BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tobbin, Raissa Arantes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072
Resumo: Background: In postmodernity it is fundamental to question whether the improvement of the body, with the science and technology (through biotechnology, nanotechnology) would be a human and personality right, especially if the body with technological applications, the proteic body and the cyborg could receive the protection of the personality rights, based on dignity, a concept that is reasoned on human ideals.Objective: This article aims to analyze thecniques as the biohacking and the cyborguism as a possibility for human improvement in the light of personality rights, especially the human dignity.Method: The research used the hypothetical-deductive method, based on research and bibliographic review of books, articles from periods, legislation and doctrine applicable to the subject of the article.Results: As a result, it was found that the improvement of the body with the help of technology is a human and personality right, especially in the face of chronic diseases and conditions that cause pain and suffering and that can be avoided with applications based on the post-human body, in the protean body and in cyborgism, concepts that also deserve protection by the personality rights. However, it is essential that this discussion is permeated by bioethical and legal implications involving eugenic practices and discrimination and domination, considering the possibility of reification of the human being, of the serviceability of the body and mind in front of the machine.
id CHRISTUS-2_b3e8ea96ed3244c6f30eeab134adb771
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4072
network_acronym_str CHRISTUS-2
network_name_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository_id_str
spelling BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTSBIOHACKING Y CIBORGUISMO: LA MEJORA HUMANA A LA LUZ DE LOS DERECHOS DA PERSONALIDADBIOHACKING E CIBORGUISMO: O MELHORAMENTO HUMANO À LUZ DOS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADEcyborgpersonality rightsartificial intelligencecyborgderechos de la personalidadinteligencia artificialciborguedireitos da personalidadeinteligência artificialBackground: In postmodernity it is fundamental to question whether the improvement of the body, with the science and technology (through biotechnology, nanotechnology) would be a human and personality right, especially if the body with technological applications, the proteic body and the cyborg could receive the protection of the personality rights, based on dignity, a concept that is reasoned on human ideals.Objective: This article aims to analyze thecniques as the biohacking and the cyborguism as a possibility for human improvement in the light of personality rights, especially the human dignity.Method: The research used the hypothetical-deductive method, based on research and bibliographic review of books, articles from periods, legislation and doctrine applicable to the subject of the article.Results: As a result, it was found that the improvement of the body with the help of technology is a human and personality right, especially in the face of chronic diseases and conditions that cause pain and suffering and that can be avoided with applications based on the post-human body, in the protean body and in cyborgism, concepts that also deserve protection by the personality rights. However, it is essential that this discussion is permeated by bioethical and legal implications involving eugenic practices and discrimination and domination, considering the possibility of reification of the human being, of the serviceability of the body and mind in front of the machine.Contextualización: Em la posmodernidad es fundamental cuestionar si la mejora del corpo, com la ayuda de la ciência y la tecnologia (através de la biotecnologia, la nanotecnologia y la neurotecnología) sería um derecho humano y de la personalidad, especialmente si el cuerpo con aplicaciones tecnológicas, el cuerpo proteico y el cyborg podrían recibir protección por los derechos de la personalidad, basados em la dignidad, un concepto basado en ideales humanos.Objetivo: Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar técnicas como el biohacking e el ciborgismo como posibilidad de mejora humana a la luz de los derechos de la personalidad, especialmente la dignidad humana.Método: La investigación utilizó el método hipotético-deductivo, basado en la investigación y revisión bibliográfica de trabajos, artículos de época, legislación y doctrina aplicable a la temática del artículo.Resultados: La mejora del cuerpo con la ayuda de la tecnología es un derecho humano y de la personalidad, especialmente frente a enfermedades y afecciones crónicas que causan dolor y sufrimiento y que pueden evitarse con aplicaciones basadas en el cuerpo post-humano, en el cuerpo proteico y en el ciborgismo, conceptos que también merecen una protección muy personal. Sin embargo, es fundamental que esta discusión esté permeada por implicaciones bioéticas y legales que involucran prácticas eugenésicas y discriminación y dominación, considerando la posibilidad de cosificación del ser humano, de la utilidad del cuerpo y la mente humanos frente a la máquina.Contextualização: Na pós-modernidade, é fundamental questionar se o aperfeiçoamento do corpo, com o auxílio da ciência e da tecnologia (por meio da biotecnologia, da nanotecnologia e neurotecnologia), seria um direito humano e da personalidade, sobretudo se o corpo com aplicações tecnológicas, o corpo proteico e o ciborgue poderiam receber proteção personalíssima, fundamentada na dignidade, conceito que tem por base ideais humanos.Objetivo: O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar técnicas como o biohacking e o ciborguismo como possibilidade de melhoramento humano à luz dos direitos da personalidade, especialmente sob o prisma da dignidade da pessoa humana.Metodologia: A pesquisa utilizou o método hipotético-dedutivo, fundamentado em pesquisa e revisão bibliográfica de obras, artigos de períodos, legislação e doutrina aplicável à temática do artigo.Resultados: O aperfeiçoamento do corpo com o auxílio da tecnologia é um direito humano e da personalidade, sobretudo diante de enfermidades e condições crônicas que causam dor e sofrimento e que podem ser evitadas com aplicações fundamentadas no corpo pós-humano, no corpo proteico e no ciborguismo, conceitos que também merecem proteção personalíssima. Contudo, é fundamental que esta discussão seja permeada pelas implicações bioéticas e jurídicas que envolvem práticas eugênicas e de discriminação e dominação, tendo em vista a possibilidade de coisificação do ser humano, de servibilidade do corpo e da mente humana diante da máquina.