Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications. |
id |
CBCD-1_31c9ce023e9fb6dffd463a312e6757b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-67202020000100303 |
network_acronym_str |
CBCD-1 |
network_name_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysisHepatectomyLaparoscopyHepatic neoplasms/surgeryComparative studyPropensity scoreABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.33 n.1 2020reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)instacron:CBCD10.1590/0102-672020190001e1494info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessASSIS,Bruno Silva deCOELHO,Fabricio FerreiraJEISMANN,Vagner BirkKRUGER,Jaime Arthur PirolaFONSECA,Gilton MarquesCECCONELLO,IvanHERMAN,Pauloeng2020-05-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-67202020000100303Revistahttp://abarriguda.org.br/revista/index.php/revistaabarrigudaarepb/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaabcd@gmail.com2317-63262317-6326opendoar:2020-05-14T00:00ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
title |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
spellingShingle |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis ASSIS,Bruno Silva de Hepatectomy Laparoscopy Hepatic neoplasms/surgery Comparative study Propensity score |
title_short |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
title_full |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
title_fullStr |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
title_sort |
Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis |
author |
ASSIS,Bruno Silva de |
author_facet |
ASSIS,Bruno Silva de COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira JEISMANN,Vagner Birk KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola FONSECA,Gilton Marques CECCONELLO,Ivan HERMAN,Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira JEISMANN,Vagner Birk KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola FONSECA,Gilton Marques CECCONELLO,Ivan HERMAN,Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ASSIS,Bruno Silva de COELHO,Fabricio Ferreira JEISMANN,Vagner Birk KRUGER,Jaime Arthur Pirola FONSECA,Gilton Marques CECCONELLO,Ivan HERMAN,Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hepatectomy Laparoscopy Hepatic neoplasms/surgery Comparative study Propensity score |
topic |
Hepatectomy Laparoscopy Hepatic neoplasms/surgery Comparative study Propensity score |
description |
ABSTRACT Background: There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the same comparison group. Aim: To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis (benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by the nearest method. Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs. 352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days, p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a 45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion: Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of perioperative complications. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000100303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0102-672020190001e1494 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) v.33 n.1 2020 reponame:ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) instacron:CBCD |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
instacron_str |
CBCD |
institution |
CBCD |
reponame_str |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
collection |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaabcd@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754208958751440896 |