PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146 |
Resumo: | Objective: This article aims to analyze the risks of the culture of cancellation in the virtual environment to the right to freedom and personality rights, to identify how algorithms are used to predict users and the creation of virtual social bubbles with a discriminatory bias cancellation contributes.Methodology: It uses the hypothetical-deductive method, and starts from the hypothesis that virtual bubbles and echo chambers strengthen and expand cancellation discourses and that these discourses violate personality rights and human dignity, therefore, they cannot be considered as manifestations of citizenship and freedom of expression. As a research technique, it uses literature review in articles, books, physical and electronic, in national databases, and secondary sources such as documental analysis in newspapers and news.Results: Cancel culture is a practice that manifests itself in intolerance to opposing views, which is amplified by virtual social bubbles and echo chambers, and which affects life online and offline. The cancellation speech poses risks to personality rights and human dignity, and breaks with the notion of freedom. Public education policies for digital citizenship must be created, which encourage plurality and freedom of expression, without violating fundamental rights.Contributions: The contribution that is expected from the research is the relationship between the culture of cancellation in the face of virtual social bubbles, disinformation and algorithmic prediction and the risks that these phenomena pose to freedom and personality rights. |
id |
CHRISTUS-2_8d4917c666a3f9a661e675b76c3506c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4146 |
network_acronym_str |
CHRISTUS-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOMALGORITMOS PREDICTIVOS, BURBUJAS SOCIALES Y CÁMARAS ECO VIRTUALES EN LA CULTURA DE LA CANCELACIÓN Y LOS RIESGOS A LOS DERECHOS DE LA PERSONALIDAD Y LA LIBERTAD HUMANAALGORITMOS PREDITIVOS, BOLHAS SOCIAIS E CÂMARAS DE ECO VIRTUAIS NA CULTURA DO CANCELAMENTO E OS RISCOS AOS DIREITOS DE PERSONALIDADE E À LIBERDADE HUMANApersonality rightscancellation culturefreedomhuman dignityderechos de la personalidadecultura de cancelaciónlibertaddignidad humanadireitos de personalidadecultura do cancelamentoliberdadedignidade humanaObjective: This article aims to analyze the risks of the culture of cancellation in the virtual environment to the right to freedom and personality rights, to identify how algorithms are used to predict users and the creation of virtual social bubbles with a discriminatory bias cancellation contributes.Methodology: It uses the hypothetical-deductive method, and starts from the hypothesis that virtual bubbles and echo chambers strengthen and expand cancellation discourses and that these discourses violate personality rights and human dignity, therefore, they cannot be considered as manifestations of citizenship and freedom of expression. As a research technique, it uses literature review in articles, books, physical and electronic, in national databases, and secondary sources such as documental analysis in newspapers and news.Results: Cancel culture is a practice that manifests itself in intolerance to opposing views, which is amplified by virtual social bubbles and echo chambers, and which affects life online and offline. The cancellation speech poses risks to personality rights and human dignity, and breaks with the notion of freedom. Public education policies for digital citizenship must be created, which encourage plurality and freedom of expression, without violating fundamental rights.Contributions: The contribution that is expected from the research is the relationship between the culture of cancellation in the face of virtual social bubbles, disinformation and algorithmic prediction and the risks that these phenomena pose to freedom and personality rights.Objetivo: Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los riesgos de la cultura de la cancelación en el entorno virtual para el derecho a la libertad y los derechos de la personalidad, identificar cómo se utilizan los algoritmos para predecir usuarios y contribuye la creación de burbujas sociales virtuales con un sesgo discriminatorio de cancelación.Metodología: Utiliza el método hipotético-deductivo, y parte de la hipótesis de que las burbujas virtuales y las cámaras de eco fortalecen y expanden los discursos de cancelación y que estos discursos vulneran los derechos de la personalidad y la dignidad humana, por lo que no pueden ser considerados como manifestaciones de ciudadanía y libertad de expresión. Como técnica de investigación utiliza la revisión bibliográfica en artículos, libros, físicos y electrónicos, en bases de datos nacionales, y fuentes secundarias como el análisis documental en periódicos y noticias.Resultados: La cultura de cancelación es una práctica que se manifiesta en la intolerancia a puntos de vista opuestos, que se amplifica con burbujas sociales virtuales y cámaras de eco, y que afecta la vida en línea y fuera de línea. El discurso de cancelación plantea riesgos para los derechos de la personalidad y la dignidad humana, y rompe con la noción de libertad. Se deben crear políticas públicas de educación para la ciudadanía digital, que fomenten la pluralidad y la libertad de expresión, sin vulnerar los derechos fundamentales.Contribuciones: La aportación que se espera de la investigación es la relación entre la cultura de la cancelación frente a las burbujas sociales virtuales, la desinformación y la predicción algorítmica y los riesgos que estos fenómenos suponen para la libertad y los derechos de la personalidad.Objetivo: O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar os riscos da cultura do cancelamento no ambiente virtual ao direito à liberdade e aos direitos de personalidade, identificar de que forma a utilização de algoritmos para a predição dos usuários e a criação de bolhas sociais virtuais com viés discriminatório contribui o cancelamento.Metodologia: Utiliza o método hipotético-dedutivo e parte da hipótese de que as bolhas virtuais e câmaras de eco fortalecem e expandem discursos de cancelamento e esses discursos violam os direitos de personalidade e a dignidade humana, logo, não podem ser considerados como manifestações de cidadania e liberdade de expressão. Como técnica de investigação, utiliza a revisão bibliográfica em artigos, livros, físicos e eletrônicos, nas bases de dados nacionais e em fontes secundárias como a análise documental em jornais e notícias.Resultados: A cultura do cancelamento é uma prática que se manifesta na intolerância às visões opostas, que é amplificada pelas bolhas sociais virtuais pelas câmaras de eco, que atinge a vida online e offline. O discurso de cancelamento representa riscos aos direitos de personalidade e dignidade humana e rompe com a noção de liberdade. Deve-se criar políticas públicas de educação para a cidadania digital, que estimulem a pluralidade e a liberdade de expressão, sem a violação a direitos fundamentais.Contribuições: A contribuição que se espera com a pesquisa é a relação entre a cultura do cancelamento diante das bolhas sociais virtuais, da desinformação e da predição algorítmica e os riscos que esses fenômenos representam à liberdade e aos direitos de personalidade.