Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Escobar, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Franzosi, Oellen Stuani, Coelho, Nathália, Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann, Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz, Ornell, Felipe, Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria, da Rocha, Neusa Sica
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Rasbran
Texto Completo: https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way.
id ASBRAN_8645fa299f6352c137f62c3c19c2add2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1343
network_acronym_str ASBRAN
network_name_str Rasbran
repository_id_str
spelling Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic ReviewObjective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way.Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi revisar sistematicamente as metodologias utilizadas para  avaliação/identificação da compulsão alimentar em ensaios clínicos com pacientes adultos. Métodos: A busca foi realizada no PUBMED até julho de 2018. Foi utilizado o protocolo PRISMA para reportar os resultados. Resultados: Foram incluídos 93 ensaios clínicos dentre os 225 que foram encontrados na busca da literatura. Os principais métodos de avaliação / identificação da compulsão alimentar utilizados nos estudos foram: Binge Eating Scale; Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais; Escala de Diagnóstico de Transtorno Alimentar; Exame de Transtorno Alimentar; Questionário de Exame de Transtorno Alimentar; Inventário de Desordens Alimentares; Escala de Perda de Controle sobre a Alimentação e Questionário de Alimentação de Três Fatores. Foram observadas sobreposições entre os métodos nos estudos, 61 utilizaram o DSM e outro instrumento de avaliação, seis estudos utilizaram apenas o DSM e 26 apenas questionários padronizados para avaliar o transtorno de compulsão alimentar. Conclusão: O critério diagnóstico do DSM-5 para o transtorno de compulsão alimentar é considerado excelente e utilizado amplamente, entretanto, quando o objetivo do estudo é identificar questões emocionais, nutricionais e qualitativas, pode ser utilizado de forma complementar um questionário ou entrevista sobre percepções subjetivas.ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN)2021-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/134310.47320/rasbran.2021.1343Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN; v. 12 n. 1 (2021); 242-2592357-78941983-3164reponame:Rasbraninstname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)instacron:ASBRANporhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343/364Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRANinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscobar, MarianaFranzosi, Oellen StuaniCoelho, NatháliaHalpern, Silvia ChwartzmannScherer, Juliana NichterwitzOrnell, FelipeMendes Cereser, Keila Mariada Rocha, Neusa Sica2021-11-24T16:59:17Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1343Revistahttps://www.rasbran.com.br/rasbranONGhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/oaiindex_rasbran@asbran.org.br || rasbran@asbran.org.br2357-78941983-3164opendoar:2021-11-24T16:59:17Rasbran - Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
title Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
spellingShingle Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
Escobar, Mariana
title_short Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
title_full Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
title_sort Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
author Escobar, Mariana
author_facet Escobar, Mariana
Franzosi, Oellen Stuani
Coelho, Nathália
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Ornell, Felipe
Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria
da Rocha, Neusa Sica
author_role author
author2 Franzosi, Oellen Stuani
Coelho, Nathália
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Ornell, Felipe
Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria
da Rocha, Neusa Sica
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Escobar, Mariana
Franzosi, Oellen Stuani
Coelho, Nathália
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Ornell, Felipe
Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria
da Rocha, Neusa Sica
description Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343
10.47320/rasbran.2021.1343
url https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343
identifier_str_mv 10.47320/rasbran.2021.1343
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343/364
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN; v. 12 n. 1 (2021); 242-259
2357-7894
1983-3164
reponame:Rasbran
instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)
instacron:ASBRAN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)
instacron_str ASBRAN
institution ASBRAN
reponame_str Rasbran
collection Rasbran
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rasbran - Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv index_rasbran@asbran.org.br || rasbran@asbran.org.br
_version_ 1797049027672408064