Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/365 |
Resumo: | The 1988 Federal Constitution provided in its article 6 as health is a fundamental social right, and provided in its article 196 that health is everyone's right and duty of the state, guaranteed through social and economic policies aimed at reducing disease risk and other hazards and at the universal and equal access to actions and services for its promotion, protection and recovery. And for the viability of this goal we created the Unified Health System (art. 198CF) to be implemented jointly by the Union, states and municipalities. In doing so the state took upon himself the duty prestacional the duty of health services at the same time it is defined right to health for all, to be fulfilled by appropriate public policies. It happens that in objective reality many people to seek the provision of public health services find themselves frustrated, not being properly met, and experiencing a condition of extreme vulnerability, especially people who do not have the financial resources to resort to private health services. That's when many of these people turn to the courts requesting that their right to health, enshrined in the Federal Constitution, is guaranteed and held, and the decisions of the courts to ensure these rights has been nominated for legalization of public policies, and generating a relationship tension between the political and legal sphere. That's what this paper analyzes focusing on the importance of the performance of the courts ensure constitutional and fundamental social rights of health care and make them effective, and thus, mitigating the part by conditions of vulnerability of those who flock to the courts hoping to see supported. |
id |
CONPEDI-23_a5a227cc22023dd3d48190c4849a918e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/365 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health CareJudicialização das Políticas Públicas de Saúde: a Relação Tensional Entre o Político e o Jurídico no Acesso à Justiça e Efetivação de Direitos Fundamentais Sociais de Assistência à SaúdeLegalization;Public health policies;Social vulnerability;Access to justice;Fundamental social rightsJudicialização;Políticas públicas de saúde;Vulnerabilidade social;Acesso à justiça;Direitos fundamentais sociaisThe 1988 Federal Constitution provided in its article 6 as health is a fundamental social right, and provided in its article 196 that health is everyone's right and duty of the state, guaranteed through social and economic policies aimed at reducing disease risk and other hazards and at the universal and equal access to actions and services for its promotion, protection and recovery. And for the viability of this goal we created the Unified Health System (art. 198CF) to be implemented jointly by the Union, states and municipalities. In doing so the state took upon himself the duty prestacional the duty of health services at the same time it is defined right to health for all, to be fulfilled by appropriate public policies. It happens that in objective reality many people to seek the provision of public health services find themselves frustrated, not being properly met, and experiencing a condition of extreme vulnerability, especially people who do not have the financial resources to resort to private health services. That's when many of these people turn to the courts requesting that their right to health, enshrined in the Federal Constitution, is guaranteed and held, and the decisions of the courts to ensure these rights has been nominated for legalization of public policies, and generating a relationship tension between the political and legal sphere. That's what this paper analyzes focusing on the importance of the performance of the courts ensure constitutional and fundamental social rights of health care and make them effective, and thus, mitigating the part by conditions of vulnerability of those who flock to the courts hoping to see supported.A Constituição Federal de 1988 dispôs em seu artigo 6º ser a saúde um direito fundamental social, e dispôs em seu artigo 196 que a saúde é direito de todos e dever do Estado, garantido mediante políticas sociais e econômicas que visem à redução do risco de doença e de outros agravos e ao acesso universal e igualitário às ações e serviços para sua promoção, proteção e recuperação. E para a viabilização deste objetivo criou o Sistema Único de Saúde (art. 198 C. F.) a ser implementado conjuntamente pela União, Estados e Municípios. Ao fazê-lo o Estado assumiu para si o dever prestacional dos serviços de saúde, ao mesmo tempo em que definiu ser a saúde direito de todos, a ser efetivado mediante políticas públicas adequadas. Ocorre que na realidade fática muitas pessoas ao buscar a prestação de serviços públicos de saúde se vêem frustradas, não sendo devidamente atendidas, e experimentando uma condição de extrema vulnerabilidade, principalmente pessoas que não dispõem de recursos financeiros para recorrer a serviços privados de saúde. É quando muitas destas pessoas recorrem ao Poder Judiciário requerendo que seu direito à saúde, consignado na Constituição Federal, seja garantido e realizado, sendo que as decisões dos tribunais no sentido de garantir estes direitos tem sido nominados de judicialização das políticas públicas, e gerando uma relação tensional entre a esfera política e jurídica. É o que o presente artigo busca analisar enfocando a importância da atuação dos tribunais visando assegurar direitos fundamentais sociais constitucionais de assistência à saúde e torná-los efetivos, e desta forma, mitigando as condições de vulnerabilidade por parte dos que acorrem aos tribunais na esperança de se verem amparados.