Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista CEFAC (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100509 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the implementation of hearing conservation programs in two large companies. Methods: an evaluative research that analyzed a type 1b implementation. The study was conducted in three stages, namely: establishing the company’s degree of implementation, analyzing the companies’ policies and structures, and lastly, analyzing the influence of the companies’ policies and structures on their degree of implementation. The following analyses were conducted to collect data: interviews, document analysis, and observation. Results: the hearing conservation program in Company A was classified as implemented (91.1%), while in Company B, it was partially implemented (62.7%). The context in Company A was favorable to implementing the program, whereas in Company B, the context was considered unfavorable, due to disadvantageous categories. Also, the characteristics of the implementation context influenced the placement of the program either positively or negatively. Conclusion: there were satisfactory results regarding the implementation of the hearing conservation program in both companies assessed. |
id |
CEFAC-1_4cbaca87edb1e5fbe06130377bd3450b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-18462021000100509 |
network_acronym_str |
CEFAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation ProgramsHealth AssessmentNoise-Induced Hearing LossProgram EvaluationABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the implementation of hearing conservation programs in two large companies. Methods: an evaluative research that analyzed a type 1b implementation. The study was conducted in three stages, namely: establishing the company’s degree of implementation, analyzing the companies’ policies and structures, and lastly, analyzing the influence of the companies’ policies and structures on their degree of implementation. The following analyses were conducted to collect data: interviews, document analysis, and observation. Results: the hearing conservation program in Company A was classified as implemented (91.1%), while in Company B, it was partially implemented (62.7%). The context in Company A was favorable to implementing the program, whereas in Company B, the context was considered unfavorable, due to disadvantageous categories. Also, the characteristics of the implementation context influenced the placement of the program either positively or negatively. Conclusion: there were satisfactory results regarding the implementation of the hearing conservation program in both companies assessed.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100509Revista CEFAC v.23 n.1 2021reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/20212317620info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPimenta,Alcineide da SilvaSilva,Vanessa Maria daTeixeira,Cleide FernandesNascimento,Cynthia Maria Barboza doMuniz,Lílian FerreiraLopes,Adalva Virgínia CoutoGomes,Suzy MariaLima,Maria Luiza Lopes Timóteo deeng2021-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462021000100509Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2021-02-02T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
title |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs Pimenta,Alcineide da Silva Health Assessment Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Program Evaluation |
title_short |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
title_full |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
title_sort |
Analysis of the implementation of Hearing Conservation Programs |
author |
Pimenta,Alcineide da Silva |
author_facet |
Pimenta,Alcineide da Silva Silva,Vanessa Maria da Teixeira,Cleide Fernandes Nascimento,Cynthia Maria Barboza do Muniz,Lílian Ferreira Lopes,Adalva Virgínia Couto Gomes,Suzy Maria Lima,Maria Luiza Lopes Timóteo de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Vanessa Maria da Teixeira,Cleide Fernandes Nascimento,Cynthia Maria Barboza do Muniz,Lílian Ferreira Lopes,Adalva Virgínia Couto Gomes,Suzy Maria Lima,Maria Luiza Lopes Timóteo de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pimenta,Alcineide da Silva Silva,Vanessa Maria da Teixeira,Cleide Fernandes Nascimento,Cynthia Maria Barboza do Muniz,Lílian Ferreira Lopes,Adalva Virgínia Couto Gomes,Suzy Maria Lima,Maria Luiza Lopes Timóteo de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Assessment Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Program Evaluation |
topic |
Health Assessment Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Program Evaluation |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose: to assess the implementation of hearing conservation programs in two large companies. Methods: an evaluative research that analyzed a type 1b implementation. The study was conducted in three stages, namely: establishing the company’s degree of implementation, analyzing the companies’ policies and structures, and lastly, analyzing the influence of the companies’ policies and structures on their degree of implementation. The following analyses were conducted to collect data: interviews, document analysis, and observation. Results: the hearing conservation program in Company A was classified as implemented (91.1%), while in Company B, it was partially implemented (62.7%). The context in Company A was favorable to implementing the program, whereas in Company B, the context was considered unfavorable, due to disadvantageous categories. Also, the characteristics of the implementation context influenced the placement of the program either positively or negatively. Conclusion: there were satisfactory results regarding the implementation of the hearing conservation program in both companies assessed. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100509 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000100509 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-0216/20212317620 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC v.23 n.1 2021 reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online) instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) instacron:CEFAC |
instname_str |
Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
instacron_str |
CEFAC |
institution |
CEFAC |
reponame_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
collection |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacefac@cefac.br |
_version_ |
1754122582635839488 |