Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal-Kaymalyz,Carla Gislaine
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Herrera-Lillo,Antonieta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300512
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to study the validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists, regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in evaluation and intervention processes. Methods: a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, nonexperimental study. A total of 123 professionals from the Region of Valparaíso, Chile, with degrees in speech-language-hearing therapy, participated in the study. They answered the questionnaire that measures their opinion and knowledge on the use of ICTs. Results: the questionnaire had an adequate level of stability, as the Cronbach's α and Guttman's λ6 coefficient values were respectively 0.85 and 0.95. When studying each item, adequate levels of stability were obtained. On the other hand, the corrected homogeneity index (CHI) yielded values lower than 0.2 for items A8, A9, A17, A18, A26, A27, A42, A43, and A46, which suggests not considering them due to a lack of correlation between these items and the overall questionnaire score. Regarding content validity, assessed with the Question Appraisal System, 100% of the questions presented no major semantic problems. Conclusion: the results of the study indicate that the ICT questionnaire is valid and reliable.
id CEFAC-1_2f29a355225bc0b321d158e33d03743e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462021000300512
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processesReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSpeech, Language and Hearing SciencesInformation TechnologyABSTRACT Purpose: to study the validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists, regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in evaluation and intervention processes. Methods: a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, nonexperimental study. A total of 123 professionals from the Region of Valparaíso, Chile, with degrees in speech-language-hearing therapy, participated in the study. They answered the questionnaire that measures their opinion and knowledge on the use of ICTs. Results: the questionnaire had an adequate level of stability, as the Cronbach's α and Guttman's λ6 coefficient values were respectively 0.85 and 0.95. When studying each item, adequate levels of stability were obtained. On the other hand, the corrected homogeneity index (CHI) yielded values lower than 0.2 for items A8, A9, A17, A18, A26, A27, A42, A43, and A46, which suggests not considering them due to a lack of correlation between these items and the overall questionnaire score. Regarding content validity, assessed with the Question Appraisal System, 100% of the questions presented no major semantic problems. Conclusion: the results of the study indicate that the ICT questionnaire is valid and reliable.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300512Revista CEFAC v.23 n.3 2021reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20212335421info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal-Kaymalyz,Carla GislaineHerrera-Lillo,Antonietaeng2021-11-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462021000300512Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2021-11-30T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
title Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
spellingShingle Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
Leal-Kaymalyz,Carla Gislaine
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Information Technology
title_short Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
title_full Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
title_sort Validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in speech-language-hearing evaluation and intervention processes
author Leal-Kaymalyz,Carla Gislaine
author_facet Leal-Kaymalyz,Carla Gislaine
Herrera-Lillo,Antonieta
author_role author
author2 Herrera-Lillo,Antonieta
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal-Kaymalyz,Carla Gislaine
Herrera-Lillo,Antonieta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Information Technology
topic Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
Information Technology
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to study the validity and reliability of the questionnaire that measures the perception of speech-language-hearing therapists, regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in evaluation and intervention processes. Methods: a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, nonexperimental study. A total of 123 professionals from the Region of Valparaíso, Chile, with degrees in speech-language-hearing therapy, participated in the study. They answered the questionnaire that measures their opinion and knowledge on the use of ICTs. Results: the questionnaire had an adequate level of stability, as the Cronbach's α and Guttman's λ6 coefficient values were respectively 0.85 and 0.95. When studying each item, adequate levels of stability were obtained. On the other hand, the corrected homogeneity index (CHI) yielded values lower than 0.2 for items A8, A9, A17, A18, A26, A27, A42, A43, and A46, which suggests not considering them due to a lack of correlation between these items and the overall questionnaire score. Regarding content validity, assessed with the Question Appraisal System, 100% of the questions presented no major semantic problems. Conclusion: the results of the study indicate that the ICT questionnaire is valid and reliable.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300512
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300512
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/20212335421
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.23 n.3 2021
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582691414016