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)2022-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de literaturaapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/414610.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p162-188.2022Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No. 35 (2022); 162-188Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 Núm. 35 (2022); 162-188Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No 35 (2022); 162-188Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20 n. 35 (2022); 162-1882447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.2022reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146/1623https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146/1636Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSiqueira, Dirceu PereiraVieira, Ana Elisa Silva Fernandes2023-01-30T13:15:49Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4146Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2023-01-30T13:15:49Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM ALGORITMOS PREDICTIVOS, BURBUJAS SOCIALES Y CÁMARAS ECO VIRTUALES EN LA CULTURA DE LA CANCELACIÓN Y LOS RIESGOS A LOS DERECHOS DE LA PERSONALIDAD Y LA LIBERTAD HUMANA ALGORITMOS PREDITIVOS, BOLHAS SOCIAIS E CÂMARAS DE ECO VIRTUAIS NA CULTURA DO CANCELAMENTO E OS RISCOS AOS DIREITOS DE PERSONALIDADE E À LIBERDADE HUMANA |
title |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
spellingShingle |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira personality rights cancellation culture freedom human dignity derechos de la personalidade cultura de cancelación libertad dignidad humana direitos de personalidade cultura do cancelamento liberdade dignidade humana |
title_short |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
title_full |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
title_fullStr |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
title_full_unstemmed |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
title_sort |
PREDICTIVE ALGORITHMS, SOCIAL BUBBLES AND VIRTUAL ECO CAMERAS IN THE CULTURE OF CANCELLATION AND THE RISKS TO PERSONALITY RIGHTS AND HUMAN FREEDOM |
author |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira |
author_facet |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira Vieira, Ana Elisa Silva Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Ana Elisa Silva Fernandes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siqueira, Dirceu Pereira Vieira, Ana Elisa Silva Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
personality rights cancellation culture freedom human dignity derechos de la personalidade cultura de cancelación libertad dignidad humana direitos de personalidade cultura do cancelamento liberdade dignidade humana |
topic |
personality rights cancellation culture freedom human dignity derechos de la personalidade cultura de cancelación libertad dignidad humana direitos de personalidade cultura do cancelamento liberdade dignidade humana |
description |
Objective: This article aims to analyze the risks of the culture of cancellation in the virtual environment to the right to freedom and personality rights, to identify how algorithms are used to predict users and the creation of virtual social bubbles with a discriminatory bias cancellation contributes.Methodology: It uses the hypothetical-deductive method, and starts from the hypothesis that virtual bubbles and echo chambers strengthen and expand cancellation discourses and that these discourses violate personality rights and human dignity, therefore, they cannot be considered as manifestations of citizenship and freedom of expression. As a research technique, it uses literature review in articles, books, physical and electronic, in national databases, and secondary sources such as documental analysis in newspapers and news.Results: Cancel culture is a practice that manifests itself in intolerance to opposing views, which is amplified by virtual social bubbles and echo chambers, and which affects life online and offline. The cancellation speech poses risks to personality rights and human dignity, and breaks with the notion of freedom. Public education policies for digital citizenship must be created, which encourage plurality and freedom of expression, without violating fundamental rights.Contributions: The contribution that is expected from the research is the relationship between the culture of cancellation in the face of virtual social bubbles, disinformation and algorithmic prediction and the risks that these phenomena pose to freedom and personality rights. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Revisão de literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p162-188.2022 |
url |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p162-188.2022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146/1623 https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4146/1636 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No. 35 (2022); 162-188 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 Núm. 35 (2022); 162-188 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No 35 (2022); 162-188 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20 n. 35 (2022); 162-188 2447-6641 1806-0420 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.2022 reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) instacron:UNICHRISTUS |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
instacron_str |
UNICHRISTUS |
institution |
UNICHRISTUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797052896067452928 |