Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: ROXO,ANA CLAUDIA WECK, NAHAS,FABIO XERFAN, SERRA-GUIMARÃES,FERNANDO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000100158
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.
id CBC-1_35664c98fef4701d4b1f96e0574d714f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912018000100158
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfactionMammaplastyPatient SatisfactionPlastic SurgeryBreast ImplantsSize PerceptionABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000100158Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.45 n.1 2018reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20181345info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZAROXO,ANA CLAUDIA WECKNAHAS,FABIO XERFANSERRA-GUIMARÃES,FERNANDOeng2018-02-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912018000100158Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2018-02-15T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
title Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
spellingShingle Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
MOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
Mammaplasty
Patient Satisfaction
Plastic Surgery
Breast Implants
Size Perception
title_short Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
title_full Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
title_fullStr Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
title_sort Comparison between different methods of breast implant volume choice and degree of postoperative satisfaction
author MOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
author_facet MOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
ROXO,ANA CLAUDIA WECK
NAHAS,FABIO XERFAN
SERRA-GUIMARÃES,FERNANDO
author_role author
author2 ROXO,ANA CLAUDIA WECK
NAHAS,FABIO XERFAN
SERRA-GUIMARÃES,FERNANDO
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MOTTA,RAFAEL DAIBERT DE SOUZA
ROXO,ANA CLAUDIA WECK
NAHAS,FABIO XERFAN
SERRA-GUIMARÃES,FERNANDO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mammaplasty
Patient Satisfaction
Plastic Surgery
Breast Implants
Size Perception
topic Mammaplasty
Patient Satisfaction
Plastic Surgery
Breast Implants
Size Perception
description ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the degree of patient satisfaction after undergoing breast augmentation and compare three different, easy, inexpensive and universal methods of preoperative choice of breast implant volume. Methods: a prospective study was carried out at University Hospital Pedro Ernesto of State University of Rio de Janeiro, in 94 women from Rio de Janeiro, aged 18 to 49 years, submitted to breast augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant due to hypomastia. All implants were textured, with a round base and high projection and were introduced into the retroglandular space through an inframammary access. The patients were divided into three groups: Control, Silicone and MamaSize®, with 44, 25 and 25 patients, respectively. Satisfaction questionnaires were applied in the pre and postoperative periods by the same evaluator, through the visual analogue scale, in which ‘0’ meant very unsatisfied and ‘100’ very satisfied for the four variables: shape, size, symmetry and consistency. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was also assessed in the postoperative period. Results: when the preoperative and postoperative satisfaction levels were compared, there was a difference in all variables for the three groups, with statistical significance. However, when the postoperative data were compared with each other, there was no significant difference. The degree of satisfaction with the surgical scar was high. Conclusion: the augmentation mammaplasty with breast implant had a high index of satisfaction among patients. However, there was no difference in the degree of satisfaction in the postoperative period between the three methodologies of breast volume measurement.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000100158
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912018000100158
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181345
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.45 n.1 2018
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209214091231232