Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MENACHO,Aline Moraes
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: REIMANN,Adriano, HIRATA,Lie Mara, GANZERELLA,Caroline, IVANO,Flavio Heuta, SUGISAWA,Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000100009
Resumo: Background: Colonoscopy is the most frequent exam used to evaluate colonic mucosa, allowing the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. The appropriate bowel preparation is indispensable for the realization of colonoscopy. Therefore, it is necessary the use of laxative medications, preferentially by oral administration. Aim: To compare two medications used in bowel preparation in adult patients going to ambulatory colonoscopy and to analyze the patients' profile. Methods: A double-blind prospective study with 200 patients, randomized in two groups: one that received polyethilene glycol and another that received lactulose. The patients answered to questionnaires to data compilation, as tolerance, symptoms and complications related to preparation. Besides, it was also evaluated the prepare efficacy related to the presence of fecal residue. Results: Intestinal habit alterations and abdominal pain were the main reasons to realize the exams and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity. Ten percent of the ones who received lactulose didn't get to finish the preparation and 50% considered the taste "bad, but tolerable". The most common subjective symptom after the medication was nausea, especially after lactulose. During the exam, most of the patients who used lactulose had a "light discomfort" and the ones who used polyethilene glycol considered the discomfort as "tolerable". The quality of the preparation was good in 75%, undependable of the medication that was used. Conclusion : Polyethilene glycol was more tolerable when compared to lactulose, without difference on the quality of the preparation.
id CBCD-1_2e58bd8b6af5913fea5bbcb452dd8300
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202014000100009
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopyColonoscopyBowel preparationPolietilenoglicolLactulose Background: Colonoscopy is the most frequent exam used to evaluate colonic mucosa, allowing the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. The appropriate bowel preparation is indispensable for the realization of colonoscopy. Therefore, it is necessary the use of laxative medications, preferentially by oral administration. Aim: To compare two medications used in bowel preparation in adult patients going to ambulatory colonoscopy and to analyze the patients' profile. Methods: A double-blind prospective study with 200 patients, randomized in two groups: one that received polyethilene glycol and another that received lactulose. The patients answered to questionnaires to data compilation, as tolerance, symptoms and complications related to preparation. Besides, it was also evaluated the prepare efficacy related to the presence of fecal residue. Results: Intestinal habit alterations and abdominal pain were the main reasons to realize the exams and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity. Ten percent of the ones who received lactulose didn't get to finish the preparation and 50% considered the taste "bad, but tolerable". The most common subjective symptom after the medication was nausea, especially after lactulose. During the exam, most of the patients who used lactulose had a "light discomfort" and the ones who used polyethilene glycol considered the discomfort as "tolerable". The quality of the preparation was good in 75%, undependable of the medication that was used. Conclusion : Polyethilene glycol was more tolerable when compared to lactulose, without difference on the quality of the preparation.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2014-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000100009ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.27 n.1 2014reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/s0102-67202014000100003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMENACHO,Aline MoraesREIMANN,AdrianoHIRATA,Lie MaraGANZERELLA,CarolineIVANO,Flavio HeutaSUGISAWA,Ricardoeng2019-03-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202014000100009Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2019-03-26T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
title Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
spellingShingle Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
MENACHO,Aline Moraes
Colonoscopy
Bowel preparation
Polietilenoglicol
Lactulose
title_short Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
title_full Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
title_fullStr Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
title_sort Double-blind prospective randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol to lactulose for bowel preparation in colonoscopy
author MENACHO,Aline Moraes
author_facet MENACHO,Aline Moraes
REIMANN,Adriano
HIRATA,Lie Mara
GANZERELLA,Caroline
IVANO,Flavio Heuta
SUGISAWA,Ricardo
author_role author
author2 REIMANN,Adriano
HIRATA,Lie Mara
GANZERELLA,Caroline
IVANO,Flavio Heuta
SUGISAWA,Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MENACHO,Aline Moraes
REIMANN,Adriano
HIRATA,Lie Mara
GANZERELLA,Caroline
IVANO,Flavio Heuta
SUGISAWA,Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colonoscopy
Bowel preparation
Polietilenoglicol
Lactulose
topic Colonoscopy
Bowel preparation
Polietilenoglicol
Lactulose
description Background: Colonoscopy is the most frequent exam used to evaluate colonic mucosa, allowing the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. The appropriate bowel preparation is indispensable for the realization of colonoscopy. Therefore, it is necessary the use of laxative medications, preferentially by oral administration. Aim: To compare two medications used in bowel preparation in adult patients going to ambulatory colonoscopy and to analyze the patients' profile. Methods: A double-blind prospective study with 200 patients, randomized in two groups: one that received polyethilene glycol and another that received lactulose. The patients answered to questionnaires to data compilation, as tolerance, symptoms and complications related to preparation. Besides, it was also evaluated the prepare efficacy related to the presence of fecal residue. Results: Intestinal habit alterations and abdominal pain were the main reasons to realize the exams and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity. Ten percent of the ones who received lactulose didn't get to finish the preparation and 50% considered the taste "bad, but tolerable". The most common subjective symptom after the medication was nausea, especially after lactulose. During the exam, most of the patients who used lactulose had a "light discomfort" and the ones who used polyethilene glycol considered the discomfort as "tolerable". The quality of the preparation was good in 75%, undependable of the medication that was used. Conclusion : Polyethilene glycol was more tolerable when compared to lactulose, without difference on the quality of the preparation.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202014000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-67202014000100003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.27 n.1 2014
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208956849324032