Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Menezes,Denise Costa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral, Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de, Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo, Advincula,Karina Paes, Menezes,Pedro de Lemos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista CEFAC (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable.
id CEFAC-1_bf4d650241af386d1202aea00b4ebe3f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-18462020000600506
network_acronym_str CEFAC-1
network_name_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following ResponseSpeech PerceptionPerceptual MaskingNoiseAuditory-Evoked PotentialsProtocolsElectrophysiologyABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506Revista CEFAC v.22 n.6 2020reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/202022611219info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenezes,Denise CostaGriz,Silvana Maria SobralAraújo,Anne Karoline Lima deVenâncio,Leonardo Gleygson AngeloAdvincula,Karina PaesMenezes,Pedro de Lemoseng2020-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462020000600506Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2020-10-23T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
title Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
spellingShingle Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
Menezes,Denise Costa
Speech Perception
Perceptual Masking
Noise
Auditory-Evoked Potentials
Protocols
Electrophysiology
title_short Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
title_full Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
title_fullStr Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
title_full_unstemmed Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
title_sort Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
author Menezes,Denise Costa
author_facet Menezes,Denise Costa
Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral
Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de
Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo
Advincula,Karina Paes
Menezes,Pedro de Lemos
author_role author
author2 Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral
Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de
Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo
Advincula,Karina Paes
Menezes,Pedro de Lemos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menezes,Denise Costa
Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral
Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de
Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo
Advincula,Karina Paes
Menezes,Pedro de Lemos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Speech Perception
Perceptual Masking
Noise
Auditory-Evoked Potentials
Protocols
Electrophysiology
topic Speech Perception
Perceptual Masking
Noise
Auditory-Evoked Potentials
Protocols
Electrophysiology
description ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-0216/202022611219
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC v.22 n.6 2020
reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)
instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron:CEFAC
instname_str Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
instacron_str CEFAC
institution CEFAC
reponame_str Revista CEFAC (Online)
collection Revista CEFAC (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacefac@cefac.br
_version_ 1754122582604382208