Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Minhoto, Maria Angelica Pedra
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Penna, Marieta Gouvea de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Título da fonte: Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/457
Resumo: The dissatisfaction about the results of basic education performance in Brazil is high, and the National Assessment of Education still indicates a persistent gap in the area. In response to this fact, the Department of Education of Sao Paulo State has proposed measures to encourage its teachers financially. In addition to the performance bonuses, already in force, a system based on the promotion by merit within the teaching career was sent to the Legislative Assembly as a Supplementary Bill (PLC). This article dicusses the limits of the principles and the efficiency of PLC, based on the positive correlation between increase in compensation and performance improvement. It also analyzes the limits of the concept of quality education coupled with the logic of market. We present the precepts and inconsistencies of the PLC, the results of international studies related to the effectiveness of policies for merit pay, and finally we make some considerations about the PLC, in view of the international experience.
id CESGRANRIO_5cdb25b1b5cd3c54e8bbddea65e9d1e7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/457
network_acronym_str CESGRANRIO
network_name_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?¿Valoracion del magisterio o darwinismo profesional?Valorização do magisterio ou darwinismo profissional?Magisterio; Carrera; RemuneracionTeaching; Career; Merit payMagisterio; Carreira; RemuneraçãoThe dissatisfaction about the results of basic education performance in Brazil is high, and the National Assessment of Education still indicates a persistent gap in the area. In response to this fact, the Department of Education of Sao Paulo State has proposed measures to encourage its teachers financially. In addition to the performance bonuses, already in force, a system based on the promotion by merit within the teaching career was sent to the Legislative Assembly as a Supplementary Bill (PLC). This article dicusses the limits of the principles and the efficiency of PLC, based on the positive correlation between increase in compensation and performance improvement. It also analyzes the limits of the concept of quality education coupled with the logic of market. We present the precepts and inconsistencies of the PLC, the results of international studies related to the effectiveness of policies for merit pay, and finally we make some considerations about the PLC, in view of the international experience.Existe mucha insatisfaccion con respecto al desempeño de la educacion basica en Brasil, y, por otro lado, las evaluaciones de monitoreo continúan señalando vacios en los sistemas de educacion. Como respuesta, la Direccion General de Escuelas del Estado de San Pablo ha propuesto medidas para apoyar financieramente a sus maestros. Ademas de las primas por rendimiento, ya en vigor, se envio a la Asamblea Legislativa un Proyecto de Ley Complementaria (PLC) que establece un sistema de promocion por meritos a la carrera docente. Este artículo aborda los limites del principio de eficiencia del PLC, basado en la correlacion entre el aumento de las remuneraciones y la mejora del rendimiento, tambien aborda los limites del concepto de calidad de la educacion asociado a la logica del mercado. Se presentan los preceptos y las discrepancias del PLC, resultados de estudios internacionales sobre la eficácia de las politicas de remuneracion por merito y, finalmente, se hacen algunas consideraciones sobre el PLC, en vista de la experiencia internacional.A insatisfação em relação ao desempenho da educação basica e grande, e as avaliações de monitoramento persistem indicando lacunas nos sistemas de ensino. Em resposta, a Secretaria de Educação de Sao Paulo propôs medidas de incentivos financeiros ao magisterio paulista. Alem do bônus por desempenho, foi enviado à Assembleia Legislativa um Projeto de Lei Complementar (PLC) que institui o sistema de promocao por merito. Este artigo discute os limites do principio de eficiencia do PLC, tendo em vista assentar-se na correlação entre aumento da remuneração e melhoria de desempenho.Analisa tambem os limites do conceito de qualidade educacional atrelado à logica de mercado. Sao apresentados preceitos e incongruencias do PLC, resultados de trabalhos internacionais que testaram a eficiencia de politicas de remuneração por merito e, finalmente, sao tecidas consideracoes em relação ao PLC, tendo em vista a experiencia internacional.Fundação CesgranrioMinhoto, Maria Angelica PedraPenna, Marieta Gouvea de Oliveira2011-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/457Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 19, n. 70 (2011): Revista Ensaio - Jan./Mar.; 149-1641809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; en; esDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-08-14T21:24:19Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/457Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2015-08-14T21:24:19Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
¿Valoracion del magisterio o darwinismo profesional?
Valorização do magisterio ou darwinismo profissional?
title Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
spellingShingle Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
Minhoto, Maria Angelica Pedra
Magisterio; Carrera; Remuneracion
Teaching; Career; Merit pay
Magisterio; Carreira; Remuneração
title_short Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
title_full Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
title_fullStr Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
title_full_unstemmed Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
title_sort Teaching valorization or professional darwinism?
author Minhoto, Maria Angelica Pedra
author_facet Minhoto, Maria Angelica Pedra
Penna, Marieta Gouvea de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Penna, Marieta Gouvea de Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Minhoto, Maria Angelica Pedra
Penna, Marieta Gouvea de Oliveira
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Magisterio; Carrera; Remuneracion
Teaching; Career; Merit pay
Magisterio; Carreira; Remuneração
topic Magisterio; Carrera; Remuneracion
Teaching; Career; Merit pay
Magisterio; Carreira; Remuneração
description The dissatisfaction about the results of basic education performance in Brazil is high, and the National Assessment of Education still indicates a persistent gap in the area. In response to this fact, the Department of Education of Sao Paulo State has proposed measures to encourage its teachers financially. In addition to the performance bonuses, already in force, a system based on the promotion by merit within the teaching career was sent to the Legislative Assembly as a Supplementary Bill (PLC). This article dicusses the limits of the principles and the efficiency of PLC, based on the positive correlation between increase in compensation and performance improvement. It also analyzes the limits of the concept of quality education coupled with the logic of market. We present the precepts and inconsistencies of the PLC, the results of international studies related to the effectiveness of policies for merit pay, and finally we make some considerations about the PLC, in view of the international experience.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/457
url https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/457
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv pt; en; es
language_invalid_str_mv pt; en; es
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv








dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 19, n. 70 (2011): Revista Ensaio - Jan./Mar.; 149-164
1809-4465
0104-4036
reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron:CESGRANRIO-2
instname_str Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron_str CESGRANRIO-2
institution CESGRANRIO-2
reponame_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br
_version_ 1754832032928628736

Registros relacionados