A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Qu,Xiao-Yu
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Hu,Ting-Ting, Zhou,Wei
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702015000200156
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy and safety of doripenem for bacterial infections. Methods: We included six randomized clinical trials identified from PubMed and Embase up to July 31, 2014. The included trials compared efficacy and safety of doripenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, nosocomial pneumonia, and acute biliary tract infection. The meta-analysis was carried on by the statistical software of Review Manager, version 5.2. Results: Compared with empirical antimicrobial agents on overall treatment efficacy, doripenem was associated with similar clinical and microbiological treatment success rates (for the clinical evaluable population, odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.69, p = 0.13; for clinical modified intent-to-treatment population, OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.55-1.41, p = 0.60; for microbiology evaluable population, OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.50, p = 0.26; for microbiological modified intent-to-treatment (m-mITT), OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, p = 0.87). We compared incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality to analyze treatment safety. The outcomes suggested that doripenem was similar to comparators in terms of incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality on modified intent-to-treatment population (for incidence of AEs, OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.35, p = 0.33; for all-cause mortality, OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.77-1.51, p = 0.67). In nosocomial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment, doripenem was not inferior to other antibacterial agents in terms of efficacy and safety. Conclusion: From this meta-analysis, we can conclude that doripenem is as valuable and well-tolerated than empirical antimicrobial agents for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, acute biliary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia treatment.
id BSID-1_a5ad2ce35f39bb88779c0a0e9d535324
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-86702015000200156
network_acronym_str BSID-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository_id_str
spelling A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infectionsDoripenem Meta-analysis EfficacySafetyInfection Objective: The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy and safety of doripenem for bacterial infections. Methods: We included six randomized clinical trials identified from PubMed and Embase up to July 31, 2014. The included trials compared efficacy and safety of doripenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, nosocomial pneumonia, and acute biliary tract infection. The meta-analysis was carried on by the statistical software of Review Manager, version 5.2. Results: Compared with empirical antimicrobial agents on overall treatment efficacy, doripenem was associated with similar clinical and microbiological treatment success rates (for the clinical evaluable population, odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.69, p = 0.13; for clinical modified intent-to-treatment population, OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.55-1.41, p = 0.60; for microbiology evaluable population, OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.50, p = 0.26; for microbiological modified intent-to-treatment (m-mITT), OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, p = 0.87). We compared incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality to analyze treatment safety. The outcomes suggested that doripenem was similar to comparators in terms of incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality on modified intent-to-treatment population (for incidence of AEs, OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.35, p = 0.33; for all-cause mortality, OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.77-1.51, p = 0.67). In nosocomial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment, doripenem was not inferior to other antibacterial agents in terms of efficacy and safety. Conclusion: From this meta-analysis, we can conclude that doripenem is as valuable and well-tolerated than empirical antimicrobial agents for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, acute biliary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia treatment.Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702015000200156Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.19 n.2 2015reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinstname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)instacron:BSID10.1016/j.bjid.2014.10.010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQu,Xiao-YuHu,Ting-TingZhou,Weieng2016-01-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-86702015000200156Revistahttps://www.bjid.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br1678-43911413-8670opendoar:2016-01-27T00:00Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
title A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
spellingShingle A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
Qu,Xiao-Yu
Doripenem Meta-analysis Efficacy
Safety
Infection
title_short A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
title_full A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
title_sort A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
author Qu,Xiao-Yu
author_facet Qu,Xiao-Yu
Hu,Ting-Ting
Zhou,Wei
author_role author
author2 Hu,Ting-Ting
Zhou,Wei
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Qu,Xiao-Yu
Hu,Ting-Ting
Zhou,Wei
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doripenem Meta-analysis Efficacy
Safety
Infection
topic Doripenem Meta-analysis Efficacy
Safety
Infection
description Objective: The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy and safety of doripenem for bacterial infections. Methods: We included six randomized clinical trials identified from PubMed and Embase up to July 31, 2014. The included trials compared efficacy and safety of doripenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, nosocomial pneumonia, and acute biliary tract infection. The meta-analysis was carried on by the statistical software of Review Manager, version 5.2. Results: Compared with empirical antimicrobial agents on overall treatment efficacy, doripenem was associated with similar clinical and microbiological treatment success rates (for the clinical evaluable population, odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.69, p = 0.13; for clinical modified intent-to-treatment population, OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.55-1.41, p = 0.60; for microbiology evaluable population, OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.50, p = 0.26; for microbiological modified intent-to-treatment (m-mITT), OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, p = 0.87). We compared incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality to analyze treatment safety. The outcomes suggested that doripenem was similar to comparators in terms of incidence of adverse events and all-cause mortality on modified intent-to-treatment population (for incidence of AEs, OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.35, p = 0.33; for all-cause mortality, OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.77-1.51, p = 0.67). In nosocomial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment, doripenem was not inferior to other antibacterial agents in terms of efficacy and safety. Conclusion: From this meta-analysis, we can conclude that doripenem is as valuable and well-tolerated than empirical antimicrobial agents for complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infection, acute biliary tract infection and nosocomial pneumonia treatment.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702015000200156
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702015000200156
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.10.010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases v.19 n.2 2015
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
instname:Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron:BSID
instname_str Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
instacron_str BSID
institution BSID
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
collection Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (BSID)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjid@bjid.org.br||lgoldani@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1754209243284635648