COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Emparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sardi-Correa,Carolina, López-Ulloa,Juan Alberto, Viteri-Soria,Jaime, Penniecook,Jason A., Jimenez-Román,Jesús, Lansingh,Van C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300016
Resumo: ABSTRACT To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.
id CBO-2_1ca610986f1e0a635727a56b67e80426
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492020000300016
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence reviewCOVID-19OphthalmologySARS-CoV-2ConjunctivaOcularABSTRACT To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300016Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.3 2020reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.5935/0004-2749.20200067info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEmparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-deSardi-Correa,CarolinaLópez-Ulloa,Juan AlbertoViteri-Soria,JaimePenniecook,Jason A.Jimenez-Román,JesúsLansingh,Van C.eng2020-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492020000300016Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2020-05-26T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
spellingShingle COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
Emparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-de
COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
title_short COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_full COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_fullStr COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_sort COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
author Emparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-de
author_facet Emparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-de
Sardi-Correa,Carolina
López-Ulloa,Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria,Jaime
Penniecook,Jason A.
Jimenez-Román,Jesús
Lansingh,Van C.
author_role author
author2 Sardi-Correa,Carolina
López-Ulloa,Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria,Jaime
Penniecook,Jason A.
Jimenez-Román,Jesús
Lansingh,Van C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Emparan,Juan Pablo Olivares-de
Sardi-Correa,Carolina
López-Ulloa,Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria,Jaime
Penniecook,Jason A.
Jimenez-Román,Jesús
Lansingh,Van C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
topic COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
description ABSTRACT To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492020000300016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0004-2749.20200067
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.83 n.3 2020
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209030772883456