Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ASSIS,Bruno Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira, JEISMANN,Vagner Birk, KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola, FONSECA,Gilton Marques, CECCONELLO,Ivan, HERMAN,Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303
Resumo: ABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications.
id CBCD-1_31c9ce023e9fb6dffd463a312e6757b7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-67202020000100303
network_acronym_str CBCD-1
network_name_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysisHepatectomyLaparoscopyHepatic neoplasms/surgeryComparative studyPropensity scoreABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.33 n.1 2020reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020190001e1494info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessASSIS,Bruno Silva deCOELHO,Fabricio FerreiraJEISMANN,Vagner BirkKRUGER,Jaime Arthur PirolaFONSECA,Gilton MarquesCECCONELLO,IvanHERMAN,Pauloeng2020-05-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202020000100303Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2020-05-14T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
title Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
spellingShingle Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
ASSIS,Bruno Silva de
Hepatectomy
Laparoscopy
Hepatic neoplasms/surgery
Comparative study
Propensity score
title_short Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
title_full Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
title_sort Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
author ASSIS,Bruno Silva de
author_facet ASSIS,Bruno Silva de
COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira
JEISMANN,Vagner Birk
KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola
FONSECA,Gilton Marques
CECCONELLO,Ivan
HERMAN,Paulo
author_role author
author2 COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira
JEISMANN,Vagner Birk
KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola
FONSECA,Gilton Marques
CECCONELLO,Ivan
HERMAN,Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ASSIS,Bruno Silva de
COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira
JEISMANN,Vagner Birk
KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola
FONSECA,Gilton Marques
CECCONELLO,Ivan
HERMAN,Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hepatectomy
Laparoscopy
Hepatic neoplasms/surgery
Comparative study
Propensity score
topic Hepatectomy
Laparoscopy
Hepatic neoplasms/surgery
Comparative study
Propensity score
description ABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1494
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.33 n.1 2020
reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron:CBCD
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
instacron_str CBCD
institution CBCD
reponame_str ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
collection ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaabcd@gmail.com
_version_ 1754208958751440896