Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Rasbran |
Texto Completo: | https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way. |
id |
ASBRAN_8645fa299f6352c137f62c3c19c2add2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1343 |
network_acronym_str |
ASBRAN |
network_name_str |
Rasbran |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic ReviewObjective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way.Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi revisar sistematicamente as metodologias utilizadas para avaliação/identificação da compulsão alimentar em ensaios clínicos com pacientes adultos. Métodos: A busca foi realizada no PUBMED até julho de 2018. Foi utilizado o protocolo PRISMA para reportar os resultados. Resultados: Foram incluídos 93 ensaios clínicos dentre os 225 que foram encontrados na busca da literatura. Os principais métodos de avaliação / identificação da compulsão alimentar utilizados nos estudos foram: Binge Eating Scale; Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais; Escala de Diagnóstico de Transtorno Alimentar; Exame de Transtorno Alimentar; Questionário de Exame de Transtorno Alimentar; Inventário de Desordens Alimentares; Escala de Perda de Controle sobre a Alimentação e Questionário de Alimentação de Três Fatores. Foram observadas sobreposições entre os métodos nos estudos, 61 utilizaram o DSM e outro instrumento de avaliação, seis estudos utilizaram apenas o DSM e 26 apenas questionários padronizados para avaliar o transtorno de compulsão alimentar. Conclusão: O critério diagnóstico do DSM-5 para o transtorno de compulsão alimentar é considerado excelente e utilizado amplamente, entretanto, quando o objetivo do estudo é identificar questões emocionais, nutricionais e qualitativas, pode ser utilizado de forma complementar um questionário ou entrevista sobre percepções subjetivas.ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN)2021-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/134310.47320/rasbran.2021.1343Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN; v. 12 n. 1 (2021); 242-2592357-78941983-3164reponame:Rasbraninstname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)instacron:ASBRANporhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343/364Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRANinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEscobar, MarianaFranzosi, Oellen StuaniCoelho, NatháliaHalpern, Silvia ChwartzmannScherer, Juliana NichterwitzOrnell, FelipeMendes Cereser, Keila Mariada Rocha, Neusa Sica2021-11-24T16:59:17Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1343Revistahttps://www.rasbran.com.br/rasbranONGhttps://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/oaiindex_rasbran@asbran.org.br || rasbran@asbran.org.br2357-78941983-3164opendoar:2021-11-24T16:59:17Rasbran - Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
title |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
spellingShingle |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review Escobar, Mariana |
title_short |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
Instruments and Diagnostic Criteria for Binge Eating Assessment in Adults: A Systematic Review |
author |
Escobar, Mariana |
author_facet |
Escobar, Mariana Franzosi, Oellen Stuani Coelho, Nathália Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz Ornell, Felipe Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria da Rocha, Neusa Sica |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franzosi, Oellen Stuani Coelho, Nathália Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz Ornell, Felipe Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria da Rocha, Neusa Sica |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Escobar, Mariana Franzosi, Oellen Stuani Coelho, Nathália Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz Ornell, Felipe Mendes Cereser, Keila Maria da Rocha, Neusa Sica |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the methodologies used for BE evaluation/identification diagnosis in clinical trials (CT) with adults. Methods: The search was performed on PUBMED until July 2018. The PRISMA statement was used to improve the reporting of results.Results: 93 CTs were included among the 225 studies retrieved. The main BE evaluation/identification methods used in studies were: Binge Eating Scale; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale; Eating Disorder Examination; Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; Eating Disorder Inventory; Loss of Control Over Eating Scale and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Overlaps between methods were observed in studies, 61 used both DSM and an evaluation instrument, 06 only DSM and 26 only standardized questionnaires to assess BE disorder. Conclusions: The DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for binge eating disorder is considered excellent and widely used, however, when the objective of the study is to identify emotional, nutritional and qualitative issues, a questionnaire or interview about subjective perceptions can be used in a complementary way. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343 10.47320/rasbran.2021.1343 |
url |
https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47320/rasbran.2021.1343 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rasbran.com.br/rasbran/article/view/1343/364 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NUTRIÇÃO (ASBRAN) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Brasileira de Nutrição - RASBRAN; v. 12 n. 1 (2021); 242-259 2357-7894 1983-3164 reponame:Rasbran instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN) instacron:ASBRAN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN) |
instacron_str |
ASBRAN |
institution |
ASBRAN |
reponame_str |
Rasbran |
collection |
Rasbran |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rasbran - Associação Brasileira de Nutrição (ASBRAN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
index_rasbran@asbran.org.br || rasbran@asbran.org.br |
_version_ |
1797049027672408064 |