About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ponce, Branca Jurema
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silva, Cicero Barbosa da, Sousa, Jose dos Santos, Anjos, Daniela, Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos, Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May, Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de, Freitas, Silvana Alves, Pietri, Emerson de, Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli, Camargo, Evani, Branco, Jordanna Castelo, Bizelli, Jose Luis, Siman, Lana Mara de Castro, Muzzeti, Luci Regina, Reis, Magali dos, Martins, Edna, Bissoto, Maria Luisa, Castro, Monica Rabelo de, Gimenes, Nelson, Gualtieri, Regina, Silva, Regis, Ribeiro, Ricardo, Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
spa
Título da fonte: Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652
Resumo: The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals.
id CESGRANRIO_699fa0bc5a9f59cfa4dff9f1094836a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/1652
network_acronym_str CESGRANRIO
network_name_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in BrazilSobre la mejoria de la produccion y de la evaluacion de revistas cientificas en BrasilSobre a melhoria da produção e da avaliação de periodicos científicos no Brasilprocesso editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPESeditorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPESproceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPESThe document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals.El documento que presentamos es fruto de la reflexion de Editores de Revistas Cientificas ligadas al FEPAE Sudoeste – Foro de Editores de Revistas del Area de Educacion Sudoeste – y expresa preocupaciones concretas sobre las condiciones materiales para la realizacion de su trabajo, asi como sobre los criterios de evaluacion que vienen siendo utilizados para calificar sus revistas. Presupuestos mas restrictos, el desmonte de estructuras universitarias que sustentaban muchas revistas academicas e indexadores que cada vez complican mas los procedimientos operacionales involucrados en la produccion editorial, fragilizan a las revistas nacionales. Falta de visibilidad sobre los procesos de evaluacion, ausencia de dialogo sobre resultados y cuestiones ligadas a la periodicidad del QUALIS representan incertidumbre para los autores que ven a las revistas como un vehiculo de divulgacion de sus practicas y teorias. Queremos, asi, enriquecer la discusion con la comunidad cientifica y la Agencia Reguladora Gubernamental, sobre los destinos que estaran reservados a las Revistas Cientificas brasileras.O documento que apresentamos e fruto da reflexão de Editores de Periodico Científicos ligados ao FEPAE Sudeste – Forum de Editores de Periodicos da Area de Educação Sudeste – e expressa preocupacoes concretas sobre as condicoes materiais para a realização de seu trabalho, assim como, sobre os criterios de avaliação que vem sendo utilizados para qualificar suas revistas. Orcamentos mais enxutos, o desmonte de estruturas universitarias que sustentavam muitas revistas academicas e indexadores que cada vez mais complicam os procedimentos operacionais envolvidos na produção editorial, fragilizam as revistas nacionais. Falta de visibilidade sobre os processos de avaliação, ausencia de dialogo sobre resultados e questoes ligadas à periodicidade do QUALIS trazem uma inseguranca para os autores que tem nos periodicos o veiculo de divulgação de suas práticas e teorias. Queremos, assim, adensar a discussao com a comunidade cientifica e a Agencia Reguladora Governamental, sobre os destinos que estarao reservados aos Periodicos Científicos brasileiros.Fundação CesgranrioPonce, Branca JuremaSilva, Cicero Barbosa daSousa, Jose dos SantosAnjos, DanielaDias, Erika Simone de Almeida CarlosBerkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete MayAlmeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini deFreitas, Silvana AlvesPietri, Emerson dePrieto, Rosângela GavioliCamargo, EvaniBranco, Jordanna CasteloBizelli, Jose LuisSiman, Lana Mara de CastroMuzzeti, Luci ReginaReis, Magali dosMartins, EdnaBissoto, Maria LuisaCastro, Monica Rabelo deGimenes, NelsonGualtieri, ReginaSilva, RegisRibeiro, RicardoLemes, Sebastiao de Souza2017-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/165210.1590/s0104-40362017002501032Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 97 (2017): Revista Ensaio Out./Dez.; 1032-10441809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2porengspahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/751https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/752https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/753Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-27T16:08:34Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1652Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2018-02-27T16:08:34Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
