Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241520 |
Resumo: | Background: The Geometric Compensation Technique (GCT) and the Split Reduction Technique (SRT) enables breast conserving surgery (BCS) in selected patients with breast cancer initially candidates to mastectomy. Methods: Observational study of patients with breast cancer who underwent GCT consecutively treated. Evaluated retrospectively: indications, clinical characteristics, surgical features and recurrences. Cosmesis were evaluated prospectively by the BCCT.core software, Harris/Harvard and Garbay scales. Descriptive statistics were performed, chi-square test was used to compare aesthetic outcomes; Kappa and Weighted Kappa test was used to assess agreement between the postoperative evaluations; Kaplan-Meier model for follow-up and recurrence. A systematic review was carried out using PRISMA methodology. Results: Thirty-six patients were evaluated, 26 (72.2%) with medium/large breasts with or without ptosis, seven (19.4%) with small breasts with or without ptosis, a profile undergoing GCT not previously identified in the literature. The mean tumor clinical size was 3.65 ± 1.59 cm. 34 (94.4%) patients underwent GCT. Mean follow-up time was 36.6 ± 16.8 months, with no local recurrences. According to BCCT.core, the postoperative aesthetic was good in 17 (51.5%) patients and 11 (33.3%) was reasonable. In the systematic review, 3.584 articles were evaluated, 20 articles were selected, 243 patients undergoing GCT were found, with several indications for BCS instead of mastectomy, with high rates of free margins, low recurrence and good aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion: GCT, an oncologically safe and aesthetically satisfactory option, has been extended to patients with small and medium breasts with ptosis, large tumors to breast volume or in unfavorable resection sites, initially candidates for mastectomy. |
id |
UNSP_0c67e1c1f97c030ec671d4faeabeba56 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241520 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literatureBreast neoplasmsConservative treatmentMammoplastyPlastic surgerySegmental mastectomyBackground: The Geometric Compensation Technique (GCT) and the Split Reduction Technique (SRT) enables breast conserving surgery (BCS) in selected patients with breast cancer initially candidates to mastectomy. Methods: Observational study of patients with breast cancer who underwent GCT consecutively treated. Evaluated retrospectively: indications, clinical characteristics, surgical features and recurrences. Cosmesis were evaluated prospectively by the BCCT.core software, Harris/Harvard and Garbay scales. Descriptive statistics were performed, chi-square test was used to compare aesthetic outcomes; Kappa and Weighted Kappa test was used to assess agreement between the postoperative evaluations; Kaplan-Meier model for follow-up and recurrence. A systematic review was carried out using PRISMA methodology. Results: Thirty-six patients were evaluated, 26 (72.2%) with medium/large breasts with or without ptosis, seven (19.4%) with small breasts with or without ptosis, a profile undergoing GCT not previously identified in the literature. The mean tumor clinical size was 3.65 ± 1.59 cm. 34 (94.4%) patients underwent GCT. Mean follow-up time was 36.6 ± 16.8 months, with no local recurrences. According to BCCT.core, the postoperative aesthetic was good in 17 (51.5%) patients and 11 (33.3%) was reasonable. In the systematic review, 3.584 articles were evaluated, 20 articles were selected, 243 patients undergoing GCT were found, with several indications for BCS instead of mastectomy, with high rates of free margins, low recurrence and good aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion: GCT, an oncologically safe and aesthetically satisfactory option, has been extended to patients with small and medium breasts with ptosis, large tumors to breast volume or in unfavorable resection sites, initially candidates for mastectomy.Postgraduate Program of Tocoginecology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University – UNESP, Av. Prof. Montenegro. Distrito de Botucatu, SPPostgraduate Program of Oncology Barretos Cancer Hospital, R. Antenor Duarte Viléla, 1331 - Dr. Paulo Prata, SPDepartment of Mastology and Breast Reconstruction Barretos Cancer Hospital, R. Antenor Duarte Viléla, 1331 - Dr. Paulo Prata, SPDepartament of Surgery Division of Mastology Muriaé Cancer Hospital, Av. Cristiano Ferreira Varella, 555 - Universitário, MGPostgraduate Program of Tocoginecology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University – UNESP, Av. Prof. Montenegro. Distrito de Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Barretos