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)2022-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/407210.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p110-138.2022Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No. 35 (2022); 110-138Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 Núm. 35 (2022); 110-138Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No 35 (2022); 110-138Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20 n. 35 (2022); 110-1382447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.2022reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072/1618https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072/1624Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTobbin, Raissa ArantesCardin, Valéria Silva Galdino2023-01-30T13:15:49Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4072Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2023-01-30T13:15:49Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
BIOHACKING Y CIBORGUISMO: LA MEJORA HUMANA A LA LUZ DE LOS DERECHOS DA PERSONALIDAD
BIOHACKING E CIBORGUISMO: O MELHORAMENTO HUMANO À LUZ DOS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE
title BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
spellingShingle BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
Tobbin, Raissa Arantes
cyborg
personality rights
artificial intelligence
cyborg
derechos de la personalidad
inteligencia artificial
ciborgue
direitos da personalidade
inteligência artificial
title_short BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
title_full BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
title_fullStr BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
title_full_unstemmed BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
title_sort BIOHACKING AND CIBORGUISM: HUMAN IMPROVEMENT IN LIGHT OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS
author Tobbin, Raissa Arantes
author_facet Tobbin, Raissa Arantes
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
author_role author
author2 Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tobbin, Raissa Arantes
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cyborg
personality rights
artificial intelligence
cyborg
derechos de la personalidad
inteligencia artificial
ciborgue
direitos da personalidade
inteligência artificial
topic cyborg
personality rights
artificial intelligence
cyborg
derechos de la personalidad
inteligencia artificial
ciborgue
direitos da personalidade
inteligência artificial
description Background: In postmodernity it is fundamental to question whether the improvement of the body, with the science and technology (through biotechnology, nanotechnology) would be a human and personality right, especially if the body with technological applications, the proteic body and the cyborg could receive the protection of the personality rights, based on dignity, a concept that is reasoned on human ideals.Objective: This article aims to analyze thecniques as the biohacking and the cyborguism as a possibility for human improvement in the light of personality rights, especially the human dignity.Method: The research used the hypothetical-deductive method, based on research and bibliographic review of books, articles from periods, legislation and doctrine applicable to the subject of the article.Results: As a result, it was found that the improvement of the body with the help of technology is a human and personality right, especially in the face of chronic diseases and conditions that cause pain and suffering and that can be avoided with applications based on the post-human body, in the protean body and in cyborgism, concepts that also deserve protection by the personality rights. However, it is essential that this discussion is permeated by bioethical and legal implications involving eugenic practices and discrimination and domination, considering the possibility of reification of the human being, of the serviceability of the body and mind in front of the machine.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p110-138.2022
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072
identifier_str_mv 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.p110-138.2022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072/1618
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4072/1624
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No. 35 (2022); 110-138
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 Núm. 35 (2022); 110-138
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 20 No 35 (2022); 110-138
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20 n. 35 (2022); 110-138
2447-6641
1806-0420
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i35.2022
reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron:UNICHRISTUS
instname_str Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron_str UNICHRISTUS
institution UNICHRISTUS
reponame_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
collection Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1797052896064307200