Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed. |
id |
APRGS-1_9be17db39e15b41b6b0cfbff2eb16d2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2237-60892017000100054 |
network_acronym_str |
APRGS-1 |
network_name_str |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how?Postpartum depressionperinatal depressionpostnatal depressionscreeningdiagnosisAbstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.39 n.1 2017reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0034info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes,Gustavo Paranhos de AlbuquerqueLorenzo,LauraPontes,Gabriela Arruda ReinauxMontenegro,Maria CristinaCantilino,Amauryeng2017-04-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892017000100054Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2017-04-06T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
title |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
spellingShingle |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque Postpartum depression perinatal depression postnatal depression screening diagnosis |
title_short |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
title_full |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
title_fullStr |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
title_sort |
Screening and diagnosing postpartum depression: when and how? |
author |
Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque |
author_facet |
Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque Lorenzo,Laura Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux Montenegro,Maria Cristina Cantilino,Amaury |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lorenzo,Laura Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux Montenegro,Maria Cristina Cantilino,Amaury |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes,Gustavo Paranhos de Albuquerque Lorenzo,Laura Pontes,Gabriela Arruda Reinaux Montenegro,Maria Cristina Cantilino,Amaury |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Postpartum depression perinatal depression postnatal depression screening diagnosis |
topic |
Postpartum depression perinatal depression postnatal depression screening diagnosis |
description |
Abstract Introduction: Prevalence rates of postpartum depression (PPD) vary widely, depending on the methodological parameters used in studies: differences in study populations, diagnostic methods, and postpartum time frame. There is also no consensus on the ideal time to perform screening, on whether PPD can only be diagnosed in the early postnatal period, or on how soon after a delivery depression may be related to it. Objective: To review which instruments have been used over recent years to screen and diagnose PPD and the prevailing periods of diagnosis. Methods: Only articles published within 5 years and related exclusively to screening and diagnosis were selected. The sample comprised 22 articles. Results: The Edinburgh Posnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most common screening tool, used in 68% of the sample (15 articles), followed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (27%, 6 articles), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (18%, 4 articles). Screening time frame was reported in 21/22 articles: 0 to 3 months postpartum in 9 (43%), up to 6 months in 4 (19%), and up to 12 months or more in 8 (38%). In short, 13 articles screened during the first 6 months (59%) while only 8 (36%) screened up to 1 year. Conclusion: The most frequent PPD diagnosis tool was the EPDS, but other scales were also used. The most common period for diagnosis was up to 3 months postpartum. However, some researchers diagnosed PPD 12 months or more postpartum. Greater standardization of parameters for investigation of this disease is needed. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892017000100054 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0034 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.39 n.1 2017 reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:APRGS |
instname_str |
Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
APRGS |
institution |
APRGS |
reponame_str |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
collection |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754209280654835712 |