BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/187
Resumo: The article aims to speculate about a normative unitary sense adequate to dealing with the pluralism and the complexity of contemporary societies. This is done through a reflection on the contemporary constitutionalism role before the International Human Rights Law. The starting point is a critical analyses on the limits and possibilities of a theory that has constantly fostered and grounded the adjudication function exercise, that is, the value balancing proposed, mainly, through Robert Alexy thesis. Through a discursive (Habermas) and constructive (Dworkin) law perspective, the critical proposal showed in the article aims to advocate the force of the international human rights normative system, even against severe conditions on the ground. This normative force is the key to the reconstruction of the adjudication function legitimacy and a first step to talk about a transnational constitutionalism.
id CONPEDI-25_c6175a0911c3f1933e397ffcb069c7d6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/187
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-25
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional
repository_id_str
spelling BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITYO CONSTITUCIONALISMO BRASILEIRO PERANTE AS EXIGÊNCIAS DO DIREITO INTERNACIONAL DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: DIÁLOGOS A RESPEITO DO SENTIDO ADEQUADO DE UMA UNIDADE NA PLURALIDADE NORMATIVAconstitutionalism, Human rights, Discursive theory, Pluralism, Judiciary powerconstitucionalismo, Direitos humanos, Teoria discursiva, Pluralismo, Poder judiciárioThe article aims to speculate about a normative unitary sense adequate to dealing with the pluralism and the complexity of contemporary societies. This is done through a reflection on the contemporary constitutionalism role before the International Human Rights Law. The starting point is a critical analyses on the limits and possibilities of a theory that has constantly fostered and grounded the adjudication function exercise, that is, the value balancing proposed, mainly, through Robert Alexy thesis. Through a discursive (Habermas) and constructive (Dworkin) law perspective, the critical proposal showed in the article aims to advocate the force of the international human rights normative system, even against severe conditions on the ground. This normative force is the key to the reconstruction of the adjudication function legitimacy and a first step to talk about a transnational constitutionalism.O trabalho procura refletir a respeito de um sentido normativo unitário adequado a lidar com o pluralismo e a complexidade das sociedades atuais. Isto é feito a partir de uma reflexão sobre o papel do constitucionalismo contemporâneo ante o Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos. O ponto de partida é uma análise crítica sobre os limites e possibilidades de uma teoria que recorrentemente tem embalado e fundamentado o exercício da função jurisdicional, qual seja, a ponderação de valores proposta, principalmente, a partir de Robert Alexy. Diante de uma perspectiva discursiva (Habermas) e construtivista (Dworkin) do direito, a proposta crítica apresentada no artigo procura reivindicar a força da normativa internacional de direitos humanos, mesmo diante de um árduo campo de trabalho. Esta força normativa é a chave para uma reconstrução da legitimidade da função jurisdicional e um passo inicial para se pensar um constitucionalismo transnacional.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIMeyer, Emilio Peluso Neder2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/18710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-961X/2015.v1i1.187Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO2525-961X2525-961Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucionalinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/187/189Direitos autorais 2016 Emilio Peluso Neder Meyerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-18T03:15:58Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/187Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/ONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2525-961X2525-961Xopendoar:2018-02-18T03:15:58Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
O CONSTITUCIONALISMO BRASILEIRO PERANTE AS EXIGÊNCIAS DO DIREITO INTERNACIONAL DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS: DIÁLOGOS A RESPEITO DO SENTIDO ADEQUADO DE UMA UNIDADE NA PLURALIDADE NORMATIVA
title BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
spellingShingle BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder
constitutionalism, Human rights, Discursive theory, Pluralism, Judiciary power
constitucionalismo, Direitos humanos, Teoria discursiva, Pluralismo, Poder judiciário
title_short BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
title_full BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
title_fullStr BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
title_full_unstemmed BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
title_sort BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DEMANDS: DISCUSSIONS ON THE ADEQUATE MEANING OF A UNITY ON THE NORMATIVE PLURALITY
author Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder
author_facet Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meyer, Emilio Peluso Neder
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv constitutionalism, Human rights, Discursive theory, Pluralism, Judiciary power
constitucionalismo, Direitos humanos, Teoria discursiva, Pluralismo, Poder judiciário
topic constitutionalism, Human rights, Discursive theory, Pluralism, Judiciary power
constitucionalismo, Direitos humanos, Teoria discursiva, Pluralismo, Poder judiciário
description The article aims to speculate about a normative unitary sense adequate to dealing with the pluralism and the complexity of contemporary societies. This is done through a reflection on the contemporary constitutionalism role before the International Human Rights Law. The starting point is a critical analyses on the limits and possibilities of a theory that has constantly fostered and grounded the adjudication function exercise, that is, the value balancing proposed, mainly, through Robert Alexy thesis. Through a discursive (Habermas) and constructive (Dworkin) law perspective, the critical proposal showed in the article aims to advocate the force of the international human rights normative system, even against severe conditions on the ground. This normative force is the key to the reconstruction of the adjudication function legitimacy and a first step to talk about a transnational constitutionalism.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/187
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-961X/2015.v1i1.187
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/187
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-961X/2015.v1i1.187
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriaconstitucional/article/view/187/189
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Emilio Peluso Neder Meyer
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Emilio Peluso Neder Meyer
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO
2525-961X
2525-961X
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional
collection Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br
_version_ 1798314930826379264

Registros relacionados