STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTObjective: This article intends to address the new Brazilian regulatory environment created by the SOEs Law (Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016) which created new corporate governance rules in state-owned enterprises for the election of directors, officers and fiscal council members, with the purpose of protecting the public companies, the mixed joint-stock corporation and its subsidiaries ("state-owned") against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the SOEs. The article will also present cases of progress, setbacks, and the future of this new Brazilian legal norm.Methodology: Review of the bibliography and analysis of judicial and administrative precedents involving the application of new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises.Results: It is possible to conclude that the new corporate governance rules were created by Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 with the purpose of protecting the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of the top-level management positions in the SOEs.Contributions: From the results found, it is possible to verify: (a) One of the most relevant aspects of the Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 was the creation of academic background, professional experience and professionalization for the top-level management of state-owned enterprises, as usual in the private sector. (b) that the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) determined the application of the new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises; (c) the Judiciary, especially the Federal Supreme Court (STF), can make a relevant contribution if it decides to apply these new rules of governance corporate in order to mitigate political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the state-owned enterprises (SOEs). |
id |
CHRISTUS-2_9b337221bc30fe94f80143d2eea97438 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4294 |
network_acronym_str |
CHRISTUS-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULESEMPRESAS ESTATALES: 05 AÑOS DE LAS NUEVAS REGLAS DE GOBIERNO CORPORATIVOcompanystate-owned enterprisescorporate governancedirectors and officerslegal requirements and impedimentsempresaestatalesgobierno corporativoadministradoresrequisitos e impedimentos legalesABSTRACTObjective: This article intends to address the new Brazilian regulatory environment created by the SOEs Law (Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016) which created new corporate governance rules in state-owned enterprises for the election of directors, officers and fiscal council members, with the purpose of protecting the public companies, the mixed joint-stock corporation and its subsidiaries ("state-owned") against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the SOEs. The article will also present cases of progress, setbacks, and the future of this new Brazilian legal norm.Methodology: Review of the bibliography and analysis of judicial and administrative precedents involving the application of new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises.Results: It is possible to conclude that the new corporate governance rules were created by Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 with the purpose of protecting the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of the top-level management positions in the SOEs.Contributions: From the results found, it is possible to verify: (a) One of the most relevant aspects of the Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 was the creation of academic background, professional experience and professionalization for the top-level management of state-owned enterprises, as usual in the private sector. (b) that the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) determined the application of the new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises; (c) the Judiciary, especially the Federal Supreme Court (STF), can make a relevant contribution if it decides to apply these new rules of governance corporate in order to mitigate political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the state-owned enterprises (SOEs).Objetivo: Este artículo pretende abordar el nuevo entorno regulatorio brasileño creado por la Ley de las Estatales (Ley nº 13.303, de 30 de junio de 2016) que creó nuevas reglas de gobierno corporativo en las empresas estatales para la elección de miembros de la junta directiva, del directorio y del consejo de vigilancia, también conocido como inspectores de cuentas, con el objeto de proteger a la empresa pública, a la empresa de capital mixto y a sus subsidiarias (“empresas estatales”) contra posibles (y lamentablemente comunes) injerencias políticas partidarias en la designación de los integrantes de estos cargos directivos de las empresas estatales. El texto también presentará casos de avances, retrocesos y el futuro de este nuevo diploma jurídico brasileño.Metodologia: Revisión de la bibliografía y análisis de precedentes judiciales y administrativos relacionados con la aplicación de nuevas reglas de gobierno corporativo para las empresas estatales.Resultados: Es posible concluir que las nuevas reglas de gobierno corporativo fueron creadas por la Ley nº 13.303, de 30 de junio de 2016, con el objetivo de proteger a las empresas estatales contra posibles (y lamentablemente comunes) injerencias de los partidos políticos en la designación de miembros de los cargos directivos.Contribuciones: De los resultados encontrados, es posible verificar: (a) Uno de los aspectos más relevantes de la Ley N° 13.303, de 30 de junio de 2016, fue la creación de experiencia académica, experiencia profesional y profesionalización para cargos en la administración de empresas estatales, como es costumbre en el sector privado. (b) que la Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CVM) determinó la aplicación de las nuevas reglas de gobierno corporativo para las empresas estatales; (c) el Poder Judicial, especialmente el Supremo Tribunal Federal, puede hacer una contribución relevante si decide aplicar estas nuevas reglas de gobierno corporativo, a fin de mitigar la injerencia de los partidos políticos en la designación de miembros de los cargos directivos de las empresas estatales .Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)2023-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionartigoapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/429410.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p1-17.2023Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No. 38 (2023); 1-17Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 Núm. 38 (2023); 1-17Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No 38 (2023); 1-17Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 21 n. 38 (2023); 1-172447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.2023reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSenghttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294/1786https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294/1803Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia, Ricardo Lupion2024-02-06T18:16:45Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4294Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2024-02-06T18:16:45Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES EMPRESAS ESTATALES: 05 AÑOS DE LAS NUEVAS REGLAS DE GOBIERNO CORPORATIVO |
title |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
spellingShingle |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES Garcia, Ricardo Lupion company state-owned enterprises corporate governance directors and officers legal requirements and impediments empresa estatales gobierno corporativo administradores requisitos e impedimentos legales |
title_short |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
title_full |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
title_fullStr |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
title_full_unstemmed |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
title_sort |
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES: 05 YEARS OF THE NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RULES |
author |
Garcia, Ricardo Lupion |
author_facet |
Garcia, Ricardo Lupion |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Ricardo Lupion |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
company state-owned enterprises corporate governance directors and officers legal requirements and impediments empresa estatales gobierno corporativo administradores requisitos e impedimentos legales |
topic |
company state-owned enterprises corporate governance directors and officers legal requirements and impediments empresa estatales gobierno corporativo administradores requisitos e impedimentos legales |
description |
ABSTRACTObjective: This article intends to address the new Brazilian regulatory environment created by the SOEs Law (Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016) which created new corporate governance rules in state-owned enterprises for the election of directors, officers and fiscal council members, with the purpose of protecting the public companies, the mixed joint-stock corporation and its subsidiaries ("state-owned") against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the SOEs. The article will also present cases of progress, setbacks, and the future of this new Brazilian legal norm.Methodology: Review of the bibliography and analysis of judicial and administrative precedents involving the application of new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises.Results: It is possible to conclude that the new corporate governance rules were created by Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 with the purpose of protecting the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) against any possible (and unfortunately common) political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of the top-level management positions in the SOEs.Contributions: From the results found, it is possible to verify: (a) One of the most relevant aspects of the Law No. 13,303, of June 30, 2016 was the creation of academic background, professional experience and professionalization for the top-level management of state-owned enterprises, as usual in the private sector. (b) that the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) determined the application of the new corporate governance rules for state-owned enterprises; (c) the Judiciary, especially the Federal Supreme Court (STF), can make a relevant contribution if it decides to apply these new rules of governance corporate in order to mitigate political-partisan interference in the appointment of the members of these top-level management positions in the state-owned enterprises (SOEs). |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artigo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p1-17.2023 |
url |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p1-17.2023 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294/1786 https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4294/1803 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No. 38 (2023); 1-17 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 Núm. 38 (2023); 1-17 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No 38 (2023); 1-17 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 21 n. 38 (2023); 1-17 2447-6641 1806-0420 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.2023 reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) instacron:UNICHRISTUS |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
instacron_str |
UNICHRISTUS |
institution |
UNICHRISTUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797052896088424448 |