A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/390 |
Resumo: | In the current context of crisis arising the jurisdiction of procedural burdens plaguing the Brazilian judiciary system, alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution, notably conciliation, mediation and arbitration, are presented, by the agencies that administer justice, as the possibility of positively handling the crisis mentioned above. However, the use of these mechanisms within the Brazilian justice system reality should be handled with caution, according to the particularities of each specific Law area. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that, considering individual pension lawsuits, the use of mediation still has a rather narrow margin of efficiency, due to the objective and subjective contours of these kinds of deals as well as the injunctions imposed by the factor of "procedural delay". In the collective and preventive level, however, the use of the Mediation Institute can be very useful as a tool for structural conflict resolution. |
id |
CONPEDI-11_b7ac7e1b3489117d01eb91e44c4fdc04 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/390 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-11 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension LawsuitsUm Novo Olhar Acerca do Instituto de Mediação em Processos Previdenciários de Natureza ColetivaMediation, Pension law suits, Objective conditioners, Subjective conditioners, Procedural delayMediação, Processo previdenciário, Condicionantes objetivas, Condicionantes subjetivas, Demora processualIn the current context of crisis arising the jurisdiction of procedural burdens plaguing the Brazilian judiciary system, alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution, notably conciliation, mediation and arbitration, are presented, by the agencies that administer justice, as the possibility of positively handling the crisis mentioned above. However, the use of these mechanisms within the Brazilian justice system reality should be handled with caution, according to the particularities of each specific Law area. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that, considering individual pension lawsuits, the use of mediation still has a rather narrow margin of efficiency, due to the objective and subjective contours of these kinds of deals as well as the injunctions imposed by the factor of "procedural delay". In the collective and preventive level, however, the use of the Mediation Institute can be very useful as a tool for structural conflict resolution.No atual contexto de crise da jurisdição decorrente da sobrecarga de processos que assola o Judiciário brasileiro, os mecanismos alternativos de solução de conflito, notadamente a mediação, a conciliação e a arbitragem, são apresentados, pelos órgãos de administração da Justiça, como uma das possibilidades de enfrentamento no que tange a referida crise. Todavia, a utilização desses mecanismos na realidade brasileira deve se dar com cautela, contemplando as especificidades de cada seara do Direito. O objetivo desse artigo é demonstrar que, nos processos judiciais previdenciários individuais, o uso da mediação tem uma margem de eficácia ainda bastante restrita, por força dos contornos objetivos e subjetivos dessa espécie de lide e das injunções impostas pelo fator mora processual. No âmbito coletivo e preventivo, no entanto, é possível avaliar, a partir da análise de casos concretos, que o uso do instituto da mediação evidencia grande utilidade como instrumento de resolução estrutural de conflitos.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISauaia, Artenira da Silva e SilvaDamasceno, Gioliano Antunes2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/39010.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.390Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015); 19-352525-96792525-9679reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitosinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/390/392Direitos autorais 2016 Artenira da Silva e Silva Sauaia, Gioliano Antunes Damascenohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-21T04:37:15Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/390Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/indexONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96792525-9679opendoar:2018-02-21T04:37:15Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits Um Novo Olhar Acerca do Instituto de Mediação em Processos Previdenciários de Natureza Coletiva |
title |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
spellingShingle |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits Sauaia, Artenira da Silva e Silva Mediation, Pension law suits, Objective conditioners, Subjective conditioners, Procedural delay Mediação, Processo previdenciário, Condicionantes objetivas, Condicionantes subjetivas, Demora processual |
title_short |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
title_full |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
title_fullStr |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
title_full_unstemmed |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
title_sort |
A New Approach of the Mediation Institute in Colective Pension Lawsuits |
author |
Sauaia, Artenira da Silva e Silva |
author_facet |
Sauaia, Artenira da Silva e Silva Damasceno, Gioliano Antunes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damasceno, Gioliano Antunes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sauaia, Artenira da Silva e Silva Damasceno, Gioliano Antunes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mediation, Pension law suits, Objective conditioners, Subjective conditioners, Procedural delay Mediação, Processo previdenciário, Condicionantes objetivas, Condicionantes subjetivas, Demora processual |
topic |
Mediation, Pension law suits, Objective conditioners, Subjective conditioners, Procedural delay Mediação, Processo previdenciário, Condicionantes objetivas, Condicionantes subjetivas, Demora processual |
description |
In the current context of crisis arising the jurisdiction of procedural burdens plaguing the Brazilian judiciary system, alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution, notably conciliation, mediation and arbitration, are presented, by the agencies that administer justice, as the possibility of positively handling the crisis mentioned above. However, the use of these mechanisms within the Brazilian justice system reality should be handled with caution, according to the particularities of each specific Law area. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that, considering individual pension lawsuits, the use of mediation still has a rather narrow margin of efficiency, due to the objective and subjective contours of these kinds of deals as well as the injunctions imposed by the factor of "procedural delay". In the collective and preventive level, however, the use of the Mediation Institute can be very useful as a tool for structural conflict resolution. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/390 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.390 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/390 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.390 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/390/392 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Artenira da Silva e Silva Sauaia, Gioliano Antunes Damasceno http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Artenira da Silva e Silva Sauaia, Gioliano Antunes Damasceno http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015); 19-35 2525-9679 2525-9679 reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
collection |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1808858138848264192 |