Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista CEFAC (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable. |
id |
CEFAC-1_bf4d650241af386d1202aea00b4ebe3f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-18462020000600506 |
network_acronym_str |
CEFAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following ResponseSpeech PerceptionPerceptual MaskingNoiseAuditory-Evoked PotentialsProtocolsElectrophysiologyABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable.ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506Revista CEFAC v.22 n.6 2020reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online)instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)instacron:CEFAC10.1590/1982-0216/202022611219info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenezes,Denise CostaGriz,Silvana Maria SobralAraújo,Anne Karoline Lima deVenâncio,Leonardo Gleygson AngeloAdvincula,Karina PaesMenezes,Pedro de Lemoseng2020-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-18462020000600506Revistahttp://www.revistacefac.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacefac@cefac.br1982-02161516-1846opendoar:2020-10-23T00:00Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
title |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
spellingShingle |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response Menezes,Denise Costa Speech Perception Perceptual Masking Noise Auditory-Evoked Potentials Protocols Electrophysiology |
title_short |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
title_full |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
title_fullStr |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
title_sort |
Assessment protocols for forward masking in Frequency-Following Response |
author |
Menezes,Denise Costa |
author_facet |
Menezes,Denise Costa Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo Advincula,Karina Paes Menezes,Pedro de Lemos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo Advincula,Karina Paes Menezes,Pedro de Lemos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Menezes,Denise Costa Griz,Silvana Maria Sobral Araújo,Anne Karoline Lima de Venâncio,Leonardo Gleygson Angelo Advincula,Karina Paes Menezes,Pedro de Lemos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Speech Perception Perceptual Masking Noise Auditory-Evoked Potentials Protocols Electrophysiology |
topic |
Speech Perception Perceptual Masking Noise Auditory-Evoked Potentials Protocols Electrophysiology |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000600506 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-0216/202022611219 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRAMO Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC v.22 n.6 2020 reponame:Revista CEFAC (Online) instname:Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) instacron:CEFAC |
instname_str |
Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
instacron_str |
CEFAC |
institution |
CEFAC |
reponame_str |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
collection |
Revista CEFAC (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista CEFAC (Online) - Centro de Especialização em Fonoaudiologia Clínica (CEFAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacefac@cefac.br |
_version_ |
1754122582604382208 |