How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Rover, Aires Jose
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/254
Resumo: The computing era opens new democratic possibilities and urges: there is an ongoing tension in the frontier between government and society, the least demanding for more access to public information. Brazilian Judiciary Power stands out with project Justice in Numbers and the publishing of evaluation of goals for the people annually. However, it must be noticed: data gathering doesnt mean more information. The way to organize data as elements is what creates information. This organization, the way it happens and the data collected to make it are essential in the process of producing information about Judiciary Power. Within this framework, this paper investigates the problem: in a systems perspective, what are the shortcomings in gathering and treating data of Justice in Numbers report, taking in account its commitment to satisfy the demand for qualified information which pervades access culture, enabling identification of deficits and solutions to accomplish the social goal of Judiciary Power? The approach is by hypothetical-deductive method, the paper being divided in three sections: opens with an application of Systems Theory of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to the context of Democratic State, recognizing Judiciary Power as component of the state system, formed by relations of communication and cognition; this input is used for a critical analysis of data and measurers of Justice in Numbers in its role of base to producing the information which supports the managing of Brazilian Judiciary Power. At the end, it is indicated a sample of more systemic possibilities for working with data and measurers in judicial system.
id CONPEDI-12_728c2c6de8551c4ea03d63035d994f08
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/254
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-12
network_name_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository_id_str
spelling How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to InformationComo uma Perspectiva Sistêmica Pode Ajudar a Organizar Dados do Poder Judiciário na Cultura do Acesso à InformaçãoAccess culture; Complexity; Informatics; Judicial politics; Systems theoryCultura do acesso; Complexidade; Informática; Política judiciária; Teoria sistêmicaThe computing era opens new democratic possibilities and urges: there is an ongoing tension in the frontier between government and society, the least demanding for more access to public information. Brazilian Judiciary Power stands out with project Justice in Numbers and the publishing of evaluation of goals for the people annually. However, it must be noticed: data gathering doesnt mean more information. The way to organize data as elements is what creates information. This organization, the way it happens and the data collected to make it are essential in the process of producing information about Judiciary Power. Within this framework, this paper investigates the problem: in a systems perspective, what are the shortcomings in gathering and treating data of Justice in Numbers report, taking in account its commitment to satisfy the demand for qualified information which pervades access culture, enabling identification of deficits and solutions to accomplish the social goal of Judiciary Power? The approach is by hypothetical-deductive method, the paper being divided in three sections: opens with an application of Systems Theory of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to the context of Democratic State, recognizing Judiciary Power as component of the state system, formed by relations of communication and cognition; this input is used for a critical analysis of data and measurers of Justice in Numbers in its role of base to producing the information which supports the managing of Brazilian Judiciary Power. At the end, it is indicated a sample of more systemic possibilities for working with data and measurers in judicial system.A era informática abre novas possibilidades e anseios democráticos: há uma crescente tensão na fronteira entre governo e sociedade civil, essa demandando por maior acesso à informação pública. O Poder Judiciário brasileiro desponta com o projeto Justiça em Números e metas cuja avaliação é divulgada para a população anualmente. Porém, é preciso lembrar: acúmulo de  dados  não  significa  mais  informação.  A  maneira  de  organizar  os  dados  enquanto elementos que cria a informação. Essa organização, a maneira como se dá e os dados que são coletados para fazê-la são fundamentais no processo de elaboração de informações acerca do Poder Judiciário. Nesse contexto, o presente trabalho investiga a problemática: em uma perspectiva sistêmica, quais os déficits na coleta e tratamento de dados do relatório Justiça em  Números,  considerando  que  este  se  propõe  a  atender  à  demanda  por  informação qualificada que permeia a cultura do acesso, permitindo identificar déficits e soluções para efetivar a finalidade social do Poder Judiciário? A abordagem é pelo método hipotético- dedutivo, dividindo-se o trabalho em três seções: parte-se da teoria sistêmica desenvolvida por Humberto Maturana e Francisco Varela aplicada ao contexto do Estado democrático, reconhecendo o Poder Judiciário enquanto elemento do sistema estatal, formado por relações de comunicação e cognição; a construção é aporte para análise crítica dos indicadores e dados do relatório Justiça em Números no papel de base para produção da informação que sustenta a gestão do Judiciário brasileiro. Aponta-se ao final amostras de possibilidades mais sistêmicas para o trabalho com dados e indicadores no sistema judicial.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIKurtz, Lahis PasqualiRover, Aires Jose2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/25410.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.254Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 252-2752525-98222525-9822reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/254/255Direitos autorais 2016 Lahis Pasquali Kurtz, Aires Jose Roverhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-01T19:30:55Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/254Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciariaPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98222525-9822opendoar:2017-03-01T19:30:55Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
Como uma Perspectiva Sistêmica Pode Ajudar a Organizar Dados do Poder Judiciário na Cultura do Acesso à Informação
title How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
spellingShingle How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Access culture; Complexity; Informatics; Judicial politics; Systems theory
Cultura do acesso; Complexidade; Informática; Política judiciária; Teoria sistêmica
title_short How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
title_full How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
title_fullStr How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
title_full_unstemmed How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
title_sort How a Systems Perspective Can Help Organizing Data of Judiciary Power in the Culture of Access to Information
author Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
author_facet Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Rover, Aires Jose
author_role author
author2 Rover, Aires Jose
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Rover, Aires Jose
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Access culture; Complexity; Informatics; Judicial politics; Systems theory
Cultura do acesso; Complexidade; Informática; Política judiciária; Teoria sistêmica
topic Access culture; Complexity; Informatics; Judicial politics; Systems theory
Cultura do acesso; Complexidade; Informática; Política judiciária; Teoria sistêmica
description The computing era opens new democratic possibilities and urges: there is an ongoing tension in the frontier between government and society, the least demanding for more access to public information. Brazilian Judiciary Power stands out with project Justice in Numbers and the publishing of evaluation of goals for the people annually. However, it must be noticed: data gathering doesnt mean more information. The way to organize data as elements is what creates information. This organization, the way it happens and the data collected to make it are essential in the process of producing information about Judiciary Power. Within this framework, this paper investigates the problem: in a systems perspective, what are the shortcomings in gathering and treating data of Justice in Numbers report, taking in account its commitment to satisfy the demand for qualified information which pervades access culture, enabling identification of deficits and solutions to accomplish the social goal of Judiciary Power? The approach is by hypothetical-deductive method, the paper being divided in three sections: opens with an application of Systems Theory of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to the context of Democratic State, recognizing Judiciary Power as component of the state system, formed by relations of communication and cognition; this input is used for a critical analysis of data and measurers of Justice in Numbers in its role of base to producing the information which supports the managing of Brazilian Judiciary Power. At the end, it is indicated a sample of more systemic possibilities for working with data and measurers in judicial system.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/254
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.254
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/254
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.254
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/254/255
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Lahis Pasquali Kurtz, Aires Jose Rover
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Lahis Pasquali Kurtz, Aires Jose Rover
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 252-275
2525-9822
2525-9822
reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
collection Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1808857238165520384

Registros relacionados