Sobre la mejoria de la produccion y de la evaluacion de revistas cientificas en Brasil
Sobre a melhoria da produção e da avaliação de periodicos científicos no Brasil
title About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
spellingShingle About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
Ponce, Branca Jurema
processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES
editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES
proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES
title_short About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
title_full About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
title_fullStr About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
title_sort About the improvement of production and evaluation of scientific journals in Brazil
author Ponce, Branca Jurema
author_facet Ponce, Branca Jurema
Silva, Cicero Barbosa da
Sousa, Jose dos Santos
Anjos, Daniela
Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos
Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May
Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de
Freitas, Silvana Alves
Pietri, Emerson de
Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli
Camargo, Evani
Branco, Jordanna Castelo
Bizelli, Jose Luis
Siman, Lana Mara de Castro
Muzzeti, Luci Regina
Reis, Magali dos
Martins, Edna
Bissoto, Maria Luisa
Castro, Monica Rabelo de
Gimenes, Nelson
Gualtieri, Regina
Silva, Regis
Ribeiro, Ricardo
Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza
author_role author
author2 Silva, Cicero Barbosa da
Sousa, Jose dos Santos
Anjos, Daniela
Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos
Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May
Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de
Freitas, Silvana Alves
Pietri, Emerson de
Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli
Camargo, Evani
Branco, Jordanna Castelo
Bizelli, Jose Luis
Siman, Lana Mara de Castro
Muzzeti, Luci Regina
Reis, Magali dos
Martins, Edna
Bissoto, Maria Luisa
Castro, Monica Rabelo de
Gimenes, Nelson
Gualtieri, Regina
Silva, Regis
Ribeiro, Ricardo
Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ponce, Branca Jurema
Silva, Cicero Barbosa da
Sousa, Jose dos Santos
Anjos, Daniela
Dias, Erika Simone de Almeida Carlos
Berkenbrock-Rosito, Margarete May
Almeida, Maria Blizabeth Biaconcini de
Freitas, Silvana Alves
Pietri, Emerson de
Prieto, Rosângela Gavioli
Camargo, Evani
Branco, Jordanna Castelo
Bizelli, Jose Luis
Siman, Lana Mara de Castro
Muzzeti, Luci Regina
Reis, Magali dos
Martins, Edna
Bissoto, Maria Luisa
Castro, Monica Rabelo de
Gimenes, Nelson
Gualtieri, Regina
Silva, Regis
Ribeiro, Ricardo
Lemes, Sebastiao de Souza
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES
editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES
proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES
topic processo editorial; periodicos academicos; avaliação; Qualis; CAPES
editorial process; academics journals; evaluation; Qualis; CAPES
proceso editorial; periodicos academicos; evaluacion; Qualis; CAPES
description The document we presented is the result of the reflection of Editors of Scientific Journals connected to FEPAE Southeast and expresses concrete concerns about the material conditions for the realization of its work and about the evaluation criteria that have been used to qualify its journals. Cheaper budgets, dismantling of university structures that supported many academic journals and indicators which everytime complicate even more the operational procedures involved in editorial production, undermine the national journals. Lack of visibility about the evaluation procedures, absence of dialogue about results and questions connected to the Qualis frequency bring uncertainty for the authors who have in the journals a vehicle for sharing its practices and theories. This way we want to deepen the discussion with the scientific community and the Regulatory Governmental Agency - CAPES - about the destinations reserved to Brazilian Scientific Journals.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652
10.1590/s0104-40362017002501032
url https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s0104-40362017002501032
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
spa
language por
eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/751
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/752
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/1652/753
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv








dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 25, n. 97 (2017): Revista Ensaio Out./Dez.; 1032-1044
1809-4465
0104-4036
reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron:CESGRANRIO-2
instname_str Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron_str CESGRANRIO-2
institution CESGRANRIO-2
reponame_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br
_version_ 1754832034300166144