FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424 |
Resumo: | Objective: It was possible to demonstrate that, contrary to what is often stated, the theme Law and Literature does not begin to be studied in the United States with the publication of The Legal Imagination (1973). We seek to demonstrate which epistemological paradigms were in force in certain periods in the American academies, responsible for allowing the approximations and distances between the two areas. We seek to problematize why some American authors are mentioned more frequently than others.Methodology: We started with a literature review of texts written in English and empirical documentary analyzes from different sources such as books, articles, essays and texts published on websites.Results: It was possible to identify the relations of law and literature in the beginning of the American republic, important for the construction of the national identity of that country; the emergence of logical positivism as a possible justification for the split between the two areas; and the permanence of authors who, before 1973, continued to write, with originality, on this interdisciplinary endeavor.Contributions: Issues were raised about the forgetfulness of certain authors in the field, which helps to understand the historicity of law and literature, in particular, and the legal epistemology in general. |
id |
CHRISTUS-2_ddb8b1459827aefac7f3af5209994286 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/3424 |
network_acronym_str |
CHRISTUS-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGYPRECURSORES OLVIDADOS DE DERECHO Y LITERATURA EN ESTADOS UNIDOS: LA HISTORICIDAD DE LOS PARADIGMAS DE EPISTEMOLOGÍA JURÍDICAPRECURSORES ESQUECIDOS DO DIREITO E LITERATURA NOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: A HISTORICIDADE DOS PARADIGMAS DA EPISTEMOLOGIA JURÍDICALaw and literature; Historicity; Legal EpistemologyDerecho y literatura; Historicidad; Epistemología jurídicaDireito e literatura; Historicidade; Epistemologia JurídicaObjective: It was possible to demonstrate that, contrary to what is often stated, the theme Law and Literature does not begin to be studied in the United States with the publication of The Legal Imagination (1973). We seek to demonstrate which epistemological paradigms were in force in certain periods in the American academies, responsible for allowing the approximations and distances between the two areas. We seek to problematize why some American authors are mentioned more frequently than others.Methodology: We started with a literature review of texts written in English and empirical documentary analyzes from different sources such as books, articles, essays and texts published on websites.Results: It was possible to identify the relations of law and literature in the beginning of the American republic, important for the construction of the national identity of that country; the emergence of logical positivism as a possible justification for the split between the two areas; and the permanence of authors who, before 1973, continued to write, with originality, on this interdisciplinary endeavor.Contributions: Issues were raised about the forgetfulness of certain authors in the field, which helps to understand the historicity of law and literature, in particular, and the legal epistemology in general.Objetivo: No logró demostrar que, contrariamente a lo que se suele afirmar, el tema Derecho y Literatura no comienza a estudiarse en Estados Unidos con la publicación de The Legal Imagination (1973). Intentamos demostrar qué paradigmas epistemológicos estaban vigentes en determinados periodos en las academias americanas, responsables de permitir las aproximaciones y distancias entre las dos áreas. Intentamos problematizar por qué algunos autores estadounidenses se mencionan con más frecuencia que otros.Metodología: Comenzamos con una revisión bibliográfica de textos escritos en inglés y análisis documental empírico de diferentes fuentes como libros, artículos, ensayos y textos publicados en sitios web.Resultados: se logró identificar las relaciones del derecho y la literatura en los inicios de la república americana, importantes para la construcción de la identidad nacional de ese país; la aparición del positivismo lógico como posible justificación de la división entre los dos ámbitos; y la permanencia de autores que, antes del hito inicial de 1973, continuaron escribiendo, con originalidad, sobre este empeño interdisciplinario.Contribuciones: Se plantearon cuestiones sobre el olvido de ciertos autores en el campo, lo que ayuda a comprender la historicidad del derecho y la literatura, en particular, y la epistemología jurídica en general.Objetivo: Buscou-se demonstrar que, ao contrário do que frequentemente se afirma, o tema Direito e Literatura não começa a ser estudado nos Estados Unidos com a publicação de The Legal Imagination(em 1973). Procurou-se demonstrar quais os paradigmas epistemológicos vigentes em determinados períodos nas academias estadunidenses, responsáveis por permitir as aproximações e os distanciamentos entre as duas áreas. Buscou-se problematizar porque alguns autores