Cancer HospitalMuriaé Cancer HospitalFranca, Flávia Cardoso [UNESP]de Oliveira-Junior, Idam [UNESP]Morgan, Andréa MorenoHaikel, Raphael Luizda Costa Vieira, René Aloisio [UNESP]2023-03-01T21:07:46Z2023-03-01T21:07:46Z2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839Surgical Oncology, v. 44.1879-33200960-7404http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24152010.1016/j.suronc.2022.1018392-s2.0-85136178776Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSurgical Oncologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T14:07:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241520Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T14:07:32Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
title |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature Franca, Flávia Cardoso [UNESP] Breast neoplasms Conservative treatment Mammoplasty Plastic surgery Segmental mastectomy |
title_short |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
title_full |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
title_sort |
Breast-conserving surgery with the geometric compensation/split reduction technique. Indications, oncologic safety and cosmesis. A cohort series and systematic review of the literature |
author |
Franca, Flávia Cardoso [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Franca, Flávia Cardoso [UNESP] de Oliveira-Junior, Idam [UNESP] Morgan, Andréa Moreno Haikel, Raphael Luiz da Costa Vieira, René Aloisio [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Oliveira-Junior, Idam [UNESP] Morgan, Andréa Moreno Haikel, Raphael Luiz da Costa Vieira, René Aloisio [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Barretos Cancer Hospital Muriaé Cancer Hospital |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Franca, Flávia Cardoso [UNESP] de Oliveira-Junior, Idam [UNESP] Morgan, Andréa Moreno Haikel, Raphael Luiz da Costa Vieira, René Aloisio [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast neoplasms Conservative treatment Mammoplasty Plastic surgery Segmental mastectomy |
topic |
Breast neoplasms Conservative treatment Mammoplasty Plastic surgery Segmental mastectomy |
description |
Background: The Geometric Compensation Technique (GCT) and the Split Reduction Technique (SRT) enables breast conserving surgery (BCS) in selected patients with breast cancer initially candidates to mastectomy. Methods: Observational study of patients with breast cancer who underwent GCT consecutively treated. Evaluated retrospectively: indications, clinical characteristics, surgical features and recurrences. Cosmesis were evaluated prospectively by the BCCT.core software, Harris/Harvard and Garbay scales. Descriptive statistics were performed, chi-square test was used to compare aesthetic outcomes; Kappa and Weighted Kappa test was used to assess agreement between the postoperative evaluations; Kaplan-Meier model for follow-up and recurrence. A systematic review was carried out using PRISMA methodology. Results: Thirty-six patients were evaluated, 26 (72.2%) with medium/large breasts with or without ptosis, seven (19.4%) with small breasts with or without ptosis, a profile undergoing GCT not previously identified in the literature. The mean tumor clinical size was 3.65 ± 1.59 cm. 34 (94.4%) patients underwent GCT. Mean follow-up time was 36.6 ± 16.8 months, with no local recurrences. According to BCCT.core, the postoperative aesthetic was good in 17 (51.5%) patients and 11 (33.3%) was reasonable. In the systematic review, 3.584 articles were evaluated, 20 articles were selected, 243 patients undergoing GCT were found, with several indications for BCS instead of mastectomy, with high rates of free margins, low recurrence and good aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion: GCT, an oncologically safe and aesthetically satisfactory option, has been extended to patients with small and medium breasts with ptosis, large tumors to breast volume or in unfavorable resection sites, initially candidates for mastectomy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-01 2023-03-01T21:07:46Z 2023-03-01T21:07:46Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839 Surgical Oncology, v. 44. 1879-3320 0960-7404 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241520 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839 2-s2.0-85136178776 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241520 |
identifier_str_mv |
Surgical Oncology, v. 44. 1879-3320 0960-7404 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101839 2-s2.0-85136178776 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgical Oncology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128169599827968 |