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISilva, Juvêncio BorgesSilveira, Ricardo dos Reis2016-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/36510.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.365Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO2526-026X2526-026Xreponame:Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/365/368Direitos autorais 2016 Juvêncio Borges Silva Borges Silva, Ricardo dos Reis Silveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-11T14:54:44Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/365Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/oai2526-026X2526-026Xopendoar:2020-09-11T14:54:44Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care Judicialização das Políticas Públicas de Saúde: a Relação Tensional Entre o Político e o Jurídico no Acesso à Justiça e Efetivação de Direitos Fundamentais Sociais de Assistência à Saúde |
title |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
spellingShingle |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care Silva, Juvêncio Borges Legalization;Public health policies;Social vulnerability;Access to justice;Fundamental social rights Judicialização;Políticas públicas de saúde;Vulnerabilidade social;Acesso à justiça;Direitos fundamentais sociais |
title_short |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
title_full |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
title_fullStr |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
title_sort |
Judicialization of Public Health Policies: the Tension Relationship Between the Political and Legal Access to Justice and Effective of Fundamental Rights of Social Health Care |
author |
Silva, Juvêncio Borges |
author_facet |
Silva, Juvêncio Borges Silveira, Ricardo dos Reis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira, Ricardo dos Reis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Juvêncio Borges Silveira, Ricardo dos Reis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legalization;Public health policies;Social vulnerability;Access to justice;Fundamental social rights Judicialização;Políticas públicas de saúde;Vulnerabilidade social;Acesso à justiça;Direitos fundamentais sociais |
topic |
Legalization;Public health policies;Social vulnerability;Access to justice;Fundamental social rights Judicialização;Políticas públicas de saúde;Vulnerabilidade social;Acesso à justiça;Direitos fundamentais sociais |
description |
The 1988 Federal Constitution provided in its article 6 as health is a fundamental social right, and provided in its article 196 that health is everyone's right and duty of the state, guaranteed through social and economic policies aimed at reducing disease risk and other hazards and at the universal and equal access to actions and services for its promotion, protection and recovery. And for the viability of this goal we created the Unified Health System (art. 198CF) to be implemented jointly by the Union, states and municipalities. In doing so the state took upon himself the duty prestacional the duty of health services at the same time it is defined right to health for all, to be fulfilled by appropriate public policies. It happens that in objective reality many people to seek the provision of public health services find themselves frustrated, not being properly met, and experiencing a condition of extreme vulnerability, especially people who do not have the financial resources to resort to private health services. That's when many of these people turn to the courts requesting that their right to health, enshrined in the Federal Constitution, is guaranteed and held, and the decisions of the courts to ensure these rights has been nominated for legalization of public policies, and generating a relationship tension between the political and legal sphere. That's what this paper analyzes focusing on the importance of the performance of the courts ensure constitutional and fundamental social rights of health care and make them effective, and thus, mitigating the part by conditions of vulnerability of those who flock to the courts hoping to see supported. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/365 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.365 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/365 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i1.365 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/acessoajustica/article/view/365/368 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Juvêncio Borges Silva Borges Silva, Ricardo dos Reis Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Juvêncio Borges Silva Borges Silva, Ricardo dos Reis Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO 2526-026X 2526-026X reponame:Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça |
collection |
Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808858161807884288 |