COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Olivares-de Emparan, Juan Pablo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sardi-Correa, Carolina, López-Ulloa, Juan Alberto, Viteri-Soria, Jaime, Penniecook, Jason A., Jimenez-Román, Jesús, Lansingh, Van C.
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/602
Resumo: To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.
id SCI-1_82a159eeecc7c4d0d2197532380d8135
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/602
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence reviewCOVID-19 e o olho: quanto sabemos realmente? Uma revisão das melhores evidênciasCOVID-19OftalmologiaSARS-CoV-2ConjuntivaOcularCOVID-19OphthalmologySARS-CoV-2ConjunctivaOcularTo identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.Identificar e classificar as informações disponíveis sobre o COVID-19 e o tratamento oftalmológico de acordo com o nível de evidência, dentro de quatro tópicos principais de interesse: evidência do vírus nas lágrimas e na superfície ocular, infecção pela via conjuntival, manifestações oculares e recomendações de melhores práticas. Foi realizada uma revisão estruturada no PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, Biblioteca Cochrane e Google Scholar no COVID-19 e oftalmologia. A planilha de Níveis de Evidência 2011 do Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 foi usada para avaliações de qualidade. Mil e dezoito itens foram identificados na busca; Foram incluídos 26 registros na síntese qualitativa, que incluiu 6 revisões de literatura, 10 séries de casos ou estudos transversais, 4 relatos de casos e 6 descrições de intervenções. Dezessete dos 26 registros (65%) foram classificados como nível 5 no sistema de classificação da metodologia Oxford CBME, o restante foi no nível 4. As evidências geradas no COVID-19 e na oftalmologia até o momento são limitadas, embora isso seja compreensível dadas as circunstâncias. Tanto a possível presença de partículas virais em lágrimas e conjuntiva quanto o potencial de transmissão conjuntival permanecem controversos. As manifestações oculares não são frequentes e podem se assemelhar a infecção viral da superfície ocular. A maioria das recomendações baseia-se nas estratégias implementadas pelos países asiáticos durante surtos anteriores de coronavírus. Há necessidade de estudos aprofundados avaliando essas estratégias no cenário da SARS-CoV-2. Enquanto isso, os planos para a aplicação dessas medidas devem ser implementados com cautela, levando em consideração o contexto de cada país e submetidos a auditorias periódicas.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/602enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/602/774Copyright (c) 2020 Juan Pablo Olivares-de Emparan, Carolina Sardi-Correa, Juan Alberto López-Ulloa, Jaime Viteri-Soria, Jason A. Penniecook, Jesús Jimenez-Román, Van C. Lansinghhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOlivares-de Emparan, Juan PabloSardi-Correa, CarolinaLópez-Ulloa, Juan AlbertoViteri-Soria, JaimePenniecook, Jason A.Jimenez-Román, JesúsLansingh, Van C.reponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-05-27T14:22:24Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/602Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-05-27T14:22:24SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
COVID-19 e o olho: quanto sabemos realmente? Uma revisão das melhores evidências
title COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
spellingShingle COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
Olivares-de Emparan, Juan Pablo
COVID-19
Oftalmologia
SARS-CoV-2
Conjuntiva
Ocular
COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
title_short COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_full COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_fullStr COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
title_sort COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review
author Olivares-de Emparan, Juan Pablo
author_facet Olivares-de Emparan, Juan Pablo
Sardi-Correa, Carolina
López-Ulloa, Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria, Jaime
Penniecook, Jason A.
Jimenez-Román, Jesús
Lansingh, Van C.
author_role author
author2 Sardi-Correa, Carolina
López-Ulloa, Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria, Jaime
Penniecook, Jason A.
Jimenez-Román, Jesús
Lansingh, Van C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Olivares-de Emparan, Juan Pablo
Sardi-Correa, Carolina
López-Ulloa, Juan Alberto
Viteri-Soria, Jaime
Penniecook, Jason A.
Jimenez-Román, Jesús
Lansingh, Van C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Oftalmologia
SARS-CoV-2
Conjuntiva
Ocular
COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
topic COVID-19
Oftalmologia
SARS-CoV-2
Conjuntiva
Ocular
COVID-19
Ophthalmology
SARS-CoV-2
Conjunctiva
Ocular
description To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/602
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/602
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/602/774
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047817952296960