About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652 |
Resumo: | The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals. |
id |
CESGRANRIO_699fa0bc5a9f59cfa4dff9f1094836a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/1652 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in BrazilSobre la mejoria de la produccion y de la evaluacion de revistas cientificas en BrasilSobre a melhoria da produção e da avaliação de periodicos científicos no Brasilprocesso editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPESeditorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPESproceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPESThe document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals.El documento que presentamos es fruto de la reflexion de Editores de Revistas Cientificas ligadas al FEPAE Sudoeste – Foro de Editores de Revistas del Area de Educacion Sudoeste – y expresa preocupaciones concretas sobre las condiciones materiales para la realizacion de su trabajo, asi como sobre los criterios de evaluacion que vienen siendo utilizados para calificar sus revistas. Presupuestos mas restrictos, el desmonte de estructuras universitarias que sustentaban muchas revistas academicas e indexadores que cada vez complican mas los procedimientos operacionales involucrados en la produccion editorial, fragilizan a las revistas nacionales. Falta de visibilidad sobre los procesos de evaluacion, ausencia de dialogo sobre resultados y cuestiones ligadas a la periodicidad del QUALIS representan incertidumbre para los autores que ven a las revistas como un vehiculo de divulgacion de sus practicas y teorias. Queremos, asi, enriquecer la discusion con la comunidad cientifica y la Agencia Reguladora Gubernamental, sobre los destinos que estaran reservados a las Revistas Cientificas brasileras.O documento que apresentamos e fruto da reflexão de Editores de Periodico Científicos ligados ao FEPAE Sudeste – Forum de Editores de Periodicos da Area de Educação Sudeste – e expressa preocupacoes concretas sobre as condicoes materiais para a realização de seu trabalho, assim como, sobre os criterios de avaliação que vem sendo utilizados para qualificar suas revistas. Orcamentos mais enxutos, o desmonte de estruturas universitarias que sustentavam muitas revistas academicas e indexadores que cada vez mais complicam os procedimentos operacionais envolvidos na produção editorial, fragilizam as revistas nacionais. Falta de visibilidade sobre os processos de avaliação, ausencia de dialogo sobre resultados e questoes ligadas à periodicidade do QUALIS trazem uma inseguranca para os autores que tem nos periodicos o veiculo de divulgação de suas práticas e teorias. Queremos, assim, adensar a discussao com a comunidade cientifica e a Agencia Reguladora Governamental, sobre os destinos que estarao reservados aos Periodicos Científicos brasileiros.Fundação CesgranrioPonce, Branca JuremaSilva, Cicero Barbosa daSousa, Jose dos SantosAnjos, DanielaDias, Erika Simone de Almeida CarlosBerkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete MayAlmeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini deFreitas, Silvana AlvesPietri, Emerson dePrieto, Rosângela GavioliCamargo, EvaniBranco, Jordanna CasteloBizelli, Jose LuisSiman, Lana Mara de CastroMuzzeti, Luci ReginaReis, Magali dosMartins, EdnaBissoto, Maria LuisaCastro, Monica Rabelo deGimenes, NelsonGualtieri, ReginaSilva, RegisRibeiro, RicardoLemes, Sebastiao de Souza2017-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/165210.1590/s0104-40362017002501032Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 97 (2017): Revista Ensaio Out./Dez.; 1032-10441809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2porengspahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/751https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/752https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/753Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-27T16:08:34Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1652Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2018-02-27T16:08:34Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil Sobre la mejoria de la produccion y de la evaluacion de revistas cientificas en Brasil Sobre a melhoria da produção e da avaliação de periodicos científicos no Brasil |
title |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil Ponce, Branca Jurema processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES |
title_short |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
title_full |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
title_sort |
About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil |
author |
Ponce, Branca Jurema |
author_facet |
Ponce, Branca Jurema Silva, Cicero Barbosa da Sousa, Jose dos Santos Anjos, Daniela Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de Freitas, Silvana Alves Pietri, Emerson de Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli Camargo, Evani Branco, Jordanna Castelo Bizelli, Jose Luis Siman, Lana Mara de Castro Muzzeti, Luci Regina Reis, Magali dos Martins, Edna Bissoto, Maria Luisa Castro, Monica Rabelo de Gimenes, Nelson Gualtieri, Regina Silva, Regis Ribeiro, Ricardo Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Cicero Barbosa da Sousa, Jose dos Santos Anjos, Daniela Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de Freitas, Silvana Alves Pietri, Emerson de Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli Camargo, Evani Branco, Jordanna Castelo Bizelli, Jose Luis Siman, Lana Mara de Castro Muzzeti, Luci Regina Reis, Magali dos Martins, Edna Bissoto, Maria Luisa Castro, Monica Rabelo de Gimenes, Nelson Gualtieri, Regina Silva, Regis Ribeiro, Ricardo Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ponce, Branca Jurema Silva, Cicero Barbosa da Sousa, Jose dos Santos Anjos, Daniela Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de Freitas, Silvana Alves Pietri, Emerson de Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli Camargo, Evani Branco, Jordanna Castelo Bizelli, Jose Luis Siman, Lana Mara de Castro Muzzeti, Luci Regina Reis, Magali dos Martins, Edna Bissoto, Maria Luisa Castro, Monica Rabelo de Gimenes, Nelson Gualtieri, Regina Silva, Regis Ribeiro, Ricardo Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES |
topic |
processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES |
description |
The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652 10.1590/s0104-40362017002501032 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s0104-40362017002501032 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
language |
por eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/751 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/752 https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/753 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 97 (2017): Revista Ensaio Out./Dez.; 1032-1044 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832034300166144 |