WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kerche,Fábio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002020000300641
Resumo: ABSTRACT This essay analyzes the prosecution models espoused in Brazil and in the US when the accused party is the president. Both the head of the Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the American prosecutor, ad hoc, were given a high degree of autonomy, which was reduced after scandals. Between the “autonomy to fight corruption” or “stability in the political system”, the latter prevailed after experiments with autonomous prosecutors.
id CEBRAP-1_d5175bbfc7ec0ce70f886228c1f8ac55
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-33002020000300641
network_acronym_str CEBRAP-1
network_name_str Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” ProsecutorPublic Prosecutor’s OfficeDemocracyAutonomyAccountabilityABSTRACT This essay analyzes the prosecution models espoused in Brazil and in the US when the accused party is the president. Both the head of the Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the American prosecutor, ad hoc, were given a high degree of autonomy, which was reduced after scandals. Between the “autonomy to fight corruption” or “stability in the political system”, the latter prevailed after experiments with autonomous prosecutors.Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002020000300641Novos estudos CEBRAP v.39 n.3 2020reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)instacron:CEBRAP10.25091/s01013300202000030011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKerche,Fábioeng2021-01-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-33002020000300641Revistahttp://novosestudos.uol.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br1980-54030101-3300opendoar:2021-01-12T00:00Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
title WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
spellingShingle WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
Kerche,Fábio
Public Prosecutor’s Office
Democracy
Autonomy
Accountability
title_short WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
title_full WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
title_fullStr WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
title_full_unstemmed WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
title_sort WHEN THE PARTY ACCUSED OF A CRIME IS THE PRESIDENT: The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the US “ad hoc” Prosecutor
author Kerche,Fábio
author_facet Kerche,Fábio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kerche,Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public Prosecutor’s Office
Democracy
Autonomy
Accountability
topic Public Prosecutor’s Office
Democracy
Autonomy
Accountability
description ABSTRACT This essay analyzes the prosecution models espoused in Brazil and in the US when the accused party is the president. Both the head of the Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the American prosecutor, ad hoc, were given a high degree of autonomy, which was reduced after scandals. Between the “autonomy to fight corruption” or “stability in the political system”, the latter prevailed after experiments with autonomous prosecutors.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002020000300641
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-33002020000300641
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.25091/s01013300202000030011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Novos estudos CEBRAP v.39 n.3 2020
reponame:Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
instname:Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
instacron:CEBRAP
instname_str Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
instacron_str CEBRAP
institution CEBRAP
reponame_str Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
collection Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Novos estudos CEBRAP (Online) - Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||novosestudos@cebrap.org.br
_version_ 1754208899200712704

Registros relacionados