Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLI
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: LIBÓRIO,PAULA RIBEIRO, SHIMODA,GIOVANNA MENNITTI, PIVETTA,LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO, PARREIRA,JOSÉ GUSTAVO, ASSEF,JOSE CESAR
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100208
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the relation between Trauma Quality Indicators (QI) and death, as well as clinical adverse events in severe trauma patients. Methods: analysis of data collected in the Trauma Register between 2014-2015, including patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16, reviewing the QI: (F1) Acute subdural hematoma drainage > 4 hours with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <9; (F2) emergency room transference without definitive airway and GCS <9; (F3) Re-intubation within 48 hours; (F4) Admission-laparotomy time greater than 60 min in hemodynamically instable patients with abdominal bleeding; (F5) Unprogrammed reoperation; (F6) Laparotomy after 4 hours; (F7) Unfixed femur diaphyseal fracture; (F8) Non-operative treatment for abdominal gunshot; (F9) Admission-tibial exposure fracture treatment time > 6 hours; (F10) Surgery > 24 hours. T the chi-squared and Fisher tests were used to calculate statistical relevance, considering p<0.05 as relevant. Results: 127 patients were included, whose ISS ranged from 17 to 75 (28.8 + 11.5). There were adverse events in 80 cases (63%) and 29 died (22.8%). Twenty-six patients had some QI compromised (20.6%). From the 101 patients with no QI, 22% died, and 7 of 26 patients with compromised QI (26.9%) (p=0.595). From the patients with no compromised QI, 62% presented some adverse event. From the patients with any compromised QI, 18 (65.4%) had some adverse event on clinical evolution (p=0.751). Conclusion: the QI should not be used as death or adverse events predictors in severe trauma patients.
id CBC-1_6fc4a1b706b5aa0836adc9ccc95d50c0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100208
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patientsTraumatologyMultiple TraumaTrauma Severity IndicesQuality of Health CareABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the relation between Trauma Quality Indicators (QI) and death, as well as clinical adverse events in severe trauma patients. Methods: analysis of data collected in the Trauma Register between 2014-2015, including patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16, reviewing the QI: (F1) Acute subdural hematoma drainage > 4 hours with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <9; (F2) emergency room transference without definitive airway and GCS <9; (F3) Re-intubation within 48 hours; (F4) Admission-laparotomy time greater than 60 min in hemodynamically instable patients with abdominal bleeding; (F5) Unprogrammed reoperation; (F6) Laparotomy after 4 hours; (F7) Unfixed femur diaphyseal fracture; (F8) Non-operative treatment for abdominal gunshot; (F9) Admission-tibial exposure fracture treatment time > 6 hours; (F10) Surgery > 24 hours. T the chi-squared and Fisher tests were used to calculate statistical relevance, considering p<0.05 as relevant. Results: 127 patients were included, whose ISS ranged from 17 to 75 (28.8 + 11.5). There were adverse events in 80 cases (63%) and 29 died (22.8%). Twenty-six patients had some QI compromised (20.6%). From the 101 patients with no QI, 22% died, and 7 of 26 patients with compromised QI (26.9%) (p=0.595). From the patients with no compromised QI, 62% presented some adverse event. From the patients with any compromised QI, 18 (65.4%) had some adverse event on clinical evolution (p=0.751). Conclusion: the QI should not be used as death or adverse events predictors in severe trauma patients.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100208Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202769info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLILIBÓRIO,PAULA RIBEIROSHIMODA,GIOVANNA MENNITTIPIVETTA,LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIOPARREIRA,JOSÉ GUSTAVOASSEF,JOSE CESAReng2021-02-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912021000100208Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2021-02-19T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
title Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
spellingShingle Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
ANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLI
Traumatology
Multiple Trauma
Trauma Severity Indices
Quality of Health Care
title_short Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
title_full Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
title_fullStr Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
title_full_unstemmed Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
title_sort Trauma Quality Indicators’ usage limitations in severe trauma patients
author ANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLI
author_facet ANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLI
LIBÓRIO,PAULA RIBEIRO
SHIMODA,GIOVANNA MENNITTI
PIVETTA,LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
PARREIRA,JOSÉ GUSTAVO
ASSEF,JOSE CESAR
author_role author
author2 LIBÓRIO,PAULA RIBEIRO
SHIMODA,GIOVANNA MENNITTI
PIVETTA,LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
PARREIRA,JOSÉ GUSTAVO
ASSEF,JOSE CESAR
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ANTUNES,PEDRO DE SOUZA LUCARELLI
LIBÓRIO,PAULA RIBEIRO
SHIMODA,GIOVANNA MENNITTI
PIVETTA,LUCA GIOVANNI ANTONIO
PARREIRA,JOSÉ GUSTAVO
ASSEF,JOSE CESAR
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Traumatology
Multiple Trauma
Trauma Severity Indices
Quality of Health Care
topic Traumatology
Multiple Trauma
Trauma Severity Indices
Quality of Health Care
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the relation between Trauma Quality Indicators (QI) and death, as well as clinical adverse events in severe trauma patients. Methods: analysis of data collected in the Trauma Register between 2014-2015, including patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16, reviewing the QI: (F1) Acute subdural hematoma drainage > 4 hours with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <9; (F2) emergency room transference without definitive airway and GCS <9; (F3) Re-intubation within 48 hours; (F4) Admission-laparotomy time greater than 60 min in hemodynamically instable patients with abdominal bleeding; (F5) Unprogrammed reoperation; (F6) Laparotomy after 4 hours; (F7) Unfixed femur diaphyseal fracture; (F8) Non-operative treatment for abdominal gunshot; (F9) Admission-tibial exposure fracture treatment time > 6 hours; (F10) Surgery > 24 hours. T the chi-squared and Fisher tests were used to calculate statistical relevance, considering p<0.05 as relevant. Results: 127 patients were included, whose ISS ranged from 17 to 75 (28.8 + 11.5). There were adverse events in 80 cases (63%) and 29 died (22.8%). Twenty-six patients had some QI compromised (20.6%). From the 101 patients with no QI, 22% died, and 7 of 26 patients with compromised QI (26.9%) (p=0.595). From the patients with no compromised QI, 62% presented some adverse event. From the patients with any compromised QI, 18 (65.4%) had some adverse event on clinical evolution (p=0.751). Conclusion: the QI should not be used as death or adverse events predictors in severe trauma patients.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100208
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912021000100208
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202769
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.48 2021
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209215064309760