The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/593 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to present some reflections on the relationship network that is established under the ten dimensions approached by the Sistema Nacional de Avaliação do Ensino Superior - SINAES (Brazilian National System to Assess Superior Education) at the contemporary scene. All of the ten dimensions are inter-related in the university resulting in personal, ideas, facts, and practices networks. They are networks of networks. These nets are made up of a complex mesh that requires from the community the knowledge of the identity of the university culture, with the commitment of ethically garanteeing the accuracy of reports from all social players envolved with the assessment. Considering the evaluation of a large structure institution, there is an enlargement of difficulties for accomplishing, in all dimensions, a coherent and a consistent assessment process, taking in account administrative and academic aspects in the evaluation process analysis. This is the task to be accomplished by administrative and academic institutional groups enforced by the internal committee for assessment (CPA) and by operational coordination for pedagogical issues (COP). |
id |
CESGRANRIO_26c6b2d4ff5113ea478856685e1a12c5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/593 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networksLas dimensiones de la auto evaluacion Institucional tejiendo redes de redesAs dimensoes da auto-avaliação institucional: tecendo redes de redesRed de relaciones; Auto-evaluacion institucional; UniversidadRelationship network; Evaluation process; UniversityRedes de relacoes; Auto-avaliação institucional; UniversidadeThe aim of this article is to present some reflections on the relationship network that is established under the ten dimensions approached by the Sistema Nacional de Avaliação do Ensino Superior - SINAES (Brazilian National System to Assess Superior Education) at the contemporary scene. All of the ten dimensions are inter-related in the university resulting in personal, ideas, facts, and practices networks. They are networks of networks. These nets are made up of a complex mesh that requires from the community the knowledge of the identity of the university culture, with the commitment of ethically garanteeing the accuracy of reports from all social players envolved with the assessment. Considering the evaluation of a large structure institution, there is an enlargement of difficulties for accomplishing, in all dimensions, a coherent and a consistent assessment process, taking in account administrative and academic aspects in the evaluation process analysis. This is the task to be accomplished by administrative and academic institutional groups enforced by the internal committee for assessment (CPA) and by operational coordination for pedagogical issues (COP).En este artículo se presentan reflexiones acerca de la red de las diez dimensiones propuestas por el Sistema Nacional de Evaluacion de la Educacion Superior (SINAES). Cada una de estas dimensiones se interrelaciona con las otras, estableciendo vinculos entre las personas, las ideas, los eventos y las practicas dinamizadas en el contexto de la universidad. Ellas son redes de redes, que se constituyen en una trama compleja que exige el conocimiento de la identidad y de la cultura de la universidad, con el compromiso de garantizar la credibilidad de los actores sociales participantes de la evaluacion. Bajo el punto de vista la evaluacion de una institucion de gran porte, las dificultades se abultan para el logro coherente y consistente del proceso evaluativo, en todas las dimensiones, en especial los aspectos administrativos y academicos involucrados en el analisis del proceso evaluativo. Esta es la tarea a ser llevada a cabo por los grupos institucionales administrativos y academicos, incluso la propia Comision Propia de Evaluacion (CPA) y la Coordinacion Operacional Pedagogica (COP).Este artigo tem o proposito de apresentar algumas reflexoes sobre a rede de relacoes que se configuram nas dez dimensoes abordadas pelo Sistema Nacional de Avaliação do Ensino Superior – SINAES, no âmbito do cenario contemporâneo. Cada uma dessas dimensoes relaciona-se com as demais, estabelecendo redes entre pessoas, ideias, acontecimentos e práticas veiculadas no interior da universidade. Sao redes de redes. Constituem-se em uma trama complexa que exige da comunidade o conhecimento da identidade da cultura universitaria, com o compromisso de garantir eticamente a fidedignidade dos relatos dos atores sociais participantes da avaliação. Tendo em vista a avaliação de uma instituicao de grande porte, avolumam-se as dificuldades para a realização coerente e consistente do processo avaliativo, em todas as dimensoes, considerando-se os aspectos administrativos e academicos envolvidos na analise dos processos avaliativos. Essa e tarefa a ser desempenhada pelos grupos institucionais administrativos e academicos, apoiados pela Comissao Propria de Avaliação (CPA) e pela Coordenação Operacional Pedagogica (COP).Fundação CesgranrioNunes, Lina Cardoso2006-07-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/593Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 14, n. 52 (2006): Revista Ensaio - Jul./Set.; 339-3481809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; en; esDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-07-10T16:27:47Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/593Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2015-07-10T16:27:47Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks Las dimensiones de la auto evaluacion Institucional tejiendo redes de redes As dimensoes da auto-avaliação institucional: tecendo redes de redes |
title |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
spellingShingle |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks Nunes, Lina Cardoso Red de relaciones; Auto-evaluacion institucional; Universidad Relationship network; Evaluation process; University Redes de relacoes; Auto-avaliação institucional; Universidade |
title_short |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
title_full |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
title_fullStr |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
title_sort |
The dimensions of institutional self-evaluation: building networks of networks |
author |
Nunes, Lina Cardoso |
author_facet |
Nunes, Lina Cardoso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nunes, Lina Cardoso |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Red de relaciones; Auto-evaluacion institucional; Universidad Relationship network; Evaluation process; University Redes de relacoes; Auto-avaliação institucional; Universidade |
topic |
Red de relaciones; Auto-evaluacion institucional; Universidad Relationship network; Evaluation process; University Redes de relacoes; Auto-avaliação institucional; Universidade |
description |
The aim of this article is to present some reflections on the relationship network that is established under the ten dimensions approached by the Sistema Nacional de Avaliação do Ensino Superior - SINAES (Brazilian National System to Assess Superior Education) at the contemporary scene. All of the ten dimensions are inter-related in the university resulting in personal, ideas, facts, and practices networks. They are networks of networks. These nets are made up of a complex mesh that requires from the community the knowledge of the identity of the university culture, with the commitment of ethically garanteeing the accuracy of reports from all social players envolved with the assessment. Considering the evaluation of a large structure institution, there is an enlargement of difficulties for accomplishing, in all dimensions, a coherent and a consistent assessment process, taking in account administrative and academic aspects in the evaluation process analysis. This is the task to be accomplished by administrative and academic institutional groups enforced by the internal committee for assessment (CPA) and by operational coordination for pedagogical issues (COP). |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-07-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/593 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/593 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
language_invalid_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 14, n. 52 (2006): Revista Ensaio - Jul./Set.; 339-348 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832031406096384 |