FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/374 |
Resumo: | The study’s objective is to analyze how the ethno-cultural dissent can be administered in the perspective of dialogue and the recognition of the rights and culture of the "other". For this, we will analyze the case of Saramaka versus Suriname and the decision of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights on this conflict. In this scenario, the proposal is to reflect if the consultation and the principle of free, prior and informed consent can be instruments to ensure cultural diversity and the rights of affected people. The methodology consists in the literature that dialogues with the Law and the Anthropology. |
id |
CONPEDI-24_cf040e1899e7bdef0f75a0814c0bcbed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/374 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAMEPELO DIREITO DE SER OUVIDO: REFLEXÕES A PARTIR DO CASO SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAMEIndigenous and tribal rights, Multiculturalism, HearingDireitos indígenas e tribais, Multiculturalismo, OitivaThe study’s objective is to analyze how the ethno-cultural dissent can be administered in the perspective of dialogue and the recognition of the rights and culture of the "other". For this, we will analyze the case of Saramaka versus Suriname and the decision of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights on this conflict. In this scenario, the proposal is to reflect if the consultation and the principle of free, prior and informed consent can be instruments to ensure cultural diversity and the rights of affected people. The methodology consists in the literature that dialogues with the Law and the Anthropology.O objetivo do trabalho é analisar como o dissenso étnico-cultural pode ser administrado sob a perspectiva do diálogo e com o reconhecimento do direito e da cultura do “outro”. Para tanto, analisaremos o caso Saramaka versus Suriname e levantaremos reflexões a partir da decisão daCorteInteramericanadeDireitosHumanossobreesteconflito.Nessecenário,tem-se como proposta refletir se a consulta e o princípio do consentimento livre, prévio e informado podemserinstrumentosparagarantiradiversidadeculturaleosdireitosdospovosafetados. A metodologia consiste em um levantamento bibliográfico que dialoga com o Direito e a Antropologia.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIHöelz, Yanahê FendelerSilveira, Alysson Amorim Mendes2016-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/37410.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i1.374Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/junho2526-02512526-0251reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídicainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/374/376Direitos autorais 2016 Yanahê Fendeler Höelz, Alysson Amorim Mendes Silveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T01:29:40Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/374Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/ONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2526-02512526-0251opendoar:2021-08-20T01:29:40Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME PELO DIREITO DE SER OUVIDO: REFLEXÕES A PARTIR DO CASO SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
title |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
spellingShingle |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME Höelz, Yanahê Fendeler Indigenous and tribal rights, Multiculturalism, Hearing Direitos indígenas e tribais, Multiculturalismo, Oitiva |
title_short |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
title_full |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
title_fullStr |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
title_full_unstemmed |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
title_sort |
FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: REFLECTIONS FROM THE CASE SARAMAKA VERSUS SURINAME |
author |
Höelz, Yanahê Fendeler |
author_facet |
Höelz, Yanahê Fendeler Silveira, Alysson Amorim Mendes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira, Alysson Amorim Mendes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Höelz, Yanahê Fendeler Silveira, Alysson Amorim Mendes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Indigenous and tribal rights, Multiculturalism, Hearing Direitos indígenas e tribais, Multiculturalismo, Oitiva |
topic |
Indigenous and tribal rights, Multiculturalism, Hearing Direitos indígenas e tribais, Multiculturalismo, Oitiva |
description |
The study’s objective is to analyze how the ethno-cultural dissent can be administered in the perspective of dialogue and the recognition of the rights and culture of the "other". For this, we will analyze the case of Saramaka versus Suriname and the decision of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights on this conflict. In this scenario, the proposal is to reflect if the consultation and the principle of free, prior and informed consent can be instruments to ensure cultural diversity and the rights of affected people. The methodology consists in the literature that dialogues with the Law and the Anthropology. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/374 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i1.374 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/374 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i1.374 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/374/376 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Yanahê Fendeler Höelz, Alysson Amorim Mendes Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Yanahê Fendeler Höelz, Alysson Amorim Mendes Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): janeiro/junho 2526-0251 2526-0251 reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
collection |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br |
_version_ |
1798314867998851072 |