
author Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque
author_facet Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque
Lorenzo,Laura
Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux
Montenegro,Maria Cristina
Cantilino,Amaury
author_role author
author2 Lorenzo,Laura
Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux
Montenegro,Maria Cristina
Cantilino,Amaury
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque
Lorenzo,Laura
Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux
Montenegro,Maria Cristina
Cantilino,Amaury
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Postpartum depression
perinatal depression
postnatal depression
screening
diagnosis
topic Postpartum depression
perinatal depression
postnatal depression
screening
diagnosis
description Abstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0034
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.39 n.1 2017
reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:APRGS
instname_str Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str APRGS
institution APRGS
reponame_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
collection Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754209280654835712