New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100219 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (<6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (> 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation. |
id |
CBC-1_4605ea9781e55ba5367f545f693fc542 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100219 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancerBreast Neoplasms. Conservative Treatment. MastectomySegmental. Body Image. ROC AnalysisABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (<6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (> 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100219Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202698info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVIEIRA,RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTABILLER,GABRIELESILVA,FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DASILVA,JONATHAS JOSÉ DAOLIVEIRA,MARCO ANTÔNIO DEBAILÃO-JUNIOR,ANTÔNIOeng2021-06-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100219Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2021-06-10T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
title |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
spellingShingle |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer VIEIRA,RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA Breast Neoplasms. Conservative Treatment. Mastectomy Segmental. Body Image. ROC Analysis |
title_short |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
title_full |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
title_fullStr |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
title_sort |
New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer |
author |
VIEIRA,RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA |
author_facet |
VIEIRA,RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA BILLER,GABRIELE SILVA,FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA SILVA,JONATHAS JOSÉ DA OLIVEIRA,MARCO ANTÔNIO DE BAILÃO-JUNIOR,ANTÔNIO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BILLER,GABRIELE SILVA,FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA SILVA,JONATHAS JOSÉ DA OLIVEIRA,MARCO ANTÔNIO DE BAILÃO-JUNIOR,ANTÔNIO |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
VIEIRA,RENÉ ALOISIO DA COSTA BILLER,GABRIELE SILVA,FABIOLA CRISTINA BRANDINI DA SILVA,JONATHAS JOSÉ DA OLIVEIRA,MARCO ANTÔNIO DE BAILÃO-JUNIOR,ANTÔNIO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast Neoplasms. Conservative Treatment. Mastectomy Segmental. Body Image. ROC Analysis |
topic |
Breast Neoplasms. Conservative Treatment. Mastectomy Segmental. Body Image. ROC Analysis |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. Methods: a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. Results: a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (<6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (> 6.35). Conclusions: the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100219 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100219 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6991e-20202698 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209215083184128 |