estadunidenses são mencionados de forma mais recorrentes que outros.Metodologia: Partiu-se de uma revisão de literatura de textos escritos em língua inglesa e de análises empíricas documentais de diferentes fontes, como livros, artigos, ensaios e textos publicados em sites. Resultados: Foi possível identificar as relações de direito e literatura no início da república estadunidense, importantes para a construção da identidade nacional daquele país; a emergência do positivismo lógico como uma possível justificativa para a cisão entre as duas áreas; e a permanência de autores que, antes do marco inicial de 1973, continuaram a escrever, com origininalidade, sobre esta empreitada interdisciplinar. Contribuições: Levantaram-se problematizações a respeito do esquecimento de determinados autores e autoras da área, o que auxilia na compreensão da historicidade do direito e da literatura, em específico, e da própria epistemologia jurídica, em geral. Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)CAPESOliveira, Amanda Muniz2021-05-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/342410.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i31.p75-95.2021Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-952447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i31.2021reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424/1400https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424/1374Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-07-20T13:15:50Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/3424Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2021-07-20T13:15:50Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY PRECURSORES OLVIDADOS DE DERECHO Y LITERATURA EN ESTADOS UNIDOS: LA HISTORICIDAD DE LOS PARADIGMAS DE EPISTEMOLOGÍA JURÍDICA PRECURSORES ESQUECIDOS DO DIREITO E LITERATURA NOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: A HISTORICIDADE DOS PARADIGMAS DA EPISTEMOLOGIA JURÍDICA |
title |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
spellingShingle |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY Oliveira, Amanda Muniz Law and literature; Historicity; Legal Epistemology Derecho y literatura; Historicidad; Epistemología jurídica Direito e literatura; Historicidade; Epistemologia Jurídica |
title_short |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_full |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_fullStr |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_full_unstemmed |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_sort |
FORGOTTEN PRECURSORS OF LAW AND LITERATURE IN THE UNITED STATES: THE HISTORICITY OF THE PARADIGMS OF LEGAL EPISTEMOLOGY |
author |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CAPES |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law and literature; Historicity; Legal Epistemology Derecho y literatura; Historicidad; Epistemología jurídica Direito e literatura; Historicidade; Epistemologia Jurídica |
topic |
Law and literature; Historicity; Legal Epistemology Derecho y literatura; Historicidad; Epistemología jurídica Direito e literatura; Historicidade; Epistemologia Jurídica |
description |
Objective: It was possible to demonstrate that, contrary to what is often stated, the theme Law and Literature does not begin to be studied in the United States with the publication of The Legal Imagination (1973). We seek to demonstrate which epistemological paradigms were in force in certain periods in the American academies, responsible for allowing the approximations and distances between the two areas. We seek to problematize why some American authors are mentioned more frequently than others.Methodology: We started with a literature review of texts written in English and empirical documentary analyzes from different sources such as books, articles, essays and texts published on websites.Results: It was possible to identify the relations of law and literature in the beginning of the American republic, important for the construction of the national identity of that country; the emergence of logical positivism as a possible justification for the split between the two areas; and the permanence of authors who, before 1973, continued to write, with originality, on this interdisciplinary endeavor.Contributions: Issues were raised about the forgetfulness of certain authors in the field, which helps to understand the historicity of law and literature, in particular, and the legal epistemology in general. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i31.p75-95.2021 |
url |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i31.p75-95.2021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424/1400 https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/3424/1374 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 19, n. 31 (2021); 75-95 2447-6641 1806-0420 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v19i31.2021 reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) instacron:UNICHRISTUS |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
instacron_str |
UNICHRISTUS |
institution |
UNICHRISTUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797052896742735872 |