Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Título da fonte: | Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/511 |
Resumo: | Empowerment evaluation was adopted by Stanford University's School of Medicine to engage in curricular reform. It was also used to prepare for an accreditation site visit. Empowerment evaluation is a guided form of self-evaluation. It was selected because the principles and practices of empowerment evaluation resonated with the collaborative and participatory nature of the curricular reform in the School. This article highlights one of the most important features of an empowerment evaluation: a critical friend. This individual has evaluation expertise but serves as a coach, advisor, or guide, rather than "the expert". The evaluation is in the hands of the people in the program, but a critical friend helps to keep it on track and rigorous. As one indication of the importance of this role, student ratings on selected clerkship rotations, where a critical friend was requested to respond to student concerns, resulted in significant increases in student ratings. |
id |
CESGRANRIO_9dcb2e960c3980016356062b058135a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/511 |
network_acronym_str |
CESGRANRIO |
network_name_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experienceEvaluacion de Concesion Legal de Poder de la Escuela de medicina de la Universidad de Stanford: usando un amigo critico para mejorar la experiencia en la residenciaAvaliação da concessao legal de poder da escola de medicina da Universidade de Stanford: usando um amigo critico para melhorar a experiencia na residenciaConcesion legal de poder; Evaluacion; Evaluacion de concesion legal de poder; Amigo critico; Clasificacion de los alumnosEmpowerment; Evaluation; Empowerment evaluation; "Critical friend"; Student ratingsConcessao legal de poder; Avaliação; Avaliação de concessao legal de poder; "Amigo critico;" Classificação dos alunosEmpowerment evaluation was adopted by Stanford University's School of Medicine to engage in curricular reform. It was also used to prepare for an accreditation site visit. Empowerment evaluation is a guided form of self-evaluation. It was selected because the principles and practices of empowerment evaluation resonated with the collaborative and participatory nature of the curricular reform in the School. This article highlights one of the most important features of an empowerment evaluation: a critical friend. This individual has evaluation expertise but serves as a coach, advisor, or guide, rather than "the expert". The evaluation is in the hands of the people in the program, but a critical friend helps to keep it on track and rigorous. As one indication of the importance of this role, student ratings on selected clerkship rotations, where a critical friend was requested to respond to student concerns, resulted in significant increases in student ratings.La evaluacion de concesion legal de poder fue adoptada por la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Stanford para participar de la reforma curricular. Tambien fue usada para preparar un credenciamento en un site de visita. La evaluacion de concesion legal de poder es una forma guiada de autoevaluacion. Los principios y practicas de evaluacion legal de poder corresponden harmoniosamente a la naturaleza colaboradora y participativa de la reforma curricular en la escuela. Este artigo destaca una de las mas importantes caracteristicas de la evaluacion de concesion legal de poder: el amigo critico. Este individuo tiene experiencia en evaluacion, pero sirve como instructor, consejero y guia en lugar del "perito". La evaluacion esta en las manos de las personas del programa, pero el amigo critico ayuda a mantener el bueno camino y la precision. Como un indicador de la importancia de ese papel, las evaluaciones de los alumnos en las escalas de residencia seleccionadas, donde un amigo critico fue solicitado a responder a las preocupaciones de los alumnos, resulto en aumento significante en la clasificacion de los alumnos.A avaliação de concessao legal de poder foi adotada pela Escola de Medicina da Universidade de Stanford para participar da reforma curricular. Tambem foi usada para preparar um credenciamento em um site de visita. A avaliação de concessao legal de poder e uma forma guiada de autoavaliação. Ela foi selecionada, pois os principios e práticas de avaliação legal de poder correspondem harmoniosamente à natureza colaborativa e participativa da reforma curricular na escola. Este artigo destaca uma das mais importantes caracteristicas da avaliação de concessao legal de poder: o amigo critico. Este individuo possui experiencia em avaliação, porem serve como instrutor, conselheiro e guia em vez de "o perito". A avaliação esta nas maos das pessoas do programa, porem o amigo critico ajuda a manter o bom caminho e a rigorosidade. Como um indicador da importância desse papel, as avaliações dos alunos nas escalas de residencia selecionadas, onde um amigo critico foi solicitado para responder às preocupacoes dos alunos, resultou em um aumento significante na classificação dos alunos.Fundação CesgranrioFetterman, David2009-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/511Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 17, n. 63 (2009): Revista Ensaio - Abr./Jun.; 197-2041809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2pt; en; esDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-07-08T16:06:31Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/511Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2015-07-08T16:06:31Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience Evaluacion de Concesion Legal de Poder de la Escuela de medicina de la Universidad de Stanford: usando un amigo critico para mejorar la experiencia en la residencia Avaliação da concessao legal de poder da escola de medicina da Universidade de Stanford: usando um amigo critico para melhorar a experiencia na residencia |
title |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
spellingShingle |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience Fetterman, David Concesion legal de poder; Evaluacion; Evaluacion de concesion legal de poder; Amigo critico; Clasificacion de los alumnos Empowerment; Evaluation; Empowerment evaluation; "Critical friend"; Student ratings Concessao legal de poder; Avaliação; Avaliação de concessao legal de poder; "Amigo critico;" Classificação dos alunos |
title_short |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
title_full |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
title_fullStr |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
title_sort |
Empowerment evaluation at the Stanford University School of Medicine: using a critical friend to improve the clerkship experience |
author |
Fetterman, David |
author_facet |
Fetterman, David |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fetterman, David |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Concesion legal de poder; Evaluacion; Evaluacion de concesion legal de poder; Amigo critico; Clasificacion de los alumnos Empowerment; Evaluation; Empowerment evaluation; "Critical friend"; Student ratings Concessao legal de poder; Avaliação; Avaliação de concessao legal de poder; "Amigo critico;" Classificação dos alunos |
topic |
Concesion legal de poder; Evaluacion; Evaluacion de concesion legal de poder; Amigo critico; Clasificacion de los alumnos Empowerment; Evaluation; Empowerment evaluation; "Critical friend"; Student ratings Concessao legal de poder; Avaliação; Avaliação de concessao legal de poder; "Amigo critico;" Classificação dos alunos |
description |
Empowerment evaluation was adopted by Stanford University's School of Medicine to engage in curricular reform. It was also used to prepare for an accreditation site visit. Empowerment evaluation is a guided form of self-evaluation. It was selected because the principles and practices of empowerment evaluation resonated with the collaborative and participatory nature of the curricular reform in the School. This article highlights one of the most important features of an empowerment evaluation: a critical friend. This individual has evaluation expertise but serves as a coach, advisor, or guide, rather than "the expert". The evaluation is in the hands of the people in the program, but a critical friend helps to keep it on track and rigorous. As one indication of the importance of this role, student ratings on selected clerkship rotations, where a critical friend was requested to respond to student concerns, resulted in significant increases in student ratings. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-20 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/511 |
url |
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/511 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
language_invalid_str_mv |
pt; en; es |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 17, n. 63 (2009): Revista Ensaio - Abr./Jun.; 197-204 1809-4465 0104-4036 reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Fundação Cesgranrio instacron:CESGRANRIO-2 |
instname_str |
Fundação Cesgranrio |
instacron_str |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
institution |
CESGRANRIO-2 |
reponame_str |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br |
_version_ |
1754832031321161728 |