HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antunes,Alberto Azoubel
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800017
Resumo: Objective: To conduct a critical analysis of the two main bibliometric indexes used by science: the impact factor and the H index. Method: Research was conducted on PubMed using the keywords: impact factor, Bibliometrics and H index. Results: The citations of articles tend to follow a curve in which the articles published in a given year increase sharply to a peak occurring between two and six years after its publication. From this peak citations decline over time. Conclusion: The analysis of the scientific merit should not be based on only in bibliometric measure, but in the association of various parameters. The impact factor and the H index is mainly based on the number of citations of scientific papers, and this parameter, although important, should not be used alone, nor overvalued in the evaluation of teaching merit.
id CBC-1_eb98ae9b0b015f7a7e099f687de61870
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800017
network_acronym_str CBC-1
network_name_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository_id_str
spelling HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIONImpact factorBibliometricsH index Objective: To conduct a critical analysis of the two main bibliometric indexes used by science: the impact factor and the H index. Method: Research was conducted on PubMed using the keywords: impact factor, Bibliometrics and H index. Results: The citations of articles tend to follow a curve in which the articles published in a given year increase sharply to a peak occurring between two and six years after its publication. From this peak citations decline over time. Conclusion: The analysis of the scientific merit should not be based on only in bibliometric measure, but in the association of various parameters. The impact factor and the H index is mainly based on the number of citations of scientific papers, and this parameter, although important, should not be used alone, nor overvalued in the evaluation of teaching merit.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800017Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-69912015S01006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntunes,Alberto Azoubeleng2016-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912015000800017Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2016-07-19T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
title HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
spellingShingle HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
Antunes,Alberto Azoubel
Impact factor
Bibliometrics
H index
title_short HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
title_full HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
title_fullStr HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
title_full_unstemmed HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
title_sort HOW TO EVALUATE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
author Antunes,Alberto Azoubel
author_facet Antunes,Alberto Azoubel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antunes,Alberto Azoubel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Impact factor
Bibliometrics
H index
topic Impact factor
Bibliometrics
H index
description Objective: To conduct a critical analysis of the two main bibliometric indexes used by science: the impact factor and the H index. Method: Research was conducted on PubMed using the keywords: impact factor, Bibliometrics and H index. Results: The citations of articles tend to follow a curve in which the articles published in a given year increase sharply to a peak occurring between two and six years after its publication. From this peak citations decline over time. Conclusion: The analysis of the scientific merit should not be based on only in bibliometric measure, but in the association of various parameters. The impact factor and the H index is mainly based on the number of citations of scientific papers, and this parameter, although important, should not be used alone, nor overvalued in the evaluation of teaching merit.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912015000800017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-69912015S01006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.42 suppl.1 2015
reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron:CBC
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
instacron_str CBC
institution CBC
reponame_str Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
collection Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacbc@cbc.org.br
_version_ 1754209213189455872

Registros relacionados