Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Levandovski,Rosa
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Sasso,Etianne, Hidalgo,Maria Paz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892013000100002
Resumo: The study of circadian typology differences has increased in the last few years. As a result, new instruments have been developed to estimate the individual circadian phase of temporal human behavior, also referred as chronotype. The current review was conducted to evaluate the differences among the questionnaires most frequently used to assess chronotype: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). Each instrument evaluates a different aspect of chronotype. MEQ is considered to evaluate the phase preferences of individual behavior over a 24-hour day, while MCTQ measures the phase of sleep positions for both free and work days. CSM is similar to MEQ, but is more sensitive to measure shift work. The concept of chronotype has been used to refer to phase positions or phase preferences in the literature reviewed. Most of the time this is a consequence of different interpretations: it is not clear whether phase preferences are a direct manifestation of the individual’s internal clock or a result of external cues, e.g., social interaction (including the alarm clock). Also, phase preferences are not uniform throughout life. Therefore, a single assessment, not taking age into consideration, will not accurately describe the sample. We suggest that MCTQ is the best instrument for investigators dealing with desynchronization and as an instrument for sleep phase. Conversely, if the goal is to assess characteristics that change under specific situations - chronotype -, the MEQ should be used.
id APRGS-1_d4525855929a1e57a789b1af9674e28f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-60892013000100002
network_acronym_str APRGS-1
network_name_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository_id_str
spelling Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotypeChronobiology phenomenacircadian rhythmmorningnesseveningnessreviewThe study of circadian typology differences has increased in the last few years. As a result, new instruments have been developed to estimate the individual circadian phase of temporal human behavior, also referred as chronotype. The current review was conducted to evaluate the differences among the questionnaires most frequently used to assess chronotype: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). Each instrument evaluates a different aspect of chronotype. MEQ is considered to evaluate the phase preferences of individual behavior over a 24-hour day, while MCTQ measures the phase of sleep positions for both free and work days. CSM is similar to MEQ, but is more sensitive to measure shift work. The concept of chronotype has been used to refer to phase positions or phase preferences in the literature reviewed. Most of the time this is a consequence of different interpretations: it is not clear whether phase preferences are a direct manifestation of the individual’s internal clock or a result of external cues, e.g., social interaction (including the alarm clock). Also, phase preferences are not uniform throughout life. Therefore, a single assessment, not taking age into consideration, will not accurately describe the sample. We suggest that MCTQ is the best instrument for investigators dealing with desynchronization and as an instrument for sleep phase. Conversely, if the goal is to assess characteristics that change under specific situations - chronotype -, the MEQ should be used.Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892013000100002Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.35 n.1 2013reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapyinstname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:APRGS10.1590/S2237-60892013000100002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLevandovski,RosaSasso,EtianneHidalgo,Maria Pazeng2015-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-60892013000100002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-6089&lng=en&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br2238-00192237-6089opendoar:2015-07-02T00:00Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
title Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
spellingShingle Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
Levandovski,Rosa
Chronobiology phenomena
circadian rhythm
morningness
eveningness
review
title_short Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
title_full Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
title_fullStr Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
title_full_unstemmed Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
title_sort Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype
author Levandovski,Rosa
author_facet Levandovski,Rosa
Sasso,Etianne
Hidalgo,Maria Paz
author_role author
author2 Sasso,Etianne
Hidalgo,Maria Paz
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Levandovski,Rosa
Sasso,Etianne
Hidalgo,Maria Paz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronobiology phenomena
circadian rhythm
morningness
eveningness
review
topic Chronobiology phenomena
circadian rhythm
morningness
eveningness
review
description The study of circadian typology differences has increased in the last few years. As a result, new instruments have been developed to estimate the individual circadian phase of temporal human behavior, also referred as chronotype. The current review was conducted to evaluate the differences among the questionnaires most frequently used to assess chronotype: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). Each instrument evaluates a different aspect of chronotype. MEQ is considered to evaluate the phase preferences of individual behavior over a 24-hour day, while MCTQ measures the phase of sleep positions for both free and work days. CSM is similar to MEQ, but is more sensitive to measure shift work. The concept of chronotype has been used to refer to phase positions or phase preferences in the literature reviewed. Most of the time this is a consequence of different interpretations: it is not clear whether phase preferences are a direct manifestation of the individual’s internal clock or a result of external cues, e.g., social interaction (including the alarm clock). Also, phase preferences are not uniform throughout life. Therefore, a single assessment, not taking age into consideration, will not accurately describe the sample. We suggest that MCTQ is the best instrument for investigators dealing with desynchronization and as an instrument for sleep phase. Conversely, if the goal is to assess characteristics that change under specific situations - chronotype -, the MEQ should be used.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892013000100002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-60892013000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2237-60892013000100002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy v.35 n.1 2013
reponame:Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
instname:Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:APRGS
instname_str Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str APRGS
institution APRGS
reponame_str Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
collection Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy - Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aprs.org.br|| rodrigo_grassi@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754209280145227776