Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Cláudia da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Alves,Patrícia do Valle
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300506
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare vocabulary performances and verify the lexical competence of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write. Methods: 93 first-grade students were divided into Group I (50 students without difficulties) and Group II (43 students with difficulties learning to read and write). They were administered the Child Language Test focusing on vocabulary. The analysis considered aspects of usual word designation, non-designation, and substitution process. The data analysis was conducted with the Mann-Whitney test, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Results: there were significant performances in the comparison between the groups in all the conceptual fields analyzed. There was no significance for either group regarding the conceptual fields of Foods, Furniture and Appliances, Places, and Professions in non-designation; regarding Means of Transportation in substitution processes; regarding Toys and Musical Instruments in both non-designation and substitution processes. Group I had higher means than Group II in usual word designation, and lower ones in non-designation and substitution processes. Conclusion: students with difficulties learning to read and write had greater difficulties in usual word designation, as well as higher error indexes in substitution processes and non-designation, which reveals a deficient vocabulary concerning lexical access in comparison with students without difficulties.
id CEFAC-1_707d3c318ba3c9894175d4c42f8e9184
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462021000300506
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and writeVocabularyLearningLanguageChild DevelopmentSpeech, Language and Hearing SciencesABSTRACT Purpose: to compare vocabulary performances and verify the lexical competence of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write. Methods: 93 first-grade students were divided into Group I (50 students without difficulties) and Group II (43 students with difficulties learning to read and write). They were administered the Child Language Test focusing on vocabulary. The analysis considered aspects of usual word designation, non-designation, and substitution process. The data analysis was conducted with the Mann-Whitney test, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Results: there were significant performances in the comparison between the groups in all the conceptual fields analyzed. There was no significance for either group regarding the conceptual fields of Foods, Furniture and Appliances, Places, and Professions in non-designation; regarding Means of Transportation in substitution processes; regarding Toys and Musical Instruments in both non-designation and substitution processes. Group I had higher means than Group II in usual word designation, and lower ones in non-designation and substitution processes. Conclusion: students with difficulties learning to read and write had greater difficulties in usual word designation, as well as higher error indexes in substitution processes and non-designation, which reveals a deficient vocabulary concerning lexical access in comparison with students without difficulties.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300506Revista CEFAC v.23 n.3 2021reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/202123312020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Cláudia daAlves,Patrícia do Valleeng2021-04-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462021000300506Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2021-04-09T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
title Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
spellingShingle Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
Silva,Cláudia da
Vocabulary
Learning
Language
Child Development
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
title_short Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
title_full Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
title_fullStr Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
title_full_unstemmed Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
title_sort Vocabulary performance of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write
author Silva,Cláudia da
author_facet Silva,Cláudia da
Alves,Patrícia do Valle
author_role author
author2 Alves,Patrícia do Valle
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Cláudia da
Alves,Patrícia do Valle
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vocabulary
Learning
Language
Child Development
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
topic Vocabulary
Learning
Language
Child Development
Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to compare vocabulary performances and verify the lexical competence of students with and without difficulties learning to read and write. Methods: 93 first-grade students were divided into Group I (50 students without difficulties) and Group II (43 students with difficulties learning to read and write). They were administered the Child Language Test focusing on vocabulary. The analysis considered aspects of usual word designation, non-designation, and substitution process. The data analysis was conducted with the Mann-Whitney test, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Results: there were significant performances in the comparison between the groups in all the conceptual fields analyzed. There was no significance for either group regarding the conceptual fields of Foods, Furniture and Appliances, Places, and Professions in non-designation; regarding Means of Transportation in substitution processes; regarding Toys and Musical Instruments in both non-designation and substitution processes. Group I had higher means than Group II in usual word designation, and lower ones in non-designation and substitution processes. Conclusion: students with difficulties learning to read and write had greater difficulties in usual word designation, as well as higher error indexes in substitution processes and non-designation, which reveals a deficient vocabulary concerning lexical access in comparison with students without difficulties.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300506
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462021000300506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/202123312020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.23 n.3 2021
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582681976832