Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Claudia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Polewka, Gabriele
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/257
Resumo: Within the classical view of separation of powers, the judiciary originally occupied the weaker position. What is observed today, however, is a displacement of power from representative institutions to the judiciary, erecting a new kind of political regime that the Canadian political scientist Ran Hirschl called juristocracy. This paper intends to discuss this movement basing on the idea of hegemonic preservation, presented by Hirschl in his work Towards Juristocracy whose central hypothesis is that the political, economic and social elites voluntarily transfer power to the judiciary, when threatened of losing their hegemony in the political sphere. In Brazil, the 1988 Constitution turned the Supreme Court into one of the world's most powerful courts, which works at the same time as constitutional court, court of appeals and criminal court, responsible for deciding the most fundamental issues for brazilian society. We present at first, the examples used by Hirschl to illustrate his thesis about the judicial empowerment through constitutionalization, analyzing the political and economic changes in recent history of Israel, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa, followed by an analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil. We conclude that it is not possible to determine, in principle, the occurrence of hegemonic preservation in Brazil, but that Hirschl's analysis that offers an answer that challenges the traditional view on the judicialization of politics, contributes to the discussion and analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil.
id CONPEDI-12_79d565588b13dc346748be54f2c20f25
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/257
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-12
network_name_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository_id_str
spelling Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial EmpowermentJuristocracia no Brasil a Perspectiva de Ran Hirschl Sobre o Empoderamento JudicialDemocracy; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; JuristocracyDemocracia; Constitucionalismo; Judicial review; JuristocraciaWithin the classical view of separation of powers, the judiciary originally occupied the weaker position. What is observed today, however, is a displacement of power from representative institutions to the judiciary, erecting a new kind of political regime that the Canadian political scientist Ran Hirschl called juristocracy. This paper intends to discuss this movement basing on the idea of hegemonic preservation, presented by Hirschl in his work Towards Juristocracy whose central hypothesis is that the political, economic and social elites voluntarily transfer power to the judiciary, when threatened of losing their hegemony in the political sphere. In Brazil, the 1988 Constitution turned the Supreme Court into one of the world's most powerful courts, which works at the same time as constitutional court, court of appeals and criminal court, responsible for deciding the most fundamental issues for brazilian society. We present at first, the examples used by Hirschl to illustrate his thesis about the judicial empowerment through constitutionalization, analyzing the political and economic changes in recent history of Israel, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa, followed by an analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil. We conclude that it is not possible to determine, in principle, the occurrence of hegemonic preservation in Brazil, but that Hirschl's analysis that offers an answer that challenges the traditional view on the judicialization of politics, contributes to the discussion and analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil.Dentro da visão clássica de separação de poderes, o Judiciário, originalmente, ocupava a posição mais fraca. O que se observa hoje, contudo, é um deslocamento de poder das instituições representativas para as judiciais, erigindo um novo tipo de regime político chamado de juristocracia pelo cientista político canadense Ran Hirschl. Este paper se propõe a discutir esse deslocamento de forças com base na ideia de preservação hegemônica, apresentada por Hirschl na sua obra Towards Juristocracy, cuja hipótese central é que as elites políticas, econômicas e sociais transferem poder ao Judiciário, de forma voluntária, quando ameaçadas de perder a hegemonia na esfera política. No Brasil, a Constituição de 1988 transformou o Supremo Tribunal Federal numa das Cortes mais poderosas do mundo em  termos  institucionais,  que  funciona,  ao  mesmo  tempo,  como  Corte  constitucional, revisional e penal e a quem cabe decidir as questões mais fundamentais para a sociedade. Apresentaremos, primeiramente, os exemplos utilizados por Hirschl para ilustrar a sua tese acerca  do  empoderamento  judicial  através  da  constitucionalização,  analisando  as transformações políticas e econômicas ocorridas na história recente de Israel, Canadá, Nova Zelândia e África do Sul, fazendo, na sequência, uma análise do fenômeno no Brasil. Encerramos concluindo que não e possível determinar, em princípio, a ocorrência da hipótese de preservação hegemônica no Brasil, mas que a análise de Hirschl, ao oferecer uma resposta que desafia a visão tradicional sobre a judicialização da política, contribui para a discussão e análise do fenômeno no Brasil.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIBarbosa, Claudia MariaPolewka, Gabriele2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/25710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.257Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 309-3342525-98222525-9822reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/257/258Direitos autorais 2016 Claudia Maria Barbosa, Gabriele Polewkahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-01T19:30:55Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/257Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciariaONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98222525-9822opendoar:2017-03-01T19:30:55Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
Juristocracia no Brasil a Perspectiva de Ran Hirschl Sobre o Empoderamento Judicial
title Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
spellingShingle Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
Barbosa, Claudia Maria
Democracy; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Juristocracy
Democracia; Constitucionalismo; Judicial review; Juristocracia
title_short Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
title_full Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
title_fullStr Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
title_full_unstemmed Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
title_sort Juristocracy in Brazil Ran Hirschl's Perspective About Judicial Empowerment
author Barbosa, Claudia Maria
author_facet Barbosa, Claudia Maria
Polewka, Gabriele
author_role author
author2 Polewka, Gabriele
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa, Claudia Maria
Polewka, Gabriele
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Juristocracy
Democracia; Constitucionalismo; Judicial review; Juristocracia
topic Democracy; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Juristocracy
Democracia; Constitucionalismo; Judicial review; Juristocracia
description Within the classical view of separation of powers, the judiciary originally occupied the weaker position. What is observed today, however, is a displacement of power from representative institutions to the judiciary, erecting a new kind of political regime that the Canadian political scientist Ran Hirschl called juristocracy. This paper intends to discuss this movement basing on the idea of hegemonic preservation, presented by Hirschl in his work Towards Juristocracy whose central hypothesis is that the political, economic and social elites voluntarily transfer power to the judiciary, when threatened of losing their hegemony in the political sphere. In Brazil, the 1988 Constitution turned the Supreme Court into one of the world's most powerful courts, which works at the same time as constitutional court, court of appeals and criminal court, responsible for deciding the most fundamental issues for brazilian society. We present at first, the examples used by Hirschl to illustrate his thesis about the judicial empowerment through constitutionalization, analyzing the political and economic changes in recent history of Israel, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa, followed by an analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil. We conclude that it is not possible to determine, in principle, the occurrence of hegemonic preservation in Brazil, but that Hirschl's analysis that offers an answer that challenges the traditional view on the judicialization of politics, contributes to the discussion and analysis of the phenomenon in Brazil.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/257
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.257
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/257
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2015.v1i1.257
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/257/258
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Claudia Maria Barbosa, Gabriele Polewka
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Claudia Maria Barbosa, Gabriele Polewka
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO/DEZEMBRO; 309-334
2525-9822
2525-9822
reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
collection Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1798316650482630656