Organizational learning from good practices in university management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/2787 |
Resumo: | Good practices in higher education should be exemplifying and possible to replicate, generating learning for every organization, and become a strategic factor in its management. This research deepens the good university practices of the International Telescopi Network that groups Latin American institutions. Methodically, 133 reports were analyzed between 2001 and 2016 from 54 universities in Latin America and Europe, using descriptive statistics and analysis of relations with the Atlas.ti software. Six areas of best practice were identified: undergraduate professor management, postgraduate professor, administrative, community engagement as well as academic and service management. According to the EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) model, the criteria of processes, products and services is the most prominent. |
id |
CESGRAN-1_d5240327e762917cfc9ca2c32070ceab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/2787 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRAN-1 |
network_name_str |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Organizational learning from good practices in university managementUniversities; Management; Good practices; Benchmarking; TelescopiGood practices in higher education should be exemplifying and possible to replicate, generating learning for every organization, and become a strategic factor in its management. This research deepens the good university practices of the International Telescopi Network that groups Latin American institutions. Methodically, 133 reports were analyzed between 2001 and 2016 from 54 universities in Latin America and Europe, using descriptive statistics and analysis of relations with the Atlas.ti software. Six areas of best practice were identified: undergraduate professor management, postgraduate professor, administrative, community engagement as well as academic and service management. According to the EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) model, the criteria of processes, products and services is the most prominent.Fundação CesgranrioGrupo de investigación en Dirección Universitaria de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, España.King-Domínguez, AndreaAméstica-Rivas, LuisLlinas-Audet, Xavier2020-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/278710.22347/2175-2753v12i37.2787Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 12, n. 37 (2020): Revista Meta: Avaliação Out./Dez.; 869-8922175-2753reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIOenghttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/2787/pdfIberoamérica2001-2016university experiencesDireitos autorais 2020 Fundacao Cesgranriohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-02-01T21:27:05Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/2787Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/indexPRIhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/oaimetaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br2175-27532175-2753opendoar:2021-02-01T21:27:05Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
title |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
spellingShingle |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management King-Domínguez, Andrea Universities; Management; Good practices; Benchmarking; Telescopi |
title_short |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
title_full |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
title_fullStr |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
title_sort |
Organizational learning from good practices in university management |
author |
King-Domínguez, Andrea |
author_facet |
King-Domínguez, Andrea Améstica-Rivas, Luis Llinas-Audet, Xavier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Améstica-Rivas, Luis Llinas-Audet, Xavier |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de investigación en Dirección Universitaria de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, España. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
King-Domínguez, Andrea Améstica-Rivas, Luis Llinas-Audet, Xavier |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Universities; Management; Good practices; Benchmarking; Telescopi |
topic |
Universities; Management; Good practices; Benchmarking; Telescopi |
description |
Good practices in higher education should be exemplifying and possible to replicate, generating learning for every organization, and become a strategic factor in its management. This research deepens the good university practices of the International Telescopi Network that groups Latin American institutions. Methodically, 133 reports were analyzed between 2001 and 2016 from 54 universities in Latin America and Europe, using descriptive statistics and analysis of relations with the Atlas.ti software. Six areas of best practice were identified: undergraduate professor management, postgraduate professor, administrative, community engagement as well as academic and service management. According to the EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) model, the criteria of processes, products and services is the most prominent. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-16 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/2787 10.22347/2175-2753v12i37.2787 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/2787 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22347/2175-2753v12i37.2787 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/metaavaliacao/article/view/2787/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Fundacao Cesgranrio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Fundacao Cesgranrio http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Iberoamérica 2001-2016 university experiences |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Meta: Avaliação; v. 12, n. 37 (2020): Revista Meta: Avaliação Out./Dez.; 869-892 2175-2753 reponame:Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO |
institution |
CESGRANRIO |
reponame_str |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
collection |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meta: avaliação (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
metaavaliacao@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754845